Eric Holder sues PA for insisting female cops meet same standards as male cops!!!

[ShootSpeeders]

Typical lib idiocy. They insist women are equal to men but still need to be held to a lower standard.!

Eric Holder Sues Police Dept. for Treating Women as Equals - Michael Schaus - Townhall Finance Conservative Columnists and Financial Commentary - Page full

Jul 31, 2014

The Pennsylvania State Police are being sued by Eric “The Extortionist” Holder for alleged sexual discrimination. The offense: Women are being held to the same standards as their male counterparts!

So what is this horribly sexist barrier to female employment really look like? Well, there are five components of the physical test. A 300 meter run, sit-ups, push-ups, a 1.5 mile run, and a vertical jump. Roughly 94 percent of male candidates passed. Only about 70 percent of women passed

Aside from Holder’s decision to sue based on the absurdly racist/sexist notion of disparate impact (hang on to your hats – if your gender makes such hanging possible – because we’ll address that in a minute), he has also decided to sue over the police department’s failure to compensate women who fail said physical test. Yeah, that’s right: The DOJ expects Pennsylvania’s state police to pay women who fail the test.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

If disparate impact is wrong then shouldn't all affirmative action programs be dropped ?. They are DESIGNED to discriminate against white men.

Eric Hitler is more hateful than even obama.

 

[dilloduck]

If disparate impact is wrong then shouldn't all affirmative action programs be dropped ?. They are DESIGNED to discriminate against white men.

Eric Hitler is more hateful than even obama.

He's gotta make the GOP "war on women" look like it's real.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

He's gotta make the GOP "war on women" look like it's real.

The stupid GOP needs to scream that affirmative action means the war is on MEN. Women (like blacks) get nothing but special treatment in crazy america.

 

[Moonglow]

Women are not physically equal with men, that is a given, so therefore you can't make them pass the same test as a man that would be putting them at a disadvantage..
The author of the story also seems to have a problem with passing on the ideas without writing in an overly sarcastic manner which would make the story seem overly one sided.

 

[Circle_Breaker]

Women are not physically equal with men, that is a given, so therefore you can't make them pass the same test as a man that would be putting them at a disadvantage..
The author of the story also seems to have a problem with passing on the ideas without writing in an overly sarcastic manner which would make the story seem overly one sided.

They still need to meet the basic requirements for the Job. If 70% of women are meeting the requirements then its obvious that women are physically able to complete the tests and should be held to the same standards.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Women are not physically equal with men, that is a given, so therefore you can't make them pass the same test as a man that would be putting them at a disadvantage..
The author of the story also seems to have a problem with passing on the ideas without writing in an overly sarcastic manner which would make the story seem overly one sided.

Women are physically inferior? That's true but holder won't say that. Anyway - if some women can't meet the standards, they shouldn't get the job. Otherwise what's the point of having standards.

BTW - i agree the article is poorly written. Author has too much of a smart-ass attitude.

 

[dilloduck]

<crickets>

 

[Jarlaxle]

Women are not physically equal with men, that is a given, so therefore you can't make them pass the same test as a man that would be putting them at a disadvantage..
The author of the story also seems to have a problem with passing on the ideas without writing in an overly sarcastic manner which would make the story seem overly one sided.

If they are doing the same job, they should meet the same standards. Period, end of story.

 

[Godboy]

Women are not physically equal with men, that is a given, so therefore you can't make them pass the same test as a man that would be putting them at a disadvantage..
The author of the story also seems to have a problem with passing on the ideas without writing in an overly sarcastic manner which would make the story seem overly one sided.

What is the point of physical standards if youre just going to lower them until EVERYONE can pass? Why do you suppose there is a physical requirement to begin with? If you can correctly answer that question, you will then know why you shouldnt be lowering the standards. This isnt rocket science.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Liberals insist standards be "normed" ie female standards must be lowered until equal numbers of females meet their standards as men meet their standards. That's what passes for equality in america today.