Evidence of Collusion

[Spare_change]

“We don’t yet have hard evidence,” says House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) about the Russian collusion allegations. CNN’s Chris Cuomo, who was asking about what does it mean that there’s no hard evidence regarding Russian collusion, was interviewing the Maryland Democrat.

Hoyer also said “It’s the pattern that leads one to believe that there’s fire where there is so much smoke.” Yet, there’s no evidence. Every single “scoop” about possible Russian collusion, or acts of wrongdoing, always have buried in the story that there’s either no evidence or there’s nothing conclusive. Yes, we know about meetings or interactions Trump officials had with the Russians, but even former CIA Director John Brennan said this week that does not necessarily mean that’s evidence of collusion. Asked directly about such evidence, Brennan said he doesn’t know. Did Russia try to interfere? Probably, but they did not hack this election, which is another misconception peddled by the political Left. The Russians did not hack and mess with vote tallies on Election Night.

Also, Hoyer isn’t the only Democrats saying there is no evidence. His colleague Rep. Joe Crowley (D-NY) said that there’s no evidence. Sen. Dianne Feinstein said (twice) that there’s no evidence. Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee are resigned that they may not find evidence of collusion. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said that there was no definitive proof.

Top House Democrat: We Have No Hard Evidence Of Russian Collusion

 

[TheDude]

That's the problem. The libs are trying to fabricate something to take the pain out of the severe butt hurt experienced in November. Sure they can find instances contributing to their illusion (frog legs taste like chicken, so they may be relatives). At the end of the day, you cannot connect the dots for an intangible fabrication.

 

[OKTexas]

They'll never let it go, even when they're proven wrong, just like Gore v. Bush.

.

 

[theHawk]

Libs just keep repeating "collusion" over and over, so they have to believe it. Even though "collusion" isn't a crime. Any kind of conspiracy charge has to be linked to an actual crime, like hacking. That would mean the Feds would have to prove what individuals hacked the DNC emails, and prove that Trump conspired in that crime.

It's utterly ridiculous and a waste of taxpayer money. No crime was ever committed in the first place to warrant an investigation, it's just a political witch hunt.

 

[AlexanderPK]

I’m not from around here, the USA I mean, and I’m wondering if that collusion thing really bothers your average American Joe? The fake news is turning a blind eye to the real threat that’s already there at your doorsteps, the islamic extremism, and all that according to that stupid liberal media should worry American people are Russians. Look at the Europe reaping what it sowed. Aren’t you afraid you going to be next? Fight real problems, stop chasing phantoms.