Epstein files - those who say bad things about Trump are "not credible" and anything they say is "unfounded and false"

frigidweirdo

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
55,073
Reaction score
15,222
Points
2,180

"One document contains a series of uncorroborated tips about Mr Trump collated by the FBI in August last year, including claims that a 13- or 14-year-old girl was forced to perform oral sex on the president decades ago."

"According to the complaint, the girl claimed she bit Mr Trump while performing the sex act, and was “allegedly hit in the face after she laughed” about it."

So, someone has come out and said that Trump got given a blow job by a 13 or 14 year old.

Trump is just saying everything is untrue, obviously.

"One individual who was spoken to was “deemed not credible”."

"The White House warned the Epstein files “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos” because the administration had turned over “everything that was sent to the FBI by the public”."

"In a statement published in tandem with the Epstein files on Friday, the DoJ warned: “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election."

"“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already.”"

Then the files disappeared.

"Sexual assault allegations against Donald Trump disappeared from the Epstein files within hours of them being published."

"Todd Blanche, the deputy US attorney general, admitted that the team tasked with reviewing the documents would inevitably have made mistakes and would “immediately correct any redaction errors”."

So, they're going to correct "errors"... which basically seems to imply here that anything that might hurt Trump is an "error".

"Other allegations include graphic details of so called “orgy parties” that the president is accused by an unknown person of taking part in."

The FBI actually made a list of things connected to the President.

"It is unclear when the allegation was made or why, months after Mr Trump returned to office, the FBI decided to compile a list of claims made against the president in connection with Epstein."

And to sum it up "They all deny wrongdoing."
 

"One document contains a series of uncorroborated tips about Mr Trump collated by the FBI in August last year, including claims that a 13- or 14-year-old girl was forced to perform oral sex on the president decades ago."

"According to the complaint, the girl claimed she bit Mr Trump while performing the sex act, and was “allegedly hit in the face after she laughed” about it."

So, someone has come out and said that Trump got given a blow job by a 13 or 14 year old.

Trump is just saying everything is untrue, obviously.

"One individual who was spoken to was “deemed not credible”."

"The White House warned the Epstein files “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos” because the administration had turned over “everything that was sent to the FBI by the public”."

"In a statement published in tandem with the Epstein files on Friday, the DoJ warned: “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election."

"“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already.”"

Then the files disappeared.

"Sexual assault allegations against Donald Trump disappeared from the Epstein files within hours of them being published."

"Todd Blanche, the deputy US attorney general, admitted that the team tasked with reviewing the documents would inevitably have made mistakes and would “immediately correct any redaction errors”."

So, they're going to correct "errors"... which basically seems to imply here that anything that might hurt Trump is an "error".

"Other allegations include graphic details of so called “orgy parties” that the president is accused by an unknown person of taking part in."

The FBI actually made a list of things connected to the President.

"It is unclear when the allegation was made or why, months after Mr Trump returned to office, the FBI decided to compile a list of claims made against the president in connection with Epstein."

And to sum it up "They all deny wrongdoing."
None of the details in these documents can just be taken at face value, sorry. Whether Gates, Trump or any other soul enlisted within the content of said documents.

We must engage in the open deliberation of what is a fallacy and what might be more probable on a reliable scale of possibility.

So, Trump being who he is, an easy mark and well known, do you not think that SOMEONE at SOME point would have had him in a courtroom? None of the victims named him and if someone does now, decades later, my initial compulsion would be to vigorously question the veracity of the claims. If you recall there was ample skepticism of the Blasey Ford claims against Kavanaugh and it turned out that she lied. She admitted she made up some of the story.

She profited handsomely while skewering a mans reputation in front of his family and the world. We cannot just allow this to continue based on some details within literally millions of dossier information.

I thus will view all such allegations critically, even against those more likely to be creeps; until there is some tenacious exploration into the foundation of the information.
 
Last edited:
None of the details in these documents can just be taken at face value, sorry. Whether Gates, Trump or any other soul enlisted within the content of said documents.

We must engage in the open deliberation of what is a fallacy and what might be more probable on a reliable scale of possibility.

So, Trump being who he is, an easy mark and well known, do you not think that SOMEONE at SOME point would have had him in a courtroom? None of the victims named him and if someone does now, decades later, my initial compulsion would be to vigorously question the veracity of the claims. If you recall there was ample skepticism of the Blasey Ford claims against Kavanaugh and it turned out that she lied. She admitted she made up some of the story.

She profited handsomely while skewering a mans reputation in front of his family and the world. We cannot just allow this to continue based on some details within literally millions of dossier information.

I thus will view all such allegations, even against those more likely to be creeps; until there is some tenacious exploration into the foundation of the information.
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
 

"One document contains a series of uncorroborated tips about Mr Trump collated by the FBI in August last year, including claims that a 13- or 14-year-old girl was forced to perform oral sex on the president decades ago."

"According to the complaint, the girl claimed she bit Mr Trump while performing the sex act, and was “allegedly hit in the face after she laughed” about it."

So, someone has come out and said that Trump got given a blow job by a 13 or 14 year old.

Trump is just saying everything is untrue, obviously.

"One individual who was spoken to was “deemed not credible”."

"The White House warned the Epstein files “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos” because the administration had turned over “everything that was sent to the FBI by the public”."

"In a statement published in tandem with the Epstein files on Friday, the DoJ warned: “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election."

"“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already.”"

Then the files disappeared.

"Sexual assault allegations against Donald Trump disappeared from the Epstein files within hours of them being published."

"Todd Blanche, the deputy US attorney general, admitted that the team tasked with reviewing the documents would inevitably have made mistakes and would “immediately correct any redaction errors”."

So, they're going to correct "errors"... which basically seems to imply here that anything that might hurt Trump is an "error".

"Other allegations include graphic details of so called “orgy parties” that the president is accused by an unknown person of taking part in."

The FBI actually made a list of things connected to the President.

"It is unclear when the allegation was made or why, months after Mr Trump returned to office, the FBI decided to compile a list of claims made against the president in connection with Epstein."

And to sum it up "They all deny wrongdoing."
In other words there was never anything to implicate Trump, and you’re butt hurt over it.
 
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
Yea sure. Biden just decided to not leak that or make it public or charge Trump.

He must be secretly MAGA.
 
There are probably stories bought by DEM politicians to smear many on their hit list? Using GOVT funds back to Obiden 1.0 when they turned on the firehouse at $1.6T per year. Back then, $1.6-$2T was a massive amount. Debt was barely $9.5T Jan 09'.
 

"One document contains a series of uncorroborated tips about Mr Trump collated by the FBI in August last year, including claims that a 13- or 14-year-old girl was forced to perform oral sex on the president decades ago."

"According to the complaint, the girl claimed she bit Mr Trump while performing the sex act, and was “allegedly hit in the face after she laughed” about it."

So, someone has come out and said that Trump got given a blow job by a 13 or 14 year old.

Trump is just saying everything is untrue, obviously.

"One individual who was spoken to was “deemed not credible”."

"The White House warned the Epstein files “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos” because the administration had turned over “everything that was sent to the FBI by the public”."

"In a statement published in tandem with the Epstein files on Friday, the DoJ warned: “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election."

"“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already.”"

Then the files disappeared.

"Sexual assault allegations against Donald Trump disappeared from the Epstein files within hours of them being published."

"Todd Blanche, the deputy US attorney general, admitted that the team tasked with reviewing the documents would inevitably have made mistakes and would “immediately correct any redaction errors”."

So, they're going to correct "errors"... which basically seems to imply here that anything that might hurt Trump is an "error".

"Other allegations include graphic details of so called “orgy parties” that the president is accused by an unknown person of taking part in."

The FBI actually made a list of things connected to the President.

"It is unclear when the allegation was made or why, months after Mr Trump returned to office, the FBI decided to compile a list of claims made against the president in connection with Epstein."

And to sum it up "They all deny wrongdoing."
Missing from your TDS attempt to vilify Trump, are Bill and Hilarity Clinton, Bill Gates, former Prince Andrew, Woody Allen and more. Hmmm. Why is it your desire to prosecute stops at Trump? If Trump is guilty, and hearsay from somebody's friend won't prove that, Hang Trump out to dry--however don't give the rest of the pedophiles a free ride because 'they're not Trump.' Your distaste is disingenuous.
 
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
What a sick thing to say.

If you were a man of character you would apologize to me for that evil and demonstrably untrue statement.
 
Last edited:

"One document contains a series of uncorroborated tips about Mr Trump collated by the FBI in August last year, including claims that a 13- or 14-year-old girl was forced to perform oral sex on the president decades ago."

"According to the complaint, the girl claimed she bit Mr Trump while performing the sex act, and was “allegedly hit in the face after she laughed” about it."

So, someone has come out and said that Trump got given a blow job by a 13 or 14 year old.

Trump is just saying everything is untrue, obviously.

"One individual who was spoken to was “deemed not credible”."

"The White House warned the Epstein files “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos” because the administration had turned over “everything that was sent to the FBI by the public”."

"In a statement published in tandem with the Epstein files on Friday, the DoJ warned: “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election."

"“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already.”"

Then the files disappeared.

"Sexual assault allegations against Donald Trump disappeared from the Epstein files within hours of them being published."

"Todd Blanche, the deputy US attorney general, admitted that the team tasked with reviewing the documents would inevitably have made mistakes and would “immediately correct any redaction errors”."

So, they're going to correct "errors"... which basically seems to imply here that anything that might hurt Trump is an "error".

"Other allegations include graphic details of so called “orgy parties” that the president is accused by an unknown person of taking part in."

The FBI actually made a list of things connected to the President.

"It is unclear when the allegation was made or why, months after Mr Trump returned to office, the FBI decided to compile a list of claims made against the president in connection with Epstein."

And to sum it up "They all deny wrongdoing."
Wow!

Forcing a 14 year old to give him oral, and then slapping her around when she laughs (as would any 14 year old girl forced to fellate a much older man). That's an amazing story!

That's better than the one about getting peed on by the Ruskie prostie! In fact this is maybe the best uncorraborated double-hearsay allegation yet!

And it disappeared?

Gosh, Fridgie . . . I'm sorry.

How angry does that make you? It's gotta be pretty infuriating.

How can we help?
 
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
Good, good. Let your anger out. That's how we can help.

Pretend I'm Donald Trump. What would you say to me if you could?
 
15th post
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
They buried it. Just like the Russian connection, Trump-Hitler DNA and flat earth.
 
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
And what do you say to the files of Epstein himself exonerated Trump of any wrong doing when he said Trump never got so much as a massage at any Epstein related event. I get it--it goes counter to your TDS and that just chaps your hide.
 
And that's the problem, isn't it? What files that might have provided the proof have probably disappeared for good. That's what happens when a pedo protector gets put in charge. All his friends get as much protection as he can give them.

And you love it. You love pedos being protected.
You love hurling fake claims.
 
What a sick thing to say.

If you were a man of character you would apologize to me for that evil and demonstrably untrue statement.
Is Trump protecting pedophiles?

Yes, and we know this.


"Former President Donald Trump once described late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as a "terrific guy" who liked women "on the younger side.""

Trump officially banned Epstein from Mar al Lago. Unofficially Epstein claimed he was still going to Mar al Lago.

A father found out what was happening to his daughter there, kicked up a fuss, so Trump "banned him". Why would Trump officially ban him? Because Epstein was up to no good.

And Trump did NOTHING about it.

Then Trump said in his campaign that he'd release the Epstein files. Then set out and did not.
He was told to release them on the 19th December. He released something like 1% of them.
The lies have been coming and coming and coming.

Kash Patel, a liar as bad as Trump, who got found out and is still in his job saying "In September 2025, Kash Patel, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that the bureau's files contained 'no credible information' suggesting that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to anyone other than himself."


And yet the Epstein files suggest otherwise. So, either he testified without knowing what he was talking about, or knew and lied. The latter is most likely because...

"However, newly released materials from the Department of Justice contain internal email chains from July 2019 explicitly referring to 'the 10 co-conspirators,' "

Yep, the DOJ literally knew that this was false.

Why would Patel lie? Because Trump told him to.

Trump has been so dishonest about the Epstein files, it's ludicrious.

Trump has been protecting those pedophile (oh, they're not actually pedophiles, but nobody knows the real word is Ephebophilia, so really Trump is an Ephebophile Protecter... but then Trump flipped the bird and told some dude to "**** off" when he called Trump a pedo protector, so it's out there and we'll use that.

Trump is that. He's been protecting people. Powerful people who have done some bad shit, and illegal shit and they all got given secret deals.... because there's one rule for them and one rule for everyone else.

Now we come to you.


Instead of talking about Trump, we should talk about Obama and Clinton.

"What about an impeachment over Obama or Biden? How about impeachment of various leaders of the House or Senate over the years?"


"I've said it before, Trump may not be a choir boy, few billionaires are; but he is not a diddler."

Yeah, well the Epstein files suggest something else. At best he's a protector of diddlers, at worst he's been doing all kinds of things.

Essentially you've defended Trump in just about every post you've had a chance to defend him over this.

So, what I said stands. Don't like it, call the police.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom