He now has signed new contracts to fly into areas where commercial airlines won't go. You need him more than he needs you.
I've been a pilot for 30 years..
If true, that is really frightening........imagining someone as delusional as you flying a plane and any moment you might hear a voice in your head telling you God wants you to fly the plane into a gay freedom day parade....
Now my position that you're delusional, is based upon the deluded advocacy wherein you claim that such which is demonstrably a 180 degree deviation from the human physiological standard is not such a deviation... it's a well established theme of your 'contributions' which are littered throughout this board.
Now, have you come to advise the Readers of this forum that you know that I am subject to psychosis?
LOL! COOL!
I doubt this is going to go all that well for you, but there's no faster way to find out than to simply ask you to sustain your position, which is bad because you have no means to do so... which is good because it sustain my position that the sexually abnormal, such as yourself, are such due to the mental disorder which causes them to believe that that which is NOT true, is true. And here you are advising the Readers of this board, that something which you have no means to sustain, thus which you have no means to 'know' is truth... ergo, that which you know to be false... IS TRUE!
Now...How cool is
THAT?
LOL! And all because you couldn't find the strength of character to simply shut the **** up until you had something truthful to say. Truly, a classic presentation of
an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder; OKA: Delusion.
OH! Well, I guess, IN FAIRNESS... I should ask you to sustain your stated position that I suffer from psychosis.
SOOooo... Syr... what is the evidence you MUST HAVE CONSIDERED WHEN YOU ADVISED THE READERS OF THIS BOARD THAT I SUFFER PSYCHOSIS?
Naturally, when you fail to offer the evidence, the Reader will reasonably conclude that you had no evidence which could have reasonably lead you to such a conclusion, therefore when you professed such, you KNEW THAT IT WAS FALSE, despite your having advanced it as truth. Therein, concluding axiomatically... that you're a contributor who is unworthy of
trust.
(... told ya it was cool.)