Had Kamala Harris been elected, this is probably where the US would be today, just like Canada is today

[Votto]

Frightening, isn't it?

 

[Mashmont]

China is very happy about this kind of stuff going on in North America. Of course you will NEVER see such a display in China. Such people would be imprisoned or worse. This is for Western consumption in order to weaken us.

 

[Votto]

China is very happy about this kind of stuff going on in North America. Of course you will NEVER see such a display in China. Such people would be imprisoned or worse. This is for Western consumption in order to weaken us.

China is too busy trying to take over the world while Canada is too busy arguing over gender cards.

BTW, what the hell is even a gender card and what were these buffoons arguing about?

 

[Invisibleflash]

Frightening, isn't it?

 

[IM2]

Wong. You didn't read her plan.

Wayback Machine

And Canada is in better shape than we are.

 

[Invisibleflash]

China is too busy trying to take over the world while Canada is too busy arguing over gender cards.

BTW, what the hell is even a gender card and what were these buffoons arguing about?

OK, agree about Canada, but China only has 1 or 2 military bases in other countries. So, they will have a tough time catching up to America's +/- 800 foreign military bases to try and take over the world. The reality is the USA is trying to break up Russia into small countries, completely destroy Iran and encircle China to shut off its crude oil supply.

 

[Votto]

View attachment 1239805

OK, agree about Canada, but China only has 1 or 2 military bases in other countries. So, they will have a tough time catching up to America's +/- 800 foreign military bases to try and take over the world. The reality is the USA is trying to break up Russia into small countries, completely destroy Iran and encircle China to shut off its crude oil supply.

View attachment 1239806

View attachment 1239807

China and Russia and Venezuela and Iran and Cuba all formed alliances to fight the US. In fact, Iran is one of the very few countries in the world that supported the invasion of the Ukraine.

Trump simply pulled the Monroe Doctrine card out and said none of this can go on in the North American hemisphere, much like JFK said that Cuba could not hold nukes that almost brought the US to the brink of nuclear war.

Iran has been at war with the US since their revolution in 1979, and I can list the number of attacks over the years on Americans to back that up. The US had no interest in being at war with them, however. Iran has been poking the bear that entire time wanting a shown down that they have right now. The US could care less about their oil because they get their oil other places. The sole reason Trump is even there is to prevent them from getting nukes and producing weapons that can deliver them into the US so that, for the first time in history, they could actually attack the US directly, something they have done only through various proxies throughout the Middle East till now.

As for your antisemitic BS, you can just shove it.

 

[Votto]

Wong. You didn't read her plan.

Wayback Machine

And Canada is in better shape than we are.

Then move there moron.

 

[IM2]

Then move there moron.

No. Just face the truth MAGAT.

 

[August West]

Then move there moron.

The answer of a 6 year old.

 

[August West]

China and Russia and Venezuela and Iran and Cuba all formed alliances to fight the US. In fact, Iran is one of the very few countries in the world that supported the invasion of the Ukraine.

Trump simply pulled the Monroe Doctrine card out and said none of this can go on in the North American hemisphere, much like JFK said that Cuba could not hold nukes that almost brought the US to the brink of nuclear war.

Iran has been at war with the US since their revolution in 1979, and I can list the number of attacks over the years on Americans to back that up. The US had no interest in being at war with them, however. Iran has been poking the bear that entire time wanting a shown down that they have right now. The US could care less about their oil because they get their oil other places. The sole reason Trump is even there is to prevent them from getting nukes and producing weapons that can deliver them into the US so that, for the first time in history, they could actually attack the US directly, something they have done only through various proxies throughout the Middle East till now.

As for your antisemitic BS, you can just shove it.

Of course, they have We`ve all seen Iran`s aircraft carriers and submarines lurking off the coast of New Jersey.

 

[IM2]

China and Russia and Venezuela and Iran and Cuba all formed alliances to fight the US. In fact, Iran is one of the very few countries in the world that supported the invasion of the Ukraine.

Trump simply pulled the Monroe Doctrine card out and said none of this can go on in the North American hemisphere, much like JFK said that Cuba could not hold nukes that almost brought the US to the brink of nuclear war.

Iran has been at war with the US since their revolution in 1979, and I can list the number of attacks over the years on Americans to back that up. The US had no interest in being at war with them, however. Iran has been poking the bear that entire time wanting a shown down that they have right now. The US could care less about their oil because they get their oil other places. The sole reason Trump is even there is to prevent them from getting nukes and producing weapons that can deliver them into the US so that, for the first time in history, they could actually attack the US directly, something they have done only through various proxies throughout the Middle East till now.

As for your antisemitic BS, you can just shove it.

Liar.

The war started in 1953. We started it, along with Britain.

Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

Legacy: Roots of Resentment​

The coup’s consequences were profound.

Domestic Authoritarianism: The Shah, restored to power, ruled with increasing autocracy for the next 25 years. His reliance on Western backing and his creation of SAVAK deepened repression.

National Humiliation: The coup became a collective memory of betrayal. When revolution erupted in 1979, chants of “Death to America” and “Death to England” drew directly on the memory of 1953.

Cold War Geopolitics: For Washington, Iran became a key ally, hosting U.S. military bases and serving as a pillar of containment. Yet the very alliance sowed the seeds of future estrangement.

Oil Nationalism: Although Mosaddegh was defeated, the principle of oil sovereignty remained powerful. Later OPEC revolts against Western oil companies drew inspiration from Iran’s example.

Enduring Distrust: The coup poisoned U.S.–Iran relations. Even today, Iranian leaders cite 1953 as proof of American duplicity. For many Iranians, the coup explains why foreign influence must be resisted at all costs.

Conclusion​

The coup of 1953 was a turning point in modern Iran. It crushed a democratic experiment, restored an autocratic Shah, and reasserted Western control over oil. For the United States and Britain, it was a Cold War victory; for Iranians, it was a national trauma. Its legacy shaped the revolutionary anger of 1979 and continues to color relations between Iran and the West.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

 

[22lcidw]

Of course, they have We`ve all seen Iran`s aircraft carriers and submarines lurking off the coast of New Jersey.

You hate the founding fathers. And yet a major plank was telling the future generations about not getting into foreign entanglements. The NAVY and Marines were charted to keep the sea lanes open for trade. After that, everything else is not what was envisioned.

 

[Votto]

Liar.

The war started in 1953. We started it, along with Britain.

View attachment 1239846


Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

Legacy: Roots of Resentment​

The coup’s consequences were profound.

Domestic Authoritarianism: The Shah, restored to power, ruled with increasing autocracy for the next 25 years. His reliance on Western backing and his creation of SAVAK deepened repression.

National Humiliation: The coup became a collective memory of betrayal. When revolution erupted in 1979, chants of “Death to America” and “Death to England” drew directly on the memory of 1953.

Cold War Geopolitics: For Washington, Iran became a key ally, hosting U.S. military bases and serving as a pillar of containment. Yet the very alliance sowed the seeds of future estrangement.

Oil Nationalism: Although Mosaddegh was defeated, the principle of oil sovereignty remained powerful. Later OPEC revolts against Western oil companies drew inspiration from Iran’s example.

Enduring Distrust: The coup poisoned U.S.–Iran relations. Even today, Iranian leaders cite 1953 as proof of American duplicity. For many Iranians, the coup explains why foreign influence must be resisted at all costs.

Conclusion​

The coup of 1953 was a turning point in modern Iran. It crushed a democratic experiment, restored an autocratic Shah, and reasserted Western control over oil. For the United States and Britain, it was a Cold War victory; for Iranians, it was a national trauma. Its legacy shaped the revolutionary anger of 1979 and continues to color relations between Iran and the West.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

Oh, God help us, the Left is virtue signaling about wanting to preserve democracy again. Do you really think that the Iranian regime cares about democracy? I think they answered that question by gunning down around 30 thousand of their own citizens recently for protesting about their own government. The question for you is, do you care? Hell no, you don't care. You only care about demonizing Trump as well as demonizing the past America that was not Left wing enough for you. You care about as much for Iranian democracy as you do in your own party, when you removed a democratically elected nominee for President in the dead of night and appointed someone else instead. Like it or not, the people of Iran were much better off under the Shah, as bad as that may have been.

Am I going to sit here and defend the evils of the past that may have been committed by the US government? Hell no, that is on them, but to suggest that the US and the world deserves any evil inflicted on them for payment for those sins is a bit like telling me that I need to pay endless reparations for sins of the past in my own country, sins I had nothing to do with as you pay people who were never slaves. Meanwhile, Left wing dolts like yourself ignore the 600 pound gorilla in the room, which is that there are more slaves today than at any other time in world history. What is the Left doing about that? Nothing, they would rather virtue signal about caring about slavery that happened hundreds of years ago, regarding people who are all long dead. The same thing is being done here by you by crying crockadile tears about what may have occurred in the 1950's. Well guess what, none of us had anything to do with that, and neither did Trump. Now Trump is asked to deal with the reality here and now instead, which is a rogue country that is hell bent on the destruction of the US and Israel at any cost, all to appease the warped since of social justice that the current Islamo fascists have about dealing with the evils done to them in the past.

What you need to do is grow the hell up and understand that governments around the world suck arse in terms of the evils they have all done in the past. The difference between you and I, however, is that I view government as a necessary evil, and therefore should be limited as much as possible due to such evils as you just brought up. But you think government is you salvation instead, that is, only government run by the Left because somehow, they are soooo much more righteous and virtuous and other people that exist for some reason so you wish to empower them as much as you possibly can. Hilarious!

For you, the thing to do is not get fixated on the specific sins of those specific countries, the thing to do is look around to get a broad understanding of which regimes are far worse than others that need dealt with. According to you and the Left, the Trump regime is far worse than the Iranian regime, for which I disagree vehemently. After all, when was the last time Trump gunned down protestors against him? In fact, we still have the freedom of speech which is denied Iranian citizens 24/7. Women and gays are also far better off under Trump than the Iranian regime, and the US government does not have 80% of its citizens living in poverty either when the Iranian people should be enjoying one of the highest standards of living in the world due to the oil wealth of their country. Instead, the Iranian regime either hordes the oil wealth for themselves, or they use it to fund terrorism around the Middle East, as well as weapons development so that they can one day strike the US.

Here is the regime IQ2 thinks is so much better than the US regime

 

[1srelluc]

We are just lucky that the vile dems were not smart enough to simply replace Biden with Harris as POTUS.....She could have done a lot more damage to the country before she left office.

 

[IM2]

Oh, God help us, the Left is virtue signaling about wanting to preserve democracy again. Do you really think that the Iranian regime cares about democracy? I think they answered that question by gunning down around 30 thousand of their own citizens recently for protesting about their own government. The question for you is, do you care? Hell no, you don't care. You only care about demonizing Trump as well as demonizing the past America that was not Left wing enough for you. You care about as much for Iranian democracy as you do in your own party, when you removed a democratically elected nominee for President in the dead of night and appointed someone else instead. Like it or not, the people of Iran were much better off under the Shah, as bad as that may have been.

Am I going to sit here and defend the evils of the past that may have been committed by the US government? Hell no, that is on them, but to suggest that the US and the world deserves any evil inflicted on them for payment for those sins is a bit like telling me that I need to pay endless reparations for sins of the past in my own country, sins I had nothing to do with as you pay people who were never slaves. Meanwhile, Left wing dolts like yourself ignore the 600 pound gorilla in the room, which is that there are more slaves today than at any other time in world history. What is the Left doing about that? Nothing, they would rather virtue signal about caring about slavery that happened hundreds of years ago, regarding people who are all long dead. The same thing is being done here by you by crying crockadile tears about what may have occurred in the 1950's. Well guess what, none of us had anything to do with that, and neither did Trump. Now Trump is asked to deal with the reality here and now instead, which is a rogue country that is hell bent on the destruction of the US and Israel at any cost, all to appease the warped since of social justice that the current Islamo fascists have about dealing with the evils done to them in the past.

What you need to do is grow the hell up and understand that governments around the world suck arse in terms of the evils they have all done in the past. The difference between you and I, however, is that I view government as a necessary evil, and therefore should be limited as much as possible due to such evils as you just brought up. But you think government is you salvation instead, that is, only government run by the Left because somehow, they are soooo much more righteous and virtuous and other people that exist for some reason so you wish to empower them as much as you possibly can. Hilarious!

For you, the thing to do is not get fixated on the specific sins of those specific countries, the thing to do is look around to get a broad understanding of which regimes are far worse than others that need dealt with. According to you and the Left, the Trump regime is far worse than the Iranian regime, for which I disagree vehemently. After all, when was the last time Trump gunned down protestors against him? In fact, we still have the freedom of speech which is denied Iranian citizens 24/7. Women and gays are also far better off under Trump than the Iranian regime, and the US government does not have 80% of its citizens living in poverty either when the Iranian people should be enjoying one of the highest standards of living in the world due to the oil wealth of their country. Instead, the Iranian regime either hordes the oil wealth for themselves, or they use it to fund terrorism around the Middle East, as well as weapons development so that they can one day strike the US.

Here is the regime IQ2 thinks is so much better than the US regime

You need to stop believing you know what I think. You are the type that wants to refer to the founders, but when it comes to things that do not glorify whites, then the past was too long ago. If we had left Iran alone in 1953, we would not be in this situation today.

The Trump regime is the one that needs to be dealt with. It is the regime with the most powerful army and weapons, and it is the regime that is committing state terror right now. You are talking about Iran and the possibility of nukes, meaning they do not have nukes now, while we have an unstable fool who is in charge of the world's largest nuclear arsenal. You post videos about Iran, but women here don't have rights. Iran is not a direct threat to me. Trump is.

 

[Crepitus]

Frightening, isn't it?

That has nothing to do with Harris.

You are coming across as desperate.