Sayaras
Platinum Member
- Nov 13, 2023
- 5,970
- 3,667
- 938
See how the piece takes down the propaganda by TheGuardian. Brick by brick...
The Guardian's propaganda claim of an 83% [supposed] civilian death rate in Gaza is misleading and based on flawed data. The article relies on an unreliable Gaza Health Ministry report, which is controlled by Hamas, and selectively interprets Israeli military data. The ministry’s figures have a history of inaccuracies, including misreported ages and unverified casualties, while the Israeli database likely undercounts Hamas fighters.
Hamas’s tactics, such as using civilians as human shields and embedding fighters in densely populated areas, significantly contribute to civilian deaths. Yet, the Guardian downplays this, focusing only on Israel’s response, which includes evacuation efforts and attempts to minimize harm to civilians.
Furthermore, accusations of genocide[sic] are false. Israel’s actions, though tragic, do not meet the legal threshold for genocide, which requires clear intent to destroy a group. Israel’s defensive operations aim to neutralize Hamas, not to commit mass destruction.
The comparison to other conflicts like Rwanda and Srebrenica is misguided. Unlike those deliberate massacres, Gaza involves urban warfare against an entrenched enemy using civilian infrastructure for cover. The Guardian's selective reporting ignores Hamas’s responsibility in the conflict, creating a distorted narrative that paints Israel as the sole aggressor while minimizing the role of Hamas in escalating violence and endangering its own people.
Highlighted is how bias, selective reporting, and misinformation shape a narrative that unfairly vilifies Israel and overlooks the complex realities of the conflict.
__
The article:.
DEBUNKED: The Guardian claims 83% [supposed] civilian death in Gaza.
www.jfeed.com
__
And this the origin of the claim. It's self hating militant Yuval Abraham. Of course, sneaky Yuval won't post the following tweet in English. But I translated it via Google: (GAP refers to Palestinian Islamic Jihad - PIJ). Though he refuses to "believe" but it's also not journalism to omit it.
The Guardian's propaganda claim of an 83% [supposed] civilian death rate in Gaza is misleading and based on flawed data. The article relies on an unreliable Gaza Health Ministry report, which is controlled by Hamas, and selectively interprets Israeli military data. The ministry’s figures have a history of inaccuracies, including misreported ages and unverified casualties, while the Israeli database likely undercounts Hamas fighters.
Hamas’s tactics, such as using civilians as human shields and embedding fighters in densely populated areas, significantly contribute to civilian deaths. Yet, the Guardian downplays this, focusing only on Israel’s response, which includes evacuation efforts and attempts to minimize harm to civilians.
Furthermore, accusations of genocide[sic] are false. Israel’s actions, though tragic, do not meet the legal threshold for genocide, which requires clear intent to destroy a group. Israel’s defensive operations aim to neutralize Hamas, not to commit mass destruction.
The comparison to other conflicts like Rwanda and Srebrenica is misguided. Unlike those deliberate massacres, Gaza involves urban warfare against an entrenched enemy using civilian infrastructure for cover. The Guardian's selective reporting ignores Hamas’s responsibility in the conflict, creating a distorted narrative that paints Israel as the sole aggressor while minimizing the role of Hamas in escalating violence and endangering its own people.
Highlighted is how bias, selective reporting, and misinformation shape a narrative that unfairly vilifies Israel and overlooks the complex realities of the conflict.
__
The article:.
DEBUNKED: The Guardian claims 83% [supposed] civilian death in Gaza.
DEBUNKED: The Guardian claims 83% civilian death in Gaza - JFeed
The Guardian claims an 83% civilian death rate in Gaza, relying on flawed data and selective context, inflating civilian casualties to - JFeed Israel News
And this the origin of the claim. It's self hating militant Yuval Abraham. Of course, sneaky Yuval won't post the following tweet in English. But I translated it via Google: (GAP refers to Palestinian Islamic Jihad - PIJ). Though he refuses to "believe" but it's also not journalism to omit it.
Last edited:
