GOP Congressman Steve King Faces Backlash for Asking Kamala Harris if She Is Descended From 'Slaves or Slave Owners'

Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
The “black” side of her family is white Jamaicans, who owned slaves.
Post the link.
Kamala's paternal great grandmother Christiana Brown Harris, was a black store keeper in Brown's Town, Jamaica, founded by Hamilton Brown, an Irish immigrant to Jamaica (born 1776 died 1843) who ended up owning over 100 slaves. The genealogists haven't caught up with this, although I'm sure they're working on it now that she's VP. Christiana always claimed to be Brown's descendant.

The fact that Christiana, her son Oscar, his son Donald and his daughter Kamala are all various tones of black makes it pretty clear that the great great great Irish grandfather Hamilton Brown, slave owner, raped one of his female slaves. Fact checkers say the line hasn't been confirmed. It may never be, unless a lot of DNA testing gets done, as it was in the case of the black descendants of Thomas Jefferson. It's not always easy proving slave lineage.

So Kamala comes from the union of an unidentified female slave and a white slave owner that makes up 1/32 of her line. I'm pretty sure whoever Christiana's parents and grandparents were, they weren't living in the mansion house on old Hamilton's riches.
Do you have any links to any of this or did this come from some right wing blog.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
The “black” side of her family is white Jamaicans, who owned slaves.
Post the link.
Kamala's paternal great grandmother Christiana Brown Harris, was a black store keeper in Brown's Town, Jamaica, founded by Hamilton Brown, an Irish immigrant to Jamaica (born 1776 died 1843) who ended up owning over 100 slaves. The genealogists haven't caught up with this, although I'm sure they're working on it now that she's VP. Christiana always claimed to be Brown's descendant.

The fact that Christiana, her son Oscar, his son Donald and his daughter Kamala are all various tones of black makes it pretty clear that the great great great Irish grandfather Hamilton Brown, slave owner, raped one of his female slaves. Fact checkers say the line hasn't been confirmed. It may never be, unless a lot of DNA testing gets done, as it was in the case of the black descendants of Thomas Jefferson. It's not always easy proving slave lineage.

So Kamala comes from the union of an unidentified female slave and a white slave owner that makes up 1/32 of her line. I'm pretty sure whoever Christiana's parents and grandparents were, they weren't living in the mansion house on old Hamilton's riches.
And this is why she had to become a whore?
“It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”
She’s a whore. Deal with it and stop excusing it.
Please let's not speak of whores, we can start at the White..........nevermind.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
The “black” side of her family is white Jamaicans, who owned slaves.
Post the link.
Kamala's paternal great grandmother Christiana Brown Harris, was a black store keeper in Brown's Town, Jamaica, founded by Hamilton Brown, an Irish immigrant to Jamaica (born 1776 died 1843) who ended up owning over 100 slaves. The genealogists haven't caught up with this, although I'm sure they're working on it now that she's VP. Christiana always claimed to be Brown's descendant.

The fact that Christiana, her son Oscar, his son Donald and his daughter Kamala are all various tones of black makes it pretty clear that the great great great Irish grandfather Hamilton Brown, slave owner, raped one of his female slaves. Fact checkers say the line hasn't been confirmed. It may never be, unless a lot of DNA testing gets done, as it was in the case of the black descendants of Thomas Jefferson. It's not always easy proving slave lineage.

So Kamala comes from the union of an unidentified female slave and a white slave owner that makes up 1/32 of her line. I'm pretty sure whoever Christiana's parents and grandparents were, they weren't living in the mansion house on old Hamilton's riches.
And this is why she had to become a whore?
“It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”
She’s a whore. Deal with it and stop excusing it.
Only way a black woman could possibly do well and become a successful, powerful woman, hey? She's got to be sucking someone's dick.
Is that how you have got ahead as a white woman?
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
24,826
Reaction score
6,224
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
 

Godboy

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
19,972
Reaction score
5,738
Points
280
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
They are one of the few families in the US who benefitted from having slaves.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
They are one of the few families in the US who benefitted from having slaves.
Bullshit, America benefitted from having slaves.
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
24,826
Reaction score
6,224
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
24,826
Reaction score
6,224
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
That’s a money thing. Whenever a black has to depend on a public defender it’s not gonna be good.
What’s more, blacks commit significantly more crime per capita so the problem has less to do with the justice system and more to do with no daddies. Another racialist bullshit propaganda contrivance.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
That’s a money thing. Whenever a black has to depend on a public defender it’s not gonna be good.
Bullshit, there are black folks with money who go to jail everyday.
{quote]
What’s more, blacks commit significantly more crime per capita so the problem has less to do with the justice system and more to do with no daddies. Another racialist bullshit propaganda contrivance.
[/QUOTE]

More bullshit on your part. The Justice System has been racist against black folks since this country was founded, history shows that.
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
24,826
Reaction score
6,224
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
That’s a money thing. Whenever a black has to depend on a public defender it’s not gonna be good.
Bullshit, there are black folks with money who go to jail everyday.
{quote]
What’s more, blacks commit significantly more crime per capita so the problem has less to do with the justice system and more to do with no daddies. Another racialist bullshit propaganda contrivance.
More bullshit on your part. The Justice System has been racist against black folks since this country was founded, history shows that.
[/QUOTE]
You’re parroting lefty propaganda.
Blacks commit more crimes because of no daddies. Do a head count at a penitentiary.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
71,973
Reaction score
15,063
Points
2,220
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
The “black” side of her family is white Jamaicans, who owned slaves.
Post the link.
Kamala's paternal great grandmother Christiana Brown Harris, was a black store keeper in Brown's Town, Jamaica, founded by Hamilton Brown, an Irish immigrant to Jamaica (born 1776 died 1843) who ended up owning over 100 slaves. The genealogists haven't caught up with this, although I'm sure they're working on it now that she's VP. Christiana always claimed to be Brown's descendant.

The fact that Christiana, her son Oscar, his son Donald and his daughter Kamala are all various tones of black makes it pretty clear that the great great great Irish grandfather Hamilton Brown, slave owner, raped one of his female slaves. Fact checkers say the line hasn't been confirmed. It may never be, unless a lot of DNA testing gets done, as it was in the case of the black descendants of Thomas Jefferson. It's not always easy proving slave lineage.

So Kamala comes from the union of an unidentified female slave and a white slave owner that makes up 1/32 of her line. I'm pretty sure whoever Christiana's parents and grandparents were, they weren't living in the mansion house on old Hamilton's riches.
And this is why she had to become a whore?
“It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”
She’s a whore. Deal with it and stop excusing it.
Please let's not speak of whores, we can start at the White..........nevermind.

A woman who gets paid in money (or a job) for sex is a whore. THe man that pays for it, is a whoremonger.

Harris built her career on having sex in exchange for help with her career.

What part of this do you not understand?
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
71,973
Reaction score
15,063
Points
2,220
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
That’s a money thing. Whenever a black has to depend on a public defender it’s not gonna be good.
Bullshit, there are black folks with money who go to jail everyday.
{quote]
What’s more, blacks commit significantly more crime per capita so the problem has less to do with the justice system and more to do with no daddies. Another racialist bullshit propaganda contrivance.
More bullshit on your part. The Justice System has been racist against black folks since this country was founded, history shows that.
[/QUOTE]


Wacism. lol!!!

Dude. No matter what you do, or who you throw under the bus, all you have is blaming other people for your actions.


Nothing you do, along the lines of blaming whitey, will even fix problems that are not actually caused by whitey.


So all you doing, is making sure that your people will always suffer the same issues.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
That’s a money thing. Whenever a black has to depend on a public defender it’s not gonna be good.
Bullshit, there are black folks with money who go to jail everyday.
{quote]
What’s more, blacks commit significantly more crime per capita so the problem has less to do with the justice system and more to do with no daddies. Another racialist bullshit propaganda contrivance.
More bullshit on your part. The Justice System has been racist against black folks since this country was founded, history shows that.
You’re parroting lefty propaganda.
Blacks commit more crimes because of no daddies. Do a head count at a penitentiary.
[/QUOTE]

More false garbage by a racist, whites commit more crime and are the least incarcerated for it.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
8,807
Reaction score
1,450
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
The “black” side of her family is white Jamaicans, who owned slaves.
Post the link.
Kamala's paternal great grandmother Christiana Brown Harris, was a black store keeper in Brown's Town, Jamaica, founded by Hamilton Brown, an Irish immigrant to Jamaica (born 1776 died 1843) who ended up owning over 100 slaves. The genealogists haven't caught up with this, although I'm sure they're working on it now that she's VP. Christiana always claimed to be Brown's descendant.

The fact that Christiana, her son Oscar, his son Donald and his daughter Kamala are all various tones of black makes it pretty clear that the great great great Irish grandfather Hamilton Brown, slave owner, raped one of his female slaves. Fact checkers say the line hasn't been confirmed. It may never be, unless a lot of DNA testing gets done, as it was in the case of the black descendants of Thomas Jefferson. It's not always easy proving slave lineage.

So Kamala comes from the union of an unidentified female slave and a white slave owner that makes up 1/32 of her line. I'm pretty sure whoever Christiana's parents and grandparents were, they weren't living in the mansion house on old Hamilton's riches.
And this is why she had to become a whore?
“It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”
She’s a whore. Deal with it and stop excusing it.
Please let's not speak of whores, we can start at the White..........nevermind.

A woman who gets paid in money (or a job) for sex is a whore. THe man that pays for it, is a whoremonger.

Harris built her career on having sex in exchange for help with her career.

What part of this do you not understand?
Well it sounds like you could take that analogy to the WH.
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
24,826
Reaction score
6,224
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
What a stupid question. Does he have a point?

Besides the fact that it doesn't matter....
It’s a very legit point.
Time to differentiate between actual victims and democrat affirmative action contrivances.
Regardless of who her great-great grandfather was, she has lived her life with the stigma of black skin, and therefore, she knows what it's about. Who some old dead ancestor from long ago is, is a preposterous point. IMO.
Not stigma — benefit.
The hypocrisy being that her skin color in her case had no lineage to slavery. Slave ownership but not slavery. Just like Obama. Kenyans had very little involvement with slavery and those who did were traders and sellers of slaves.
Democrats don’t like logic.
Idiot how was she treated while she was growing up, I bet it wasn't like a slave owner. Maybe she should use the excuse you guys use. My folks didn't get here until after slavery.
She came from privilege. Her sob stories are more post-civil-rights bullshit excuse-making.
What is privilege? All black folks are pretty much treated in the same manner in this country.
That's absurd. I don't treat all Black people alike and I don't even know anyone who does. You, my man, have a chip on your shoulder
Oh the Angry Black man, right.
Pretty much.
Why are we angry?
Because you’re brainwashed bigots.
If that is the case then why are we always on the receiving side of the bigotry?
It’s propaganda. The only bigotry you face is from marginal extremists, democrat race hustlers and democrat soft core white supremacists.
Yea that is the lie you keep trying to tell, sorry black folks aren't buying that bullshit.
No, it’s empirical reality.
You’re not aware of Black Lives Matter and its violent, hateful contrivance?
BLM is not making public policy that AFFECTS anyone, you have examples of some rogue folks who have taken matters into their own hands against others and they have been brought to the Bar of Justice. It took Constitutional Amendments to STOP the wrongs that were being done to black folks.
55 years ago and they’ve been re-segregating themselves ever since.
55yrs ago and we are still dealing with some of the same injustices that black folks dealt with in 1920.
Name one. I dare you.
The Justice System for starters.
That’s a money thing. Whenever a black has to depend on a public defender it’s not gonna be good.
Bullshit, there are black folks with money who go to jail everyday.
{quote]
What’s more, blacks commit significantly more crime per capita so the problem has less to do with the justice system and more to do with no daddies. Another racialist bullshit propaganda contrivance.
More bullshit on your part. The Justice System has been racist against black folks since this country was founded, history shows that.
You’re parroting lefty propaganda.
Blacks commit more crimes because of no daddies. Do a head count at a penitentiary.
More false garbage by a racist, whites commit more crime and are the least incarcerated for it.
[/QUOTE]
Not per capita. Refer to the point about money once you sift beyond the black/fatherless element.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
71,973
Reaction score
15,063
Points
2,220
I think his point is, Kamala wants points for her families racial heritage, but she is silent when it comes to her families history of slavery. She cant have it both ways. Either there is importance in her history or there isnt.
What is her families history on slavery?
The “black” side of her family is white Jamaicans, who owned slaves.
Post the link.
Kamala's paternal great grandmother Christiana Brown Harris, was a black store keeper in Brown's Town, Jamaica, founded by Hamilton Brown, an Irish immigrant to Jamaica (born 1776 died 1843) who ended up owning over 100 slaves. The genealogists haven't caught up with this, although I'm sure they're working on it now that she's VP. Christiana always claimed to be Brown's descendant.

The fact that Christiana, her son Oscar, his son Donald and his daughter Kamala are all various tones of black makes it pretty clear that the great great great Irish grandfather Hamilton Brown, slave owner, raped one of his female slaves. Fact checkers say the line hasn't been confirmed. It may never be, unless a lot of DNA testing gets done, as it was in the case of the black descendants of Thomas Jefferson. It's not always easy proving slave lineage.

So Kamala comes from the union of an unidentified female slave and a white slave owner that makes up 1/32 of her line. I'm pretty sure whoever Christiana's parents and grandparents were, they weren't living in the mansion house on old Hamilton's riches.
And this is why she had to become a whore?
“It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt”
She’s a whore. Deal with it and stop excusing it.
Please let's not speak of whores, we can start at the White..........nevermind.

A woman who gets paid in money (or a job) for sex is a whore. THe man that pays for it, is a whoremonger.

Harris built her career on having sex in exchange for help with her career.

What part of this do you not understand?
Well it sounds like you could take that analogy to the WH.

That's not an analogy. It is two separate concepts.


Harris is a whore. Trump, in the past, was a whore monger.


I acknowledge Trump's lustful ways as serious flaws.


Are you capable of similar honesty with Harris?
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top