JoeB131
Diamond Member
I can imagine the steam coming from your ears as you read it.I have read her book. She is a sanctimonious virtuous signalers who is paid by companies to tell their white employees how racist they are.
Makes me want to read it even more.
Actually, I accurately label people what they are. Oh, you all try to dress it up in nice clothes, saying you are for "religious freedom" or against "quota", but it's all the same crap.But you incorrectly label people with differing opinions as racist or homophobic, which is intellectually dishonest. You resort to those tactics, long before others do. What rules in Zone 1. Rarely do they appear to be monitored or corrected. And what did I say is wrong or attacking.
Well, besides being racist, you called her my wife, which is an attack on family and against the rules. For the record, she's been here six years and we've been toghether for a little over a year.You already said you're fiance is from China. Is it against the rule to assume you're taking the 90 day fiance route?
I did try getting one of those mail order brides once, but they forgot to punch the holes in the box and I had quite the mess on my hands. (That's actually a joke, since you seem to also be humor deprived.)
And pot meet kettle, you're the one constantly jabbing at others whom you refuse to engage reasonably and reducing them to phobics and racists.
Because at the end of the day, that's all you guys kind of have. Now, I'll will challenge a IM2 or a PaulEssen when I think they are getting a little too crazy on the other side.
No, I didn't read the book. But at face value, she said to remove themselves from Whites.
Scott Adams in assessing a poll where a large % agreed that it's wrong to be white, said for whites to stay away from blacks because a large portion of blacks don't like whites. What Adam's proposed is a logical assessment. You accommodate context for one, while dismiss the other.
Uh, no, it's really not. Besides taking a Rasmussen poll seriously, and not understanding the question, I fully admit, there probably a lot of black people who just don't like white folks. And I can kind of understand it, if I had to grow up black in this country, I doubt I'd like white folks, either.
You mean it was a Rasmussen poll.Granted, the poll itself is dishonest to a degree and intentionally or unintentionally is creating division.
Except not really.Granted, the poll itself is dishonest to a degree and intentionally or unintentionally is creating division.
However: <50% of blacks responded that they couldn't agree to some degree that it's not okay to be white.
Scott Adams probably did take his response to an illogical outcome, and I'm not sure I would say the those that didn't "Strongly agree' are a hate group.
But Robin stating that Black's need to separate to help remove their fears from Whites is, at the core, no different.
Robin was recognizing that black folks have to constantly self-edit to simply function among white people.
And that for their own sanity, they need to take breaks from that.
That's quite different from what Adams said.