Exposed Anti-Semitic, Sexist, Racist Homophobe Says 1/2 of Trump Votes Racist, Sexist Homophobes

[SassyIrishLass]

She said, as an overbroad generalilzation, half of Trump supporters are....
It was a big mistake on her part, but
if you choose to put yourself in that half, that is YOUR choice.

I put myself as an American and for her to make an overbroad generalization, it thoughtless and deplorable on her part. Why do people wish to support this deplorable person and excuse and justify her over reaching mischaracterizations is mind boggling to me.

Birds of feather stick together

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

She was talking about the Alt Right lunatics. If you are part of them, yes you are deplorable.

What the hell is the Alt Right? Who runs it and who are its members?

The Alt-Right is the new Hillarybots Memo, they only started using this term after Hillary gave the speech about two weeks ago.

Now some like Hazlnut and JakeStarkey cannot make a comment without mentioning the Alt-Right, even in threads that contain little political content.

It failed out of the gate but yet a few loons on here keep trying to push it.

Who's the one who's deplorable?

 

[Tom Horn]

I feel a bit rancid, and don't smell so hot, but I think calling me deplorable is a bit of an exaggeration.

I dunno

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They do indeed. Now learn them.


"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

They do indeed. Now learn them.


"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Dumb beyond belief!
This is something a surrogate says, and is quickly refuted by the candidate themselves.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Dumb beyond belief!
This is something a surrogate says, and is quickly refuted by the candidate themselves.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They do indeed. Now learn them.


"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

What's your point?

 

[Stratford57]

Hillary and her supporters, read this attentively:

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

What's your point?

That you Leftists being pro-Islamic Apologists, think that everyone should put their heads in the sand and kiss Islamic buttocks and just go shopping or something because Islam isn't a threat to anyone.

 

[defcon4]

They do indeed. Now learn them.


"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

Your lack of understanding is explained below:

apparently you sorely lack critical thinking. Think about what she said, she suggests that people in the second basket have no opinion or no stance on the issues listed in the first basket. Well, typical bot mentality...no thinking.... either because of the lack of ability or purposefully overlooking logic in order to push the agenda. Which is it?

 

[Stratford57]

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

What's your point?

That you Leftists being pro-Islamic Apologists, think that everyone should put their heads in the sand and kiss Islamic buttocks and just go shopping or something because Islam isn't a threat to anyone.

Actually, Islam existed for ages and disturbed no one , but with a "help" from Washington became a real weapon of mass destruction (and let's not forget: not all Muslims are radicals and terrorists!) and thus opened a Pandora box.

In Russia Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists and many other religions have been coexisting together for ages . And Chechnian war was encouraged and sponsored from Washington too (Russia just got new evidence for that). A wise and strong leader like Putin is doing his best to make the people of different religions live next to each other and be good neighbors (city of Kazan and republic of Tatarstanis a great example of that!). Probably, that's another reason for Washington to hate Putin for,

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They do indeed. Now learn them.


"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

Your lack of understanding is explained below:

apparently you sorely lack critical thinking. Think about what she said, she suggests that people in the second basket have no opinion or no stance on the issues listed in the first basket. Well, typical bot mentality...no thinking.... either because of the lack of ability or purposefully overlooking logic in order to push the agenda. Which is it?

You're trying to make more of this than what it is. She was referring to those that openly display their deplorable positions of which there are many among Trump supporters.

 

[TooTall]

She was talking about the Alt Right lunatics. If you are part of them, yes you are deplorable.

What the hell is the Alt Right? Who runs it and who are its members?

Another stupid Trumpette.....

You just made that Alt Right crap up or you would not resort to name calling and answer the questions.

This is who she is talking about.

The Breitbart alt-right just took over the GOP

Are you part of the Alt Right?

I just now heard about the Alt Right so there is no way I could be part of them. I will check them out just for grins.

 

[defcon4]

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

Your lack of understanding is explained below:

apparently you sorely lack critical thinking. Think about what she said, she suggests that people in the second basket have no opinion or no stance on the issues listed in the first basket. Well, typical bot mentality...no thinking.... either because of the lack of ability or purposefully overlooking logic in order to push the agenda. Which is it?

You're trying to make more of this than what it is. She was referring to those that openly display their deplorable positions of which there are many among Trump supporters.

I am not trying to make more of anything. I pointed out that the categorization was based on false premises defying logic. Basically, it came down to demagoguery.

 

[OldLady]

No, momma. Her remarks included everybody who did not agree with her and had differing political views. I hope she will pay for it dearly.

Typical Comrade Trump supporter. Everyone knows she was talking about the Alt Right. If you are part of that, then you ARE deplorable.

Trying to spin it, ole Jim? Trying to do some damage control? Words mean things, at least that's how it used to be.

They do indeed. Now learn them.

Who will Hillary Clinton’s ‘basket of deplorables’ comment actually alienate?

"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Well done. Now if we can only get the media to run the WHOLE clip, instead of just the deplorables part.

Grannny, apparently you sorely lack critical thinking. Think about what she said, she suggests that people in the second basket have no opinion or no stance on the issues listed in the first basket. Well, typical bot mentality...no thinking.... either because of the lack of ability or purposefully overlooking logic in order to push the agenda. Which is it mama?

I'm not clever enough to figure out exactly what's wrong with your argument, but there's something not right there, Defcon. I saw nothing that inferred the rest of the Trump supporters were not thinking human beings. It's not there.

 

[MarathonMike]

Here is list of American Deplorables: Obama, Clinton, Kerry, Holder and Sharpton.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

Your lack of understanding is explained below:

apparently you sorely lack critical thinking. Think about what she said, she suggests that people in the second basket have no opinion or no stance on the issues listed in the first basket. Well, typical bot mentality...no thinking.... either because of the lack of ability or purposefully overlooking logic in order to push the agenda. Which is it?

You're trying to make more of this than what it is. She was referring to those that openly display their deplorable positions of which there are many among Trump supporters.

I am not trying to make more of anything. I pointed out that the categorization was based on false premises defying logic. Basically, it came down to demagoguery.

No the categorization was based on the actions and positions of a great many Trump supporters.
I think it's fair to call it demagoguery as that was kind of the whole point of pointing out the "deplorables" who support Trump.

 

[OldLady]

They do indeed. Now learn them.


"To just be grossly generalistic," Clinton said according to a transcript from BuzzFeed's Ruby Cramer, "you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

She talked a bit about how Trump has interacted with that racist element and then continued. "But the other basket — and I know this because I see friends from all over America here ... but that other basket are people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures — they're just desperate for change. ... Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

Well, yes, that could have been put better.

 

[Papageorgio]

Very nice, but with a little thinking you should realize that in reality you cannot slice the population according to her classification. So, if you are a Christian or Muslim and you disapprove homosexual lifestyle, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are a man and love women, you are immediately belong to the deplorables (Where is Slick on that one? He belongs to the deplorables then.) If you are against illegal immigration, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. If you are against Islamic terrorism, you are automatically belong to the deplorables. That leaves you with nobody in her second basket. Anyway... everybody who disagrees with any of the liberal agenda is deplorable. No matter how you slice or dice it. You, as a programmed bot, do not think about the inherent fallacy of her categorization. Thank you for your input, now you can sit down and shut up.

All of those positions or views Clinton stated are deplorable regardless of the reason for them. One day you may mature sufficiently to understand that.

Now, because you lack the capability of critical thinking or analyzing the actual text, it doesn't mean that you have to project your stupidity on others, does it?

It's a simple point. It requires no thought or analysis. An Islamophobe is an Islamophobe regardless of how they arrived at their Islammophobia.

Well, yes, that could have been put better.

I think she stated her position quite well, nothing inaccurate in her tweet.