Because he didn’t have enough evidence.You should include his entire reasoning on the subject.
You are lying by deception.
Merry Christmas dickhead.
That’s a lie. One of many you’ve told in this thread.
Because they didn’t have proof.
I already did but you ignored it. Shall we prove you’re lying?
It’s literally what Hur said.
That's ridiculous. We can't read minds when it comes to intent. We can't read minds at all. Possession is 9/10 of the law. I assume that Biden intended to keep them and only gave them back when asked. He had them for years
Assumptions don’t go very far in court where the standard of evidence requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right , so your intent argument is not valid. It is obvious that he would have kept the documents if not ask for them back. He had had them for years. To me that proves intent anyway. As much as anything can or as if it's even important. Possession is 9/10 of the law
Hiding documents you are allowed to have is no one’s business, and is legal.
1,000% Ratty Kudos.
He didn't say he couldn't do it, he said it would be "difficult" to do when the defense started relying on Biden's dementia
Nope. You're the one lying. An ever increasing habit with you these days.
It sure isn’t legal when you’ve received a grand jury subpoena to turn them over.
That was in dispute. You guys should have negotiated, that is the Civil thing to do.
If he has a right to them, then they have no reason to take them.
