Grok "AI" predicts Vance will WIN in 2028...

[Freedomisneverfree]

Grok "AI" predicts Vance will win in 2028. They assume he is up against Kamala Harris. He leads her by 100 in the end.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Pray for America

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Grok "AI" predicts Vance will win in 2028. They assume he is up against Kamala Harris. He leads her by 100 in the end.

Grok cannot possibly get it wrong because if Vance loses, you guys are gonna pretend it was fraud.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Grok cannot possibly get it wrong because if Vance loses, you guys are gonna pretend it was fraud.

"you guys?"

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

"you guys?"

Yes, you are included among those who pretend there was fraud when your favorite candidate loses.

 

[Anomalism]

They would be stupid to run Kamala again.

AOC is not very bright.

Bernie is too old.

Elizabeth Warren maybe?

They're in trouble.

 

[Couchpotato]

They would be stupid to run Kamala again.

AOC is not very bright.

Bernie is too old.

Elizabeth Warren maybe?

They're in trouble.

I’d bet it’s not someone on the radar yet. The 2 most successful (D) Presidents we’ve had in the recent past weren’t “contenders” 3 years before they were elected. Clinton and Obama.

 

[Anomalism]

I’d bet it’s not someone on the radar yet. The 2 most successful (D) Presidents we’ve had in the recent past weren’t “contenders” 3 years before they were elected. Clinton and Obama.

You may be right.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Grok "AI" predicts Vance will win in 2028. They assume he is up against Kamala Harris. He leads her by 100 in the end.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Grok cannot possibly get it wrong because if Vance loses, you guys are gonna pretend it was fraud.

It's funny how your name says "Conservative" and has a Reagan avatar - but you sound like the most deranged Karen TDS-addled Feminazi borne from the bowels of MSNOW.

But we all know.

It's nuanced and complicated.

And we clearly don't have the intellectual capacity to understand that despite the fact that you sound like a complete commie dumbass - you're actually super right wing and stuff - thus proving how misguided and off track WE all are.

Amirite?

 

[braalian]

AI chatbots learn from previous “conversations” you’ve had with them and just tell you what you want to hear

 

[Couchpotato]

AI chatbots learn from previous “conversations” you’ve had with them and just tell you what you want to hear

While true Id guess Vance would win if it actually were Vance v Harris in 2028 which I highly doubt will happen. Vance has IMO killed any shot at being President given how the current admin has gone. That said Harris is a TERRIBLE candidate, and Vance would make her look really really stupid in the debates. Vance might be the candidate for the GOP and if he is he likely loses unless the Democrats run someone like Harris or AOC. And they might. They didn't learn the first time Trump was elected, largely because the Democrats ran a very unlikable HRC. If the DNC didn't **** over Bernie and put HRC in the candidate seats Trump is likely never President. If they had run a competent candidate in 2024 instead of trying to elect a "first" Trump likely doesn't get a second term. Its wild because there are plenty of exceedingly qualified women (both white and black) who would probably make good Presidents. They just never seem to get the nod....

 

[Anomalism]

AI chatbots learn from previous “conversations” you’ve had with them and just tell you what you want to hear

Not if you intentionally prompt them into honest calculations. They can be made to understand you want the truth, not just what they think will please you.

 

[Winco]

They would be stupid to run Kamala again.

AOC is not very bright.

Bernie is too old.

Elizabeth Warren maybe?

They're in trouble.

Newsom

 

[Robert W]

Newsom

Poor choice.

 

[Winco]

Poor choice.

Sleep it off

 

[Robert W]

Vance might be the candidate for the GOP and if he is he likely loses unless the Democrats run someone like Harris or AOC.

Democrats put up poor candidates. They really have no "good" people then can run. Vance is a shoe in from the looks of it. Winco put up the dyslexic, low passing score Gavin Newsom which amuses me.

 

[Robert W]

Sleep it off

Newsom sleeps it off.

 

[toobfreak]

"you guys?"

Proof once again this bum ain't no "conservative."

The idiot just admitted he'll be voting again for the word-salad marxist beeach.

 

[Couchpotato]

Democrats put up poor candidates. They really have no "good" people then can run. Vance is a shoe in from the looks of it. Winco put up the dyslexic, low passing score Gavin Newsom which amuses me.

Vance is far from a shoe in. Trump is ******* up his second term BIGLY