excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 28,554
- 57,766
- 2,290
In the matter of a few days the MSM once again beclowned themselves.
Breathless reports about refusals with headline, then in the matter of a few days, no headlines.
www.coffeeandcovid.com
Breathless reports about refusals with headline, then in the matter of a few days, no headlines.
Between Monday and when the statement was signed on Thursday, trad-media ran scores of breathless stories about European and Asian countries āstanding up to Trump.ā For three days, foreign leaders competed to defy the American president using the strongest possible language, and media wrote glowing elegies to each and every statement of defiance as they rolled off the tickers. NBC:
...
Ha. āNeverā only lasted two days. By Thursday, Reuters published a short, stenographic piece with this bland headline (Note how the headline didnāt include the words āreversalā or āback-trackedā or āTrump Always Winsā):
Indeed, neither the Reuters article about the joint statement āor any of the other minimal coverageā quoted the leadersā previous statements of defiance, even though youād think those would provide both engagement value and needed context.
The New York Times ran a front-page headline about the refusalā but not even one dedicated piece on the reversal (it was lumped into a ālive blogā). NBC ran two separate stories and a TODAY Show segment on the rebukeā but nothing standalone on the 22 countries signing up. The Guardian published an editorial and an opinion column urging Europe to resistā then barely noticed when Europe stopped resisting.
Come on. The story āthree days after refusing, 22 nations sign upā practically writes itself. The fact that nobody wrote it proves that the editorial decision was deliberate. The original āallies refuse Trumpā story served the narrative. The subsequent āallies reverse themselvesā story would have undermined it. So the first got the spotlight, and the other got the wire service treatment.
The truth they didnāt want to report was that Trumpās pressure worked. And it worked fast. It was classic: He made them an offer they couldnāt refuse. But reporters stubbornly refused to write that story. Fine. Be that way, you ninnies. It doesnāt matter anymore, because we now have Substack and coffee blogs.
...
Ha. āNeverā only lasted two days. By Thursday, Reuters published a short, stenographic piece with this bland headline (Note how the headline didnāt include the words āreversalā or āback-trackedā or āTrump Always Winsā):
Indeed, neither the Reuters article about the joint statement āor any of the other minimal coverageā quoted the leadersā previous statements of defiance, even though youād think those would provide both engagement value and needed context.
The New York Times ran a front-page headline about the refusalā but not even one dedicated piece on the reversal (it was lumped into a ālive blogā). NBC ran two separate stories and a TODAY Show segment on the rebukeā but nothing standalone on the 22 countries signing up. The Guardian published an editorial and an opinion column urging Europe to resistā then barely noticed when Europe stopped resisting.
Come on. The story āthree days after refusing, 22 nations sign upā practically writes itself. The fact that nobody wrote it proves that the editorial decision was deliberate. The original āallies refuse Trumpā story served the narrative. The subsequent āallies reverse themselvesā story would have undermined it. So the first got the spotlight, and the other got the wire service treatment.
The truth they didnāt want to report was that Trumpās pressure worked. And it worked fast. It was classic: He made them an offer they couldnāt refuse. But reporters stubbornly refused to write that story. Fine. Be that way, you ninnies. It doesnāt matter anymore, because we now have Substack and coffee blogs.
āļø FIZZLES, FEARS, AND FLIP-FLOPSā Monday, March 23, 2026 ā C&C NEWS š¦
Macron's 'never' lasted 48 hours. Palestine condemned Iran. Hamas is 'considering' disarmament. Zelensky raced to Mar-a-Lago. And nobody is connecting the dotsā because it would make Trump look good.