Epstein = Pizzagate

georgephillip brought it up, making the false claim that Trump's ability to fight it, was the inital appeal in building his base.

I was responding to his false claim. When you jumped in.
Kevin-Siers-cartoon-on-Trump-Draining-the-Swamp-768x571.jpg

Deep State?
 
So why aren’t they naming who victimized them?
Possibly because Epstein's protectors like Alan Dershowitz are making it clear any victims who provide the names of their abusers will face lawsuits.

GoogleAI Overview:

"In a 1997 Los Angeles Times op-ed titled 'Statutory Rape is an Outdated Concept,' attorney and former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz argued that the age of consent should be lowered to 14 or 15."
 
Possibly because Epstein's protectors like Alan Dershowitz are making it clear any victims who provide the names of their abusers will face lawsuits.

GoogleAI Overview:

"In a 1997 Los Angeles Times op-ed titled 'Statutory Rape is an Outdated Concept,' attorney and former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz argued that the age of consent should be lowered to 14 or 15."
Dershowitz has been named by victims as one of the perps so…
 
Possibly because Epstein's protectors like Alan Dershowitz are making it clear any victims who provide the names of their abusers will face lawsuits.

GoogleAI Overview:

"In a 1997 Los Angeles Times op-ed titled 'Statutory Rape is an Outdated Concept,' attorney and former Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz argued that the age of consent should be lowered to 14 or 15."
You’re telling me they won’t name names because a Jew lawyer wrote an op-ed for the LA Times back in 1997?

Ridiculous.
 
Hardly. If you've bothered to listen to Dershowitz on this subject, he seldom fails to threaten Epstein's victims with a lawsuit if they dare mention any names of their abusers.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/08/us/alan-dershowitz-virginia-giuffre-allegations-dropped
She is the one that retracted it. She said she was mistaken in naming him. Sounds like she was trying to extort money out of him.

She provided no evidence or details of a Dershowitz attack.

So again, why would that stop any of the current victims from naming names?
 
Dershowitz has been named by victims as one of the perps so…

CNN

A woman who was a victim of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has agreed to drop allegations against attorney Alan Dershowitz saying she “may have made a mistake” when she also accused him of sexual abuse.

The accuser, Virginia Giuffre, said in a statement that she was young at the time she was trafficked by Epstein and in a “very stressful and traumatic environment.” Giuffre had alleged that Epstein had trafficked her to Dershowitz between 2000 and 2002, but Dershowitz long denied her claim.
 
She is the one that retracted it. She said she was mistaken in naming him. Sounds like she was trying to extort money out of him.

She provided no evidence or details of a Dershowitz attack.

So again, why would that stop any of the current victims from naming names?
She retracted because she could not afford to defend herself against Dershowitz; it's called lawfare.

Current victims are facing the same strategy which is why they require the government to release the names of their abusers.

 

Epstein Files Reveal Prosecutors’ Announcement Dated Before His Death​



Epstein Death Statement Was Drafted A Day Before He Died, Files Show​

A statement of Jeffrey Epstein's death was dated August 9, 2019, a day before the convicted sex offender was found dead in his jail cell.
He ain't even dead.
 
Trump doesn't hire women for important positions.
Liar.

Nobody ever loved Trump.
Liar.

He's always been a bully, and asshole,




Just a few of the stories I was able to remember and easily still look up. Tell me Liar, have you ever heard of a single democrat donating and giving selflessly to help another without some political ligature connected to it? Most of these events were barely covered in the news and gave Trump no political gain. Obumma would not even lift a finger for the marine trapped in Mexico for a year, would not even make a phone call to bring him home, meanwhile, they bust a nut tring to give violent criminals sanctuary. Democrats are worse than dirt.

Repeating the lie about Biden showering with his daughter
Liar. His daughter has since both confirmed and admitted the story. Biden is a pedo. Most democrats in DC, LA and NYC are.
 
Liar.


Liar.






Just a few of the stories I was able to remember and easily still look up. Tell me Liar, have you ever heard of a single democrat donating and giving selflessly to help another without some political ligature connected to it? Most of these events were barely covered in the news and gave Trump no political gain. Obumma would not even lift a finger for the marine trapped in Mexico for a year, would not even make a phone call to bring him home, meanwhile, they bust a nut tring to give violent criminals sanctuary. Democrats are worse than dirt.


Liar. His daughter has since both confirmed and admitted the story. Biden is a pedo. Most democrats in DC, LA and NYC are.
Let’s see. Trump rebuilt Wollman Rink on his own dime. So his claim of getting it done under budget is horse shit.

There was no budget


And then you end with the Biden lie His daughter did no such thing. In fact t she said the diary entry that this nonsense is based on was misinterpreted
 
15th post
Why would you find the credibility of a racist con man superior to Epstein's?

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf

"Epstein spoke at length about Trump with the author Michael Wolff in August 2017, two years before being found dead in his jail cell.

"Wolff was researching his bombshell bestseller Fire and Fury at the time.

"The recordings cast more light on Trump’s long relationship with Epstein, and will add to debate over the character of the Republican candidate, especially his attitudes and conduct toward women, just days before the election.

"The tapes tell Epstein’s version of the relationship between two former friends and their very different paths: One toward infamy, prison and suicide; the other toward power, the Oval Office and his own criminal conviction for paying hush money to a porn star."

So, to avoid the fact that the source, EPSTEIN is not credible, you cite a SECOND HAND REPORT from the same source?

You lefties, can't really THINK anymore, can you.

Note the failure to use a question mark at the end of that question. That was not a failure. That was intentional.


So, far, the MONEY SHOT, against TRUMP, has been that he was in a plane at the same time as a twenty year old woman.


THAT'S all you've got so far. And really, there is no reason to believe that anything more will be found.
 
Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

"In April 2016, an anonymous woman using the pseudonym 'Katie Johnson' filed a lawsuit in California accusing both Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of forcibly raping her when she was 13 years old at underage sex parties at Epstein's Manhattan residence in 1994.

"The case was dismissed the following month."

If such an incident actually occurred thirty years ago, Epstein would likely have recorded the crime for future blackmail purposes.

How likely is it Trump's DoJ will release such evidence?
So, since an allegation was made, you are assuming that it really happened...

Fasinating.

You lefties, you don't really THINK anymore, do you.
 
You mentioned Hunter Biden's name as an example of deep state actions.

I mentioned the cover up by the fbi and cia as an example of the deep state in action.

I did not use his name as some sort of magic word, that was to stop thinking or discussion.

I cited actions by large institutions within the government, that we all saw in real time.

Your attempt to lie about what I did, to reframe the discussion to be about something else, that is the type of dishonest and evasive debating tactics that the left has been increasingly good at, as their policies have failed more and more as they have been causing more and more harm to people and society.


If you were a good faith person you could have tried to challenge my example, perhaps by defending the actions of the fbi and the cia in that coverup, during the 2020 election.

That would be pretty much impossible though. So then you are left with admitting that I am right.

Which you are not capable of doing. Since you are not an honest person.


So you talked shit.
 
How is your conception of the "deep state" different from "MAGA commissars"?

Trump Is Creating a Deep State | Opinion
.....

My "conception" or understanding of the Deep State is vague and ill defined, as one would reasonable expect from a secretive and illegal institution.

Thus, asking how it is "different" from another group of people's perception of the same institution, when my view on the institution is vague and neither of us can read the mind of the other group,

would be very difficult and I don't see any value to it...

Oh, you're trying to muddy the waters,... wait, not that's not it.

You are trying to create the illusion that my view of the deep state is just me parroting something my "THOUGHT LEADERS" told me to think.

Even though I have already explained in detail my personal thoughts that led me to conclude that the DEEP STATE is a real thing.

You're quite an asshole. Go **** yourself.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom