Dr Grump
Platinum Member
Gone through the first few. Contentious to say the least...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Way to refute them with facts, man.Gone through the first few. Contentious to say the least...
You are so full of shit the NYC water and sewage dept couldn't process it all, ya fuck.Deal with it Iceberg. I love your hypocrisy. Tell him to change the title to his thread and I will respond. Till then I will not respond. The thread is based on a lie. BTW why are you so afraid to demand he change the title to the thread?so you ain't got shit and can't refute the content of the article.LOL..I will not respond to a thread base based a lie. Tell the OP to change the title. Until then it is all a lie.it's so hilarious you can't address the topic but have to attack the poster.It is so hilarious that someone calls out the media for lying than lies themselves about what the media critic is criticizing the media for. Then to pour that irony into a steaming kettle of irony, Attkisson writes that Trump "commits the same violations" that she is accusing the media of doing.Mistakes and missteps. Hilarious.
Layers and layers of fact checkers.
And never any corrections nearing the headline lies.
do you have anything else or are you just going to keep being sideshow bob and hope no one else realizes you're whizzing on yourself instead?
In Trumplandia, a place that you are a resident, lies are de riguer, so it is obvious why it does not bother you. To the rest of us, I will not engage in a thread based on a false premise other than call the OP out on it.
Why are you not calling out the OP to change the title to the thread?
why do you keep dancing, sideshow? I ai t playing your dumbass game. address the article. if you like I'll start one in the media section with the title the site uses. would you talk to the content then or get mad at something else and refuse to acknowledge it?
Triggered boy....Your avatar is correct. A berg just floating aimlessly with nothing to say and a witless reply.You are so full of shit the NYC water and sewage dept couldn't process it all, ya fuck.Deal with it Iceberg. I love your hypocrisy. Tell him to change the title to his thread and I will respond. Till then I will not respond. The thread is based on a lie. BTW why are you so afraid to demand he change the title to the thread?so you ain't got shit and can't refute the content of the article.LOL..I will not respond to a thread base based a lie. Tell the OP to change the title. Until then it is all a lie.it's so hilarious you can't address the topic but have to attack the poster.It is so hilarious that someone calls out the media for lying than lies themselves about what the media critic is criticizing the media for. Then to pour that irony into a steaming kettle of irony, Attkisson writes that Trump "commits the same violations" that she is accusing the media of doing.
do you have anything else or are you just going to keep being sideshow bob and hope no one else realizes you're whizzing on yourself instead?
In Trumplandia, a place that you are a resident, lies are de riguer, so it is obvious why it does not bother you. To the rest of us, I will not engage in a thread based on a false premise other than call the OP out on it.
Why are you not calling out the OP to change the title to the thread?
why do you keep dancing, sideshow? I ai t playing your dumbass game. address the article. if you like I'll start one in the media section with the title the site uses. would you talk to the content then or get mad at something else and refuse to acknowledge it?
says the man who won't address a single point.Triggered boy....Your avatar is correct. A berg just floating aimlessly with nothing to say and a witless reply.You are so full of shit the NYC water and sewage dept couldn't process it all, ya fuck.Deal with it Iceberg. I love your hypocrisy. Tell him to change the title to his thread and I will respond. Till then I will not respond. The thread is based on a lie. BTW why are you so afraid to demand he change the title to the thread?so you ain't got shit and can't refute the content of the article.LOL..I will not respond to a thread base based a lie. Tell the OP to change the title. Until then it is all a lie.it's so hilarious you can't address the topic but have to attack the poster.
do you have anything else or are you just going to keep being sideshow bob and hope no one else realizes you're whizzing on yourself instead?
In Trumplandia, a place that you are a resident, lies are de riguer, so it is obvious why it does not bother you. To the rest of us, I will not engage in a thread based on a false premise other than call the OP out on it.
Why are you not calling out the OP to change the title to the thread?
why do you keep dancing, sideshow? I ai t playing your dumbass game. address the article. if you like I'll start one in the media section with the title the site uses. would you talk to the content then or get mad at something else and refuse to acknowledge it?
Way to refute them with facts, man.Gone through the first few. Contentious to say the least...
Liberals are so fun to bat around,
Their playbook is wide and shallow. Never discuss specifics. Attack the other side personally and accuse them of doing what you are doing,
So fucking pathetic.
Why lie about what Nancy Sinatra allegedly said? Why? Is that super fucking easy to check before reporting on?
115 examples of FAKE NEWS, and the libs here can not refute a single one. Pathetic.
the point is - and you are trying to gloss over it - the press makes a TON of mistakes in big bold headlines you eat up with a spoon. when proven wrong, is their OOPS of the same variety in WE MESSED UP?Way to refute them with facts, man.Gone through the first few. Contentious to say the least...
Example: CORRECTION: PAUL MANAFORT asked KONSTANTIN KILIMNIK to pass TRUMP polling to the Ukrainian oligarchs SERHIY LYOVOCHKIN & RINAT AKHMETOV, & not to OLEG DERIPASKA, as originally reported. We have corrected the story & I deleted a tweet repeating the error
For a start, a correction was offered. They didn't continue to perpetuate the lie, unlike someone else we know who constantly does so even with irrefutable evidence to the contrary (ie "my inaugural crowd was the biggest ever!!).
That aside, oh, he got the wrong oligarch! That makes Manafort asking for the info to be passed on to another oligarch okay then! (god, I couldn't make this shit up)...
Yeah, it's prolly more like 456.Let's start with lie number one. Your title: Great List of 115 liberal lies about Trump.115 Media Mistakes in the Trump Era: The Definitive List | Sharyl Attkisson
Let’s take them one at a time.
She called out the media for mistakes and missteps. She even admits int he first paragraph that Trump has given us "plenty to write about."
It is the height of irony that you call out so-called "liberal lies, by blatantly lying on the title as to what Attkisson wrote.
You really can't make this up.
the point is - and you are trying to gloss over it - the press makes a TON of mistakes in big bold headlines you eat up with a spoon. when proven wrong, is their OOPS of the same variety in WE MESSED UP?
no. seldom if ever.
and to mess up 115 times?
pu-leez.
The point is they keep making them.the point is - and you are trying to gloss over it - the press makes a TON of mistakes in big bold headlines you eat up with a spoon. when proven wrong, is their OOPS of the same variety in WE MESSED UP?
no. seldom if ever.
and to mess up 115 times?
pu-leez.
The point is they do apologise and correct their error. 115 times? is that all. Out of the hundreds of thousands - and I mean hundreds of thousands - of articles and news stories, there are only 115 mistakes on the Trumpster? Even then, as I pointed out in my example, it's a stretch to call it a lie. Some are just genuine mistakes. In a social media world it is happening more often.
The point is they keep making them.the point is - and you are trying to gloss over it - the press makes a TON of mistakes in big bold headlines you eat up with a spoon. when proven wrong, is their OOPS of the same variety in WE MESSED UP?
no. seldom if ever.
and to mess up 115 times?
pu-leez.
The point is they do apologise and correct their error. 115 times? is that all. Out of the hundreds of thousands - and I mean hundreds of thousands - of articles and news stories, there are only 115 mistakes on the Trumpster? Even then, as I pointed out in my example, it's a stretch to call it a lie. Some are just genuine mistakes. In a social media world it is happening more often.
Let's see you call Trump's statements mistakes now.
They are in bash mode. They are not checking facts. They are feeding you what you want to eat.
OK I appreciate just talking about it. Thank you.The point is they keep making them.the point is - and you are trying to gloss over it - the press makes a TON of mistakes in big bold headlines you eat up with a spoon. when proven wrong, is their OOPS of the same variety in WE MESSED UP?
no. seldom if ever.
and to mess up 115 times?
pu-leez.
The point is they do apologise and correct their error. 115 times? is that all. Out of the hundreds of thousands - and I mean hundreds of thousands - of articles and news stories, there are only 115 mistakes on the Trumpster? Even then, as I pointed out in my example, it's a stretch to call it a lie. Some are just genuine mistakes. In a social media world it is happening more often.
Let's see you call Trump's statements mistakes now.
They are in bash mode. They are not checking facts. They are feeding you what you want to eat.
I do agree that fact checking and proof reading have gone out the window. I think a lot of these are genuine mistakes, not lies. However, the Donald lies all the time. Not mistakes. Lies. There is a difference.
OK I appreciate just talking about it. Thank you.The point is they keep making them.the point is - and you are trying to gloss over it - the press makes a TON of mistakes in big bold headlines you eat up with a spoon. when proven wrong, is their OOPS of the same variety in WE MESSED UP?
no. seldom if ever.
and to mess up 115 times?
pu-leez.
The point is they do apologise and correct their error. 115 times? is that all. Out of the hundreds of thousands - and I mean hundreds of thousands - of articles and news stories, there are only 115 mistakes on the Trumpster? Even then, as I pointed out in my example, it's a stretch to call it a lie. Some are just genuine mistakes. In a social media world it is happening more often.
Let's see you call Trump's statements mistakes now.
They are in bash mode. They are not checking facts. They are feeding you what you want to eat.
I do agree that fact checking and proof reading have gone out the window. I think a lot of these are genuine mistakes, not lies. However, the Donald lies all the time. Not mistakes. Lies. There is a difference.
However, my minor was journalism. I would be fired if I made this many mistakes, as I should be. It's their job to research before reporting and they simply are not doing that. Their goal is smear Trump. As journalism isn't supposed to be biased, this bugs me. Reporters are trying to be a part of the news or story far too often. Many are more like sports color commentators anymore.
I hate it.
And Donald exaggerates to his benefit all the time, yes. Cal it whatever you like but give him the same leeway you are giving reporters. At least I would try to do that.