Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,906
- 90,779
- 3,635
^^^ word salad.I'll give you a little time in the derailment direction that you are pushing for, since you finally admitted the Clapton's injury is likely the result of a side effect from the jab. I am confident that I have been referring to Clapton's injury as something that "resulted" as a side effect from the jab, and that I have not called the injury itself the side effect. Seems like pretty much the same thing, but you know how carefully I word my posts...YOU referred to the side effect of the vaccine Clapton experienced as an "injury"...
Do you think that differentiating calling the injury itself the side effect from saying that the injury likely "resulted from the side effect" makes any difference in the point that was made in the article about how censorship and deplatforming come into play when side effects of the jab are discussed? Or how it takes 208 posts for the first lefty to admit that Clapton's injury likely resulted from a side effect of the jab?
You referred to his side effect as an "injury" and then denied referring to it as an "injury." You suffer from some sort of brain ailment.
And still, no answer from you.... so what?