Explanation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

[toastman]

Much earlier than Billo claimed I suppose. I don't know how the war of 47-49 might be non-violent from the Arab side.

If you want to go back that far, the genesis to all the violence in the area, started with the Zionist migration. Before that, there was no recorded major incidence of violence, between the two groups.

This is how ridiculous your logic is:

Before European Jews migrated to the region, there was no major violence between Jews and Arabs (which is false BTW), therefore European migration to the region is the cause of the violence.

The cause of the violence was Arabs massacring Jews on several occasions, way before Israel was even established.

The Shaw Commission observed:

• 
  "In less than 10 years three serious attacks have been made by Arabs on Jews. For 80 years before the first of these attacks there is no recorded instance of any similar incidents.

- See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

1834 looting of Safed - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1838 Druze attack on Safed - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1517 Hebron attacks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1834 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PF Tinmore documented it earlier linking a UN document. You posted Wiki Hasbara propaganda which the Hasbara team edits.

It's posts like this Monti that really expose you for the lying propagandist that you are. Think about what you just posted. Oh, and Tinmore uses Wiki all the time as well. However, what site was used has nothing to do with anything. Google the attacks that I posted, you will find multiple links about them.

 

[montelatici]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

 

[montelatici]

If you want to go back that far, the genesis to all the violence in the area, started with the Zionist migration. Before that, there was no recorded major incidence of violence, between the two groups.

This is how ridiculous your logic is:

Before European Jews migrated to the region, there was no major violence between Jews and Arabs (which is false BTW), therefore European migration to the region is the cause of the violence.

The cause of the violence was Arabs massacring Jews on several occasions, way before Israel was even established.

The Shaw Commission observed:

• 
  "In less than 10 years three serious attacks have been made by Arabs on Jews. For 80 years before the first of these attacks there is no recorded instance of any similar incidents.

- See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

1834 looting of Safed - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1838 Druze attack on Safed - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1517 Hebron attacks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1834 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PF Tinmore documented it earlier linking a UN document. You posted Wiki Hasbara propaganda which the Hasbara team edits.

What are you, stupid? I posted links to documented attacks. Are you saying they never happened?

I said that the violence was between native people and against settlers from outside Palestine.

 

[toastman]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

 

[toastman]

1834 looting of Safed - awesomely interesting facts images videos

1834 Hebron massacre

Translation of 1517 Hebron pogrom in English

You see Monti, you cannot handle the truth. It simply does not fit with your agenda

 

[montelatici]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

You posted links to Wiki that are not reliable when it comes to partisan issues as Hasbara edits them constantly to promote the Zionist agenda. The violence was between the locals and Jewish settlers from outside of Palestine. Safed had experienced an influx of Jews from Algeria, Morocco, Europe etc.

 

[toastman]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

You posted links to Wiki that are not reliable when it comes to partisan issues as Hasbara edits them constantly to promote the Zionist agenda. The violence was between the locals and Jewish settlers from outside of Palestine. Safed had experienced an influx of Jews from Algeria, Morocco, Europe etc.

I posted links to documented attacks. Wiki can be edited by ANYONE, not just pro Israelis, so your arguments is useless. Tinmore posted that there were no incidents of violence against Jews by Arabs prior to 1917. I refuted that, and your inability to handle facts got in the way and you clearly got pissed off. So you resorted to your usual "Wikipedia Habara ahhhhh!!" ur "
Instead, why don't you make an effort to refute my posts. Your Hasbara accusations don't work on me.

 

[toastman]

BTW, the Wiki articles have sources that are linked at the bottom. For example:

One a Day An Anthology of Jewish Historical Anniversaries for Every Day of ... - Abraham P. Bloch - Google Books

 

[P F Tinmore]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

No they didn't.

 

[toastman]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

No they didn't.

Oh really? How do you figure?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

No they didn't.

Oh really? How do you figure?

Nothing happened back 80 years as I posted.

 

[toastman]

Tilmore posted a link to a UN document in this case. I don't use wiki as you well know. I did google the items. All Hasbara propaganda. Not one neutral site confirms the bullshit you link to.

You are such an idiot who really cannot handle the truth. What does it matter if Tinmore posted a UN document? I posted links to documented attacks that refute his post.
Are you telling me these attacks never happened?

No they didn't.

Oh really? How do you figure?

Nothing happened back 80 years as I posted.

I posted several links to attacks that did happen. You have not refuted them.
How can you be so stupid to post " No they didn't happen"

 

[montelatici]

There was conflict between both the settlers and the native people. If the settlers had not been there, there would not have been conflict.

 

[Humanity]

"Whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel," he told the Israeli news site NRG.

Asked if that meant a state would not be established if he remained prime minister, he said: "Indeed."

Netanyahu says no Palestinian state as long as he s prime minister Reuters

No that is just the editors headlines he actually said

"Whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel,"

And you have the audacity to accuse others of cherry picking!?!?

You missed the line from the article which states...

Asked if that meant a state would not be established if he remained prime minister, he said: "Indeed."

NOPE no cherry picking at all as that was a summation of his reply earlier.

Think you might find that it was an answer to to direct question

Then you will be able to produce the transcript or video of the questioning ?

Already been done on a different thread idiot!

So, how about you go watch the video and then come back and tell me what he says!

 

[Billo_Really]

What are you, stupid? I posted links to documented attacks. Are you saying they never happened?

You posted links prior to the Zionist migration. The most recent being 1834. So, almost 100 years went by with no major outbreaks of violence.

That all changed when Zionists showed up with their racist, apartheid policies.

 

[Phoenall]

Much earlier than Billo claimed I suppose. I don't know how the war of 47-49 might be non-violent from the Arab side.

If you want to go back that far, the genesis to all the violence in the area, started with the Zionist migration. Before that, there was no recorded major incidence of violence, between the two groups.

Once again you ignore the history of islam and what it did in the 7C to the Jews in the M.E. That is when the problems started with the mass murders and rapes of the Jews. Because they would not convert to islam and swell his ranks and coffers he issued a command from allah to KILL ALL THE UNBELIEVERS. From that day on there have been thousands of recorded incidents of muslims attacking the Jews.

 

[Phoenall]

There was very little violence between the Arab Jews, Arab Christians and the Arab Muslims of Palestine before the Europeans began migrating in the mid 1850s. Any violence was between Palestinian Arabs and Europeans, not Arab Jews unless they allied themselves with the Europeans.

BULLSHIT the Koran tells of attacks on the Jews in the 7C and the command from allah to KILL THE UNBELIEVERS. This includes the Christians.

 

[Phoenall]

Much earlier than Billo claimed I suppose. I don't know how the war of 47-49 might be non-violent from the Arab side.

If you want to go back that far, the genesis to all the violence in the area, started with the Zionist migration. Before that, there was no recorded major incidence of violence, between the two groups.

This is how ridiculous your logic is:

Before European Jews migrated to the region, there was no major violence between Jews and Arabs (which is false BTW), therefore European migration to the region is the cause of the violence.

The cause of the violence was Arabs massacring Jews on several occasions, way before Israel was even established.

The Shaw Commission observed:

• 
  "In less than 10 years three serious attacks have been made by Arabs on Jews. For 80 years before the first of these attacks there is no recorded instance of any similar incidents.

- See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

Islamonazi propaganda group so not a valid source.

 

[Phoenall]

Much earlier than Billo claimed I suppose. I don't know how the war of 47-49 might be non-violent from the Arab side.

If you want to go back that far, the genesis to all the violence in the area, started with the Zionist migration. Before that, there was no recorded major incidence of violence, between the two groups.

This is how ridiculous your logic is:

Before European Jews migrated to the region, there was no major violence between Jews and Arabs (which is false BTW), therefore European migration to the region is the cause of the violence.

The cause of the violence was Arabs massacring Jews on several occasions, way before Israel was even established.

The Shaw Commission observed:

• 
  "In less than 10 years three serious attacks have been made by Arabs on Jews. For 80 years before the first of these attacks there is no recorded instance of any similar incidents.

- See more at: The Origins and Evolution of the Palestine Problem - CEIRPP DPR study part I 1917-1947 30 June 1978

1834 looting of Safed - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1838 Druze attack on Safed - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1517 Hebron attacks - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

1834 Hebron massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PF Tinmore documented it earlier linking a UN document. You posted Wiki Hasbara propaganda which the Hasbara team edits.

From a islamonazi source, which you have been told about before so not valid or believable.

 

[Phoenall]

No that is just the editors headlines he actually said

"Whoever moves to establish a Palestinian state or intends to withdraw from territory is simply yielding territory for radical Islamic terrorist attacks against Israel,"

And you have the audacity to accuse others of cherry picking!?!?

You missed the line from the article which states...

Asked if that meant a state would not be established if he remained prime minister, he said: "Indeed."

NOPE no cherry picking at all as that was a summation of his reply earlier.

Think you might find that it was an answer to to direct question

Then you will be able to produce the transcript or video of the questioning ?

Already been done on a different thread idiot!

So, how about you go watch the video and then come back and tell me what he says!

NO a newspaper article is not first hand evidence, it is fiction.