For those wanting to understand the wars vs Afghanistan and Iraq, here is your best source.

Robert W

Don't tread on me. Be kind to our president.
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
33,424
Reaction score
17,095
Points
1,788
Location
Redmond Oregon, USA
I have mentioned I read and own two important books. 1 is American Soldier by General Tommy Franks. Also 2. is by General Mike DeLong.

To save you reading DeLongs book, he was talking on CSPAN.

If you truly want to learn the whys and how's of both wars, watch this video.


 
Those wanting some text, reading;
From 2000-2003 Michael DeLong was deputy commander to Gen. Tommy Franks at Central Command (CENTCOM), where they oversaw U.S. operations in the war in Afghanistan and then the invasion of Iraq. In this interview, DeLong offers inside stories about those campaigns and CIA-Pentagon relations during the Afghan war, and explains why the invasion of Iraq was necessary. He also talks about why the DoD worked with Ahmad Chalabi and his own experience dealing with Doug Feith. This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted on Feb. 14, 2006.

 

Top gun tells all, takes on 'armchair generals'​

...
Compelled to set history straight, DeLong wrote Inside CentCom: The Unvarnished Truth About the Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, published in summer 2004. "I was hearing things that needed countering, and the administration wasn't doing it,'' DeLong said. "I wrote it for Middle America - for Kansas and Iowa to know what I saw, why we went to war, why we were successful.''

DeLong admits the military made mistakes and in his 200-page book details the intelligence available at each step. He reveals that pantyhose saved soldiers on horseback in Afghanistan from chapped legs.

He has no doubt Saddam Hussein hid weapons of mass destruction in Syria and Lebanon in the 48 hours before the United States began bombing.

His book is not autobiographical, even though it is written like an adventure novel. He survived more than 1,400 combat missions and 5,600 flight hours in 25 series of aircraft.

"I've been shot down three times in Vietnam, dodged sniper rounds in Somalia and in the last six months, seen improvised explosive devices (IEDs) explode in front and behind me on the road between the airport and Baghdad,'' DeLong said.
...
 

A General Speaks Out​

EXCERPTS;
...
This source is three star General Mike DeLong, USMC, who was the #2 General at CENTCOM and General Tommy Franks’ right-hand man. From the bombing of the U.S.S Cole through the fall of Baghdad, General DeLong was an active participant in planning and executing the military response. General DeLong has also been one of the most active American visitors in Iraq since his retirement. General DeLong is also the only other high-ranking General to retire (aside from General Franks), and thus is in a position to offer more insider information than others.

A GENERAL SPEAKS OUT offers what other books cannot: a military overview of what really took place during this critical time period. It reveals the inner workings within the halls of power, where life-and-death decisions were made without the benefit of hindsight. Its story is one of a kind, its timing is unique, and DeLong tells it in a manner typical of a three-star general in the U.S. Marine Corps: directly, honestly and definitively.

A GENERAL SPEAKS OUT stands alone as the definitive military account of what occurred behind the scenes of our country at war.
...
“INSIDE CENTCOM is no partisan book. DeLong is no partisan; he’s been praised by both Franks (who has endorsed President Bush’s re-election) and retired Gen. Anthony Zinni, the retired CentCom commander (a leading critic of Bush.) In 240 pages, including a lengthy appendix, DeLong manages to pack in a number of eye-popping details – including where he thinks Osama bin Laden is hiding, why he believes the Chinese, Russians, Germans and French opposed the Iraqi war (substantial financial interests, which he details), and the quick transformation of the U.S. military into a speedy, flexible fighting force that coordinated its various branches as a single, cohesive team. He also writes that he came face-to-face with a jailed Chemical Ali, came to believe Iraq most definitely had WMD and says he believes he knows where they put them….INSIDE CENTCOM lives up to its title: it’s unvarnished, and it’s a deep look into the inner workings of the Central Command and America’s war-fighting apparatus. He not only talks about the successes of the quick, overwhelming military battles in Afghanistan and Iraq, but of the miscalculations and thorny political and diplomatic issues, as well….For anyone interested in the military’s war on terror, behind-the-scenes, “Inside CentCom” is essential reading.”
–LateFinal.com
...

“Lt. Gen. Mike DeLong was Gen. Tommy Franks’ right-hand man in conceiving and executing the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. While Franks was in the field, former Marine combat pilot DeLong ran Central Command (“CentCom”), the nerve center of both wars–where he was an active participant in discussions involving President Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Franks, George Tenet, and many others. Now, Gen. DeLong offers the frankest and most authoritative look inside the wars–how we prepared for battle, how we fought, how we toppled two regimes–and what’s happening now on these two crucial fronts. INSIDE CENTCOM takes you inside the center of American defense intelligence and war planning for the greater Middle East. You’ll go behind the scenes on the stealth operations leading up to the Afghan and Iraq wars, and then read the after-action report from today’s Iraq. You’ll also get authoritative answers to questions such as: Was President Bush really focused on Iraq from the start? Were we right to attack Iraq? What intel did we have on Saddam Hussein and his WMD? How did we plan and execute these wars?”
–Human Events online
...

“[Lieutenant General Michael DeLong] and General Franks are probably the most authoritative sources on the [Afghanistan and Iraq] wars. DeLong’s book is exactly what one would expect from a Marine – clear, concise, and to the point. There is no fluff, and no sugar-coating. DeLong calls it as he sees it, and his viewpoint is one well worth paying attention to. DeLong’s book is explosive in some aspects….DeLong also lays out the reasons for a lot of the post-liberation chaos, and does so with honesty….Ultimately, DeLong’s book….provides a superb first draft of history for the initial part of the war on terrorism, far more accurate than much of the media coverage.”
–Strategy Page, Harold C. Hutchison
...

“General DeLong served as the deputy commander of Central Command, directly under General Tommy Franks, for the first several years of the Global War on Terrorism. In Inside CentCom, he provides insider details on the military’s response to September 11th, confirming, for example, that Iraq was discussed by top officials in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. He also addresses the dynamic interaction between the CIA and Special Forces troops on the ground, explaining how they worked together in conjunction with indigenous Afghans to overthrow the Taliban. He provides behind-the-scenes looks at various events widely reported in the media, such as the rescue of Private Jessica Lynch, the decision to outlaw the Ba’ath Party, and President Bush’s famous carrier landing during which “Mission Accomplished” was proclaimed. Shedding new light on the planning and operations of both campaigns, such as the role of Special Forces in Iraq before the war started, DeLong argues that the invasion was fully justified and assures the reader that weapons of mass destruction will eventually be found. He is also highly critical of Iraqi exiles like Ahmad Chalabi. Proponents of multilateralism will appreciate his discussion of coalition-building, for which he was largely responsible, and his observation that the coalition against terrorism did not suffer from the diplomatic stresses of Iraqi Freedom.”
by Jack Greer , Staff Writer
The Stanford Review
...
 
Those wanting some text, reading;
From 2000-2003 Michael DeLong was deputy commander to Gen. Tommy Franks at Central Command (CENTCOM), where they oversaw U.S. operations in the war in Afghanistan and then the invasion of Iraq. In this interview, DeLong offers inside stories about those campaigns and CIA-Pentagon relations during the Afghan war, and explains why the invasion of Iraq was necessary. He also talks about why the DoD worked with Ahmad Chalabi and his own experience dealing with Doug Feith. This is an edited transcript of an interview conducted on Feb. 14, 2006.

It went extremely well on purpose, because [of] the amount of homework that we did. We went back to Hannibal, to Genghis Kahn and the Khyber Rifles, the Brits, the Russians, [asking] who had been successful in Afghanistan. And if they were, how were they successful?

The only ones that had ever been successful in Afghanistan were the ones who had used the Afghan people, and then when the war was over, the Afghan people got to govern themselves. And we figured, well, that's the way to go. The Russian way didn't work at all because they lost 50,000 people, hundreds of airplanes and helicopters. The Brits got almost a brigade destroyed there in the Khyber Pass. And so how are we going to do this? We bring in Russian platoon commanders, company commanders that were now generals back in '79, and they walk us through what they did, the problems they had, the issues they had.

But what we did is we went through a checklist. OK, here's the things we're going to do: We're going to use the Northern Alliance army. The Taliban had just killed the revered Afghan leader [Ahmed Shah] Massoud ... on the 9th or the 10th of September [2001]. That was a key right there, when he was assassinated. So we knew we had to use a Northern Alliance army somehow to get rid of the Taliban. We knew we had to get the Afghan people behind us, which meant we probably had to get stuff in there to feed them.

We had to provide [for] how do we get the Northern Alliance army that's about the fifth the size of the Taliban army -- how do we make them successful? Well, we thought we could do it with firepower, which meant injecting special forces teams that had access to air to drop bombs, precision weapons where we wanted it, and CIA intelligence teams together with them so they had the best intelligence in the world and the best weapons in the world. The terrain was so rough, you couldn't use artillery; you had to use air. So that was our plan, to feed the Afghan people to make the Northern Alliance successful, and at the end, allow them to elect their own leaders. From one month after we went in, [Afghan President Hamid] Karzai was elected as the temporary head, one month [after] the entire war. For all practical purposes, war fighting was over.
 

For those wanting to understand the wars vs Afghanistan and Iraq ...​

American Soldier by General Tommy Franks. Also by General Mike DeLong. To save you reading .....
Yes, to save you reading don't read them at all because the answer you are looking for is the American MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX greed. It wants war so it creates war = money!
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom