Ghislaine Maxwell "exonerated" everyone.

[Crepitus]

You should look up the term "cognitive dissonance" before foolishly misusing it again, kid.

LOL, pretty sure I'm not, Son.

 

[Auld Phart]

You know all convicts are innocent.

that's what most of them told me.

but, there were a few 'honest' ones.

one came in bragging about all the rapes he had done in Dayton.

found out really quick that one of his dorm mates mother had been raped in that area.

he was back out the door before he finished unpacking.

 

[Auld Phart]

Ghislaine Maxwell denies Trump or Clinton were involved in Epstein's crimes, interview transcript shows

The US Justice Department has released a transcript of its July interview with the socialite.

www.bbc.com

sorry, read several articles on this before posting. I though that one mentioned him.

Try this one.

And stop being such a nit-picky little ***** for a change. All that info is out there being discussed, you could have easily verified it yourself.

I'm not doing your homework, reacher

 

[Crepitus]

The whole house is infested with pedos...

That might be overstating the case a bit...

 

[Crepitus]

Why aren’t there any victims telling the media that Trump was involved?

There have been many.

 

[Mac1958]

She doesn't want to piss off tRump or incriminate herself further so she's just saying it never happened.

And possibly angling for a payday to keep quiet once her pardon comes through in a year or two.

The ease with which an ugly, high-profile case like this can just fade away just shows how warped our legal system is.

And once politics touches something, it's worse. This shouldn't have anything to do with politics.

 

[Crepitus]

Really? Tell us how many Democrats are guilty, by your definition of a guilt, while they hung out with Weinstein?

Should we lock Clinton for her role of providing aid and comfort to the rapist Weinstein?

What about Clooney and Damon? Should we lock these two leftist celebrities for their role of covering up for Weinstein?

Weinstein wasn't a pimp. He wasn't providing services for others.

 

[okfine]

The ease with which an ugly, high-profile case like this can just fade away just shows how warped our legal system is.

And once politics touches something, it's worse. This shouldn't have anything to do with politics.

It's not going away.

 

[okfine]

Weinstein wasn't a pimp. He wasn't providing services for others.

Notice how the tards never say anything against Trump. It's always somebody else.

 

[leftwinger]

It's not going away.

It will be gone when the whole board puts you on ignore. Want to be my first one ever yo hog tied mush mouthed hillbilly beagle breathed old cow?

 

[leftwinger]

Got any proof? Then STHU you stupid black tounged tree snakes.//

 

[Invisibleflash]

According to her, not only is trump innocent but so are Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, as well at Epstein himself.

So if you want to believe trump is innocent you have to believe they are as well.

Or you could just admit there's no way in hell she can be trusted to tell the truth.

Which is it, guys? Are they all innocent?

Are they all guilty?

Or are we just right back where we started with no one knowing anything yet?

Here's a link to what we all already know just to keep within the thread creations guidelines.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ghislaine-maxwell-told-doj-she-is-unaware-any-epstein-client-list-2025-08-23/

Just lies and more lies from TPTB.

 

[Auld Phart]

Notice how the tards never say anything against Trump. It's always somebody else.

I've noticed the only supposed pedos dems are concerned with is trump.

no mention of Clinton, a good friend of Epstein, Prince Andrew, or Joe Biden, who has shown in interest in young females.

proof Trump is their whole world.

 

[Orangecat]

LOL, pretty sure I'm not, Son.

You're pretty sure women can have dicks, too. Educate yourself, kid.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

According to her, not only is trump innocent but so are Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, as well at Epstein himself.

So if you want to believe trump is innocent you have to believe they are as well.

Or you could just admit there's no way in hell she can be trusted to tell the truth.

Which is it, guys? Are they all innocent?

Are they all guilty?

Or are we just right back where we started with no one knowing anything yet?

Here's a link to what we all already know just to keep within the thread creations guidelines.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ghislaine-maxwell-told-doj-she-is-unaware-any-epstein-client-list-2025-08-23/

Since Prince Andrew settled out of court with Virginia Giuffre over her sexual assault lawsuit, seems pretty stupid of her to say he didn't.

As for any information available, there are pictures of Clinton with atleast one of Epsteins victims, getting a neck rub(?) And he was a frequent flyer, as well as Epstein saying he liked them young.

Epstein victim told Clinton ‘likes them young’ as explosive doc dump name-drops 170 of infamous pedophile’s visitors, including Michael Jackson


As for Trump.......so far there hasn't been any evidence of any wrong doing, it's all been speculation based on 'guilt by association'. Doesn't mean he's guilty, and doesn't mean he's innocent either. Just no proof either way.



As for your link........there is no 'client list' that suggests everyone he knew participated in his perversions.



All in all.......anyone with half a brain knows we really don't know shit about the full scope of Epstein and those who knew him or what he or they were involved in.........OTHER THAN EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL WERE/ARE GUILTY OF EXPLOITATION, TRAFFICKING AND SEX ABUSE OF MINORS,.........beyond that, it's all been speculation

 

[Votto]

According to her, not only is trump innocent but so are Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, as well at Epstein himself.

So if you want to believe trump is innocent you have to believe they are as well.

Or you could just admit there's no way in hell she can be trusted to tell the truth.

Which is it, guys? Are they all innocent?

Are they all guilty?

Or are we just right back where we started with no one knowing anything yet?

Here's a link to what we all already know just to keep within the thread creations guidelines.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ghislaine-maxwell-told-doj-she-is-unaware-any-epstein-client-list-2025-08-23/

Trump had a falling out with Epstein after he caught wind of what he was up to, but I don't recall Bill Clinton or Prince Andrew ever giving him the boot.

 

[MisterBeale]

Right, because she plead out of it means it never happened, lol

I've been meaning to talk to you about this bridge I have for sale....

No, it means nothing she says can be trusted.

Are you really this dumb?

 

[MisterBeale]

And you're willing to believe hookers trolling for big payday with lawyers guiding them. Yes they weren't 15 by trial.

You'd be OK if they screwed with football players at age 15. They weren't confined. They could leave or call home.

You're a bunch of phonies.

There are real abused girls out there.

I thought you had more integrity than to victim blame.

You have no proof any of them were "hookers."

"You'd be OK if they screwed with football players at age 15."

I believe you should either justify this stawman/poisoning the well fallacy, or shut the hell up.

 

[ThisIsMe]

According to her, not only is trump innocent but so are Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, as well at Epstein himself.

So if you want to believe trump is innocent you have to believe they are as well.

Or you could just admit there's no way in hell she can be trusted to tell the truth.

Which is it, guys? Are they all innocent?

Are they all guilty?

Or are we just right back where we started with no one knowing anything yet?

Here's a link to what we all already know just to keep within the thread creations guidelines.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ghislaine-maxwell-told-doj-she-is-unaware-any-epstein-client-list-2025-08-23/

I dont want her words, I want to see the files. That place also had cameras all over so you know there is footage of high profile people there. We need to know about that.

 

[MisterBeale]

If a known liar says 2+2=4, what do you do? Dispute them?

But you haven't got a shred of evidence that this perjurer is telling the truth about anything, it is just yoar feels.