Eventually they will have to vote for a party that has better economic policy.
Perhaps they feel they are.
"Cut, cut, cut, cut, cut, cut" isn't necessarily an attractive message to all voters, regardless of their skin color.
The GOP might want to consider a more comprehensive message than that.
The problem is "spend spend spend spend" is only an attractive message to people who don't realize that it means "pay pay pay pay" sometime down the road.
Could be, but whichever is the case, the GOP needs to decide if it's going to improve its message/messaging to minorities or not. If not, they can't be surprised if they're not happy with the electoral results in 5, 10, 20, 30 years.
The messaging doesn't matter because its how the MSM frames whatever Republicans say, and until more minorities get their information from non-traditional sources, the Narrative will hold sway regardless of how Republicans package their message.
Sending them to non-traditional sources means they'd just be more subjected to the boilerplate "Socialism! Marxism! Communism! Kenya! Birth certificate! Radical! Extreme! No government! Cut this! Cut that!" stuff that they are already turned off to.
Republicans are interviewed by the media,
they're on live television that can't be edited, they have a chance to say smart, reasonable things, yet they still go off the rails. Then all the Democrats have to do is point at it and say, "holy crap, look at that!", and minorities say "yep".
I sure could be wrong, but I'm paying attention, and that's the image right now.
.