munkle
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2012
- 6,068
- 10,590
- 2,130
You need not be a military genius to to see the peril of putting a few thousand American troops in the middle of the desert in a country that has been waiting for just this day for decades. Bush Jr. went into Iraq with 150,000 US troops and 50,000 more from other countries, and it was still a bloodbath. Are the US generals such ass-kissers that they will order their men into this absolute disaster?
www.foxnews.com
"The U.S. is positioning ground-capable forces in the Middle East after Iran rejected negotiations Wednesday, as speculation grows that Washington could be preparing a decisive next phase and what a ground operation inside Iran might actually look like.
Military experts say the deployments are not a precursor to a large-scale invasion but instead position the U.S. for targeted, short-duration missions — the kind of operations that could be aimed at delivering an intended "final blow" as diplomatic off-ramps narrow. But all options for a ground campaign come with high risk, they say. "
What a US ground operation in Iran could look like as Pentagon preps for final phase
As U.S. troops deploy to the Middle East, experts outline what a potential ground operation in Iran could look like, including limited missions, risks and likely targets.
www.foxnews.com
"The U.S. is positioning ground-capable forces in the Middle East after Iran rejected negotiations Wednesday, as speculation grows that Washington could be preparing a decisive next phase and what a ground operation inside Iran might actually look like.
Military experts say the deployments are not a precursor to a large-scale invasion but instead position the U.S. for targeted, short-duration missions — the kind of operations that could be aimed at delivering an intended "final blow" as diplomatic off-ramps narrow. But all options for a ground campaign come with high risk, they say. "
Last edited:
