Originally posted by Pale Rider
That sure is a bunch of bunk comparisons matts. That's like saying, well I compare being queer to like a fire cracker and a thermo nuclear warhead. C'mooooon.
So if someone walked past you with a plaid shirt and striped pants on, you wouldn't be any more offended by that than if you walked by two guys naked, groping and grunting, locked in a butt ****? You don't think one is any worse than the other? Unbelievable.....
Homosexuality is "abnormal". That arguement has been WON by OCA and the rest of us on that side of the issue. Which I might add is shared by the VAST majority of Americans.
Now, should queers be allowed to marry? I've asked twice now, why the hell does it have to be "marriage" when they were offered all the same "LEGAL" advantages with a Civil Union? NO ONE has answered that either! And to top it off, you pro queers have argued that hell, "IT'S NOT A SIN BECAUSE THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD ANYWAY". So that BEGS the question, IF THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD, THEN WHY IN THE HELL DO THEY NEED TO BED *MARRIED*, WHEN MARRIAGE IS A HOLY MATROMY?!
There's not a GOOD answer at all for any of those questions. After 30+ pages here, I've heard NOTHING to show me queers are normal or NEED to get "married".
"So if someone walked past you with a plaid shirt and striped pants on, you wouldn't be any more offended by that than if you walked by two guys naked, groping and grunting, locked in a butt ****? You don't think one is any worse than the other?"
I already explained that when it comes to public displays of sexual behavior, there should be consistency in the law. To the extent that heterosexual sex in public should not be allowed, homosexual sex in public should not be allowed.
"Homosexuality is "abnormal". That argument has been WON by OCA and the rest of us on that side of the issue. Which I might add is shared by the VAST majority of Americans."
I already explained that behavior should not be outlawed merely because it is abnormal. I was not in the contest concerning whether or hot homosexuality is abnormal.
"Now, should queers be allowed to marry? I've asked twice now, why the hell does it have to be "marriage" when they were offered all the same "LEGAL" advantages with a Civil Union? NO ONE has answered that either!"
That argument reminds me of the "separate but equal" fight concerning racial segregation. By a different name, it would not be the same.
"And to top it off, you pro queers have argued that hell, "IT'S NOT A SIN BECAUSE THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD ANYWAY". So that BEGS the question, IF THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN GOD, THEN WHY IN THE HELL DO THEY NEED TO BED *MARRIED*, WHEN MARRIAGE IS A HOLY MATROMY?!"
Many marriages are done my Justices of the Peace. They are not always done in a church or by a church leader. Heterosexual atheists get married too.
There's not a GOOD answer at all for any of those questions. After 30+ pages here, I've heard NOTHING to show me queers are normal or NEED to get "married".