GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik won’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results: “We will see if this is a legal and valid election,”

[MAGA Macho Man]

Great move and a smart move. It won't be like what took place in 2020.

GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik won’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results

“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Kilroy2]

So just how is she going to determine this. She going to count all the votes?

Still how can someone make such a statement before the election. It clearly shows bias.

If she can't do her job without being bias then she should be removed from office

 

[Concerned American]

Still how can someone make such a statement before the election. It clearly shows bias.

By the same token, how can you make a commitment to certify BEFORE the election is held. SMH. You don't really think before you post do you?

 

[Natural Citizen]

Well, one thing that the secretaries of state are definitely not gonna get away with again is circumventing the state legislatures and unilaterally and unconstitutionally changing election laws the way that they did last time around.

Nor will the Republican legislatures who let them get away with circumventing them.

 

[Concerned American]

Well, one thing that the secretaries of state are definitely not gonna get away with again is circumventing the state legislatures and unilaterally and unconstitutionally changing election laws the way that they did last time around.

Nor will the Republican legislatures who let them get away with circumventing them.

Looks like the SOS in Maine has already proven that ^^ wrong----so far.

 

[Kilroy2]

By the same token, how can you make a commitment to certify BEFORE the election is held. SMH. You don't really think before you post do you?

Her job is to certify or don't. There is no need for a broadcast in advance unless their is another motive involve here . She was a supporter of the election stolen theory. There is even talk of her being Trumps VP

in fact she did not certify the 2020 election results according to the story

she says that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

After Welker pressed her again on the matter, Stefanik wouldn’t commit to certifying the election results and criticized efforts to remove Trump from the ballot in Colorado, Maine and other states.

Welker noted that she didn’t hear Stefanik commit to certifying the election results before asking, “Will you only commit to certifying the results if former President Trump wins? Does that mean only if former President Trump wins?”

My suggestion would be to read the story and not just the headlines.

or that she is a Trump supporter

She mad because Colorado has removed Trump and is jumping into the fray.

She is displaying bias in advance

Just another Trump supporter

 

[Crepitus]

Great move and a smart move. It won't be like what took place in 2020.

GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik won’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results

“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

www.nbcnews.com

I started this thread with a different slant and got consigned to the badlands.

 

[Kilroy2]

By the same token, how can you make a commitment to certify BEFORE the election is held. SMH. You don't really think before you post do you?

That her job. Either to certify or not to certify.

Broadcasting such a statement show extreme bias and really just a knee jerk reaction because Trump lost and she believes something else. In fact it just shows that she believes Trump won.

She can't do her job based on such a stupid statement before the election

 

[Concerned American]

There is no need for a broadcast in advance unless their is another motive involve here

The democrat mouthpiece host of Meet the Press asked the question. She answered it. If she had said anything else you would have whined that she was evading. She answered the question honestly and you are trying to make hay out of it which is the true dis-ingenuity of the matter. At this point it would be wrong to commit either way.

She was a supporter of the election stolen theory. There is even talk of her being Trumps VP

Speculation. Look out the sky is falling. SMH.

Stefanik wouldn’t commit to certifying the election results and criticized efforts to remove Trump

Why wouldn't she. CO and ME have overstepped their authority and are denying Trump due process in violation of the US constitution.

“Will you only commit to certifying the results if former President Trump wins? Does that mean only if former President Trump wins?”

I think she was very clear and Welker's introduction of BS in the interview is a distraction. More political theater from MTP. Getting rid of Todd didn't change the partisan nature of the show.

or that she is a Trump supporter

So what, Welker is a democrat Biden supporter--there is that. SMFH

She is displaying bias in advance

Just another Trump supporter

Yeah, LMAO, your partisanship is very evident. You're just another moron, anti-American Biden supporter

 

[Kilroy2]

The democrat mouthpiece host of Meet the Press asked the question. She answered it. If she had said anything else you would have whined that she was evading. She answered the question honestly and you are trying to make hay out of it which is the true dis-ingenuity of the matter. At this point it would be wrong to commit either way.

Speculation. Look out the sky is falling. SMH.

Why wouldn't she. CO and ME have overstepped their authority and are denying Trump due process in violation of the US constitution.

I think she was very clear and Welker's introduction of BS in the interview is a distraction. More political theater from MTP. Getting rid of Todd didn't change the partisan nature of the show.

So what, Welker is a democrat Biden supporter--there is that. SMFH

Yeah, LMAO, your partisanship is very evident. You're just another moron, anti-American Biden supporter

She could have said that she would do the job to the best of her abilities or some line that she would do her job.

She is to bias and cannot take a middle road approach as she represents the people of her state.

You say speculation but your next sentence show its not speculation.

Yet Trump violated the constitution

If she was out of her league, then she should have gone to FOX. Still in her position, reporters will be aggressive to get that slip of the tongue

So the reporter manipulated her into saying want she truly believes instead of being politically correct.


Its better than being a Trump supporter and have to defend him

 

[Zincwarrior]

Great move and a smart move. It won't be like what took place in 2020.

GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik won’t commit to certifying the 2024 election results

“We will see if this is a legal and valid election,” Stefanik, a member of House GOP leadership and a Donald Trump ally, said in an interview with “Meet the Press.”

www.nbcnews.com

Hang her too. Death to traitors.

 

[Concerned American]

She could have said that she would do the job to the best of her abilities or some line that she would do her job.

She did. She just didn't parrot the BS that you wanted to hear.

She is to bias and cannot take a middle road approach

You're a bit hypocritical as you and Welker have demonstrated that neither of you--like the globalist/democrat party, can take the middle road as you all have demonstrated for seven solid years.

You say speculation but your next sentence show its not speculation.

If it isn't speculation, please link to anything that substantiates your position that she would be the pick for VP. The only place it lives is in your own addled mind.

Yet Trump violated the constitution

Another lie. Please link to the conviction and not the panic porn that lives in your mind.

So the reporter manipulated her into saying want she truly believes instead of being politically correct.

She spoke the truth. She wouldn't commit to ruling either way. Only a democrat would try to use pretzel logic to twist it.

Its better than being a Trump supporter and have to defend him

I am not defending him. He can do that himself. The incompetent democrats will keep howling at the moon trying to find something.....anything that will stick to the wall and prevent their vegetable from being shown the door. Why are you defending this obvious dumpster fire in the WH?

 

[scruffy]

She could have said that she would do the job to the best of her abilities or some line that she would do her job.

She is to bias and cannot take a middle road approach as she represents the people of her state.

You say speculation but your next sentence show its not speculation.

Yet Trump violated the constitution

If she was out of her league, then she should have gone to FOX. Still in her position, reporters will be aggressive to get that slip of the tongue

So the reporter manipulated her into saying want she truly believes instead of being politically correct.


Its better than being a Trump supporter and have to defend him

Biggest bunch of UTTER HORSESHIT I've seen on this forum today.

The libtards are lying their asses off.

They must be getting desperate.

Because they're losing in EVERY poll, and SCOTUS is about to ***** slap their sorry asses.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Looks like the SOS in Maine has already proven that ^^ wrong----so far.

Well they're certainly gonna try. There's no doubt about that. The Main Secretary is the first example of tossing the bobber out there thus far.

But they won't get away with that this time around. I don't thnk so anyway.

 

[Kilroy2]

Biggest bunch of UTTER HORSESHIT I've seen on this forum today.

The libtards are lying their asses off.

They must be getting desperate.

Because they're losing in EVERY poll, and SCOTUS is about to ***** slap their sorry asses.

read your post fast 3 times to yourself and then get some mouthwash

Trump shares bizarre video declaring 'God made Trump,' suggesting he is embracing a messianic image

Former President Trump shared a fan-made video declaring that he was divinely chosen to lead the country.

www.businessinsider.com

your messiah awaits your sacrifice.

 

[Concerned American]

read your post fast 3 times to yourself and then get some mouthwash

Trump shares bizarre video declaring 'God made Trump,' suggesting he is embracing a messianic image

Former President Trump shared a fan-made video declaring that he was divinely chosen to lead the country.

www.businessinsider.com

your messiah awaits your sacrifice.

Your messiah has sacrificed the US. Proud of yourself?

 

[22lcidw]

She could have said that she would do the job to the best of her abilities or some line that she would do her job.

She is to bias and cannot take a middle road approach as she represents the people of her state.

You say speculation but your next sentence show its not speculation.

Yet Trump violated the constitution

If she was out of her league, then she should have gone to FOX. Still in her position, reporters will be aggressive to get that slip of the tongue

So the reporter manipulated her into saying want she truly believes instead of being politically correct.


Its better than being a Trump supporter and have to defend him

If Trump wins, I guarantee you there are going to be Prog politicians screaming to no end. They made their threats in 2016 after Trump won. We spent 4 years with Progs and their media/entertainers destroying Trump every day. If there is justice, they will receive it in any way that supports it.

 

[Kilroy2]

If Trump wins, I guarantee you there are going to be Prog politicians screaming to no end. They made their threats in 2016 after Trump won. We spent 4 years with Progs and their media/entertainers destroying Trump every day. If there is justice, they will receive it in any way that supports it.

Justice is blind but Trump cannot escape it because he thinks that he is invisible. He stepped into the light and people can see who he really is.

“Fate is like a strange, unpopular restaurant filled with odd little waiters who bring you things you never asked for and don't always like.”
― Lemony Snicket

 

[skews13]

Her job is to certify or don't. There is no need for a broadcast in advance unless their is another motive involve here . She was a supporter of the election stolen theory. There is even talk of her being Trumps VP

in fact she did not certify the 2020 election results according to the story

she says that she did not vote to certify the 2020 results in the state of Pennsylvania and several other states because there were “unconstitutional acts circumventing the state legislature and unilaterally changing election law.”

After Welker pressed her again on the matter, Stefanik wouldn’t commit to certifying the election results and criticized efforts to remove Trump from the ballot in Colorado, Maine and other states.

Welker noted that she didn’t hear Stefanik commit to certifying the election results before asking, “Will you only commit to certifying the results if former President Trump wins? Does that mean only if former President Trump wins?”

My suggestion would be to read the story and not just the headlines.

or that she is a Trump supporter

She mad because Colorado has removed Trump and is jumping into the fray.

She is displaying bias in advance

Just another Trump supporter

What she certifies, or not is irrelevant. Just like the last time. They lost 60 different court cases plus the Supreme Court.

And that's all that matters in the end.

The electors will be the certified electors

They will certify what the popular vote count final is

There are no alternate electors

There are no alternate rules decided by state legislators