Get government out of my fucking snatch.



Amen, Julia! I totally agree! What do you think?

OIP.VvZO1BweSx0M2IUCG1OfNQHaE7


That uterus dried-up long ago.....The bitch is 63.

Speaking of which.....I've seen pro-abortion political ads where Bubba Clinton would not fuck those dried-up old hags.

I fully support the utility of abortion but damn, at least show us some women who are not suffering from hot flashes going on about their right to choose.

Nature done took their choice away, not SCOTUS or the gop.....And thank goodness for that!
 
Really? Her uterus doesn't --

Require a background check
Or a license to carry
Isn’t banned in federal buildings
Not banned in schools
No such thing as a uterus free zone exists on state levels
She doesn't have to tell the cop who pulled her over she has a uterus
If she's in the military, she doesn't have to store her uterus at the armory
She doesn't have to give her sheriff her fingerprints to carry her uterus

A uterus doesn't need to be serialized, nor does it need the manufacturer, city and state engraved on it. Uteri also don't have length requirements or caliber requirements that could potentially make the owner a felon by simply possessing them. Uteri in CA, NY, NJ, MD, CT, MA with certain unsavory visual characteristics aren't banned. New uteri do not need to a form to purchase nor do they need a NICS background check. Uteri can also be carried across state lines and board a plane while its in your pants. Uteri are legal in all 50 states. Uteri also can be carried on your person into Mexico and Canada. You do not have to be 18/21 to purchase a uterus. You also do not lose your right to own a uterus if you are convicted of a felony. Your uterus can be taken into a bar, a church, a hospital, a casino, a courthouse, a school, a post office, and even to Disney World.

Shannyn is an idiot, and so are you.
 
True. It is the voice of the unborn baby telling you to not kill him/her. Government is merely the messenger.

We are governed in a western liberal democracy not a theocracy led by Christians who hear voices from the privacy of the womb . Mind your own damn business and save our democracy.

NotfooledbyW i Original Post Saint_Protectionist’s feeble defense of the J6 attack on American western liberal democracy by labeling it to be a PEACEFUL & PATRIOTIC and lawful use of freedom of speech is extremely dishonest. nfbw 240618 Vfthdm00001
 
We are governed in a western liberal democracy not a theocracy led by Christians who hear voices from the privacy of the womb . Mind your own damn business and save our democracy.

NotfooledbyW i Original Post Saint_Protectionist’s feeble defense of the J6 attack on American western liberal democracy by labeling it to be a PEACEFUL & PATRIOTIC and lawful use of freedom of speech is extremely dishonest. nfbw 240618 Vfthdm00001
1. I said nothing about Christianity or religion in general. Killing preborn babies is just wrong, period. Stopping abortions is the "business" of that preborn baby, who doesn't want to be killed. As I said. We are merely their messenger, and our words are the words of that person having thier life stopped.

2. I did not say the J6 activity of nonpeaceful protestors was PEACEFUL & PATRIOTIC, ......YOU said that.
I said that in Trump's speech, he told his supporters to be "PEACEFUL & PATRIOTIC"
 
Killing preborn babies is just wrong, period
Here's a thought. Figure out how to have sex and NOT get pregnant. We call it birth CONTROL.
Its none of your business unless the preborn baby is inside of you. If its not your religion what makes you feel
entitled to assign personhood to
the developing human being inside another human being’s body in order to restrict that person’s liberty regardless of the fact that she causes zero harm to you if her liberty is not restricted nor is dhe punished for termination of her own pregnancy.
 
Don't put a live human in there and they will.
Only the pregnant woman can convey personhood on the living human inside her body and it does not matter the circumstances of how it got there.

The government has no right to intervene when a woman decides not to take the risk of giving childbirth and terminates a pregnancy.

Society does not need be protected when a woman’s decision to terminate her pregnancy is perforated in safely in a professional medical setting.
 


Amen, Julia! I totally agree! What do you think?


Julia lives in California which is one of the most protective states of abortion. She'll be just fine because the decision is with the states and her state made their decision.

Legal Until Fetal Viability for California: Abortion is generally permitted up to the point of fetal viability, which is typically around 24 weeks of pregnancy. After viability, abortion is allowed if the mother’s life or health is at risk.
 
Only the pregnant woman can convey personhood on the living human inside her body and it does not matter the circumstances of how it got there.

The government has no right to intervene when a woman decides not to take the risk of giving childbirth and terminates a pregnancy.

Society does not need be protected when a woman’s decision to terminate her pregnancy is perforated in safely in a professional medical setting.
Human is a biological term, and there isn't any controversy that the unborn child is human. The only question becomes what that human life is worth, and if you ask the average pro-abort, it's not worth much at all.

Person is a legal term, and totally arbitrary. At this point, a baby is not a person until the lawyer fairy sprinkles the newborn with his magic dust after conferring with the mother.
 
Its none of your business unless the preborn baby is inside of you. If its not your religion what makes you feel
entitled to assign personhood to
the developing human being inside another human being’s body in order to restrict that person’s liberty regardless of the fact that she causes zero harm to you if her liberty is not restricted nor is dhe punished for termination of her own pregnancy.
FALSE! It is no ones' "business" more than the preborn person, to whom it is a matter of life & death. Yes, we all are entitled to assign personhood to the developing human being.

The "harm" is not to us, it is to the persons developing to be to be born. We are just the spokesmen for them. And after they are born, and grow to adulthood, they are 100% opposed (surveys have reported) to the idea of them being aborted 30 years earlier.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom