Epstein files - evidence Trump may be lying, and why are these documents being redacted?

frigidweirdo

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Messages
55,078
Reaction score
15,231
Points
2,180

1773996773865.webp


Here's the redacted file that was released at some point. Age Verification | United States Department of Justice
Here's the link.

What was discussed was redacted. Perhaps they thought this was attorney client privilege or some nonsense.

1773996904130.webp


Here's a barely readable copy of what the unredacted file says.

Asked whether Epstein was expelled from Mar al Lago: "No, he was not a member. May have been a guest. Never asked to leave."

Well, Trump said that Epstein was expelled.


"Last week, the White House said Trump kicked Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club "for being a creep".

The last part someone confirms that Epstein was never asked to leave.

Pressed on whether there was a discrepancy between the reasons, Trump said: "You know, it's sort of a little bit of the same thing.""

The document was redacted. I can't see any reasons why. Seems very suspicious that they're redacting documents that relate to Trump, that should never have been redacted.

Hmm.. this from 2008, way before Trump got into politics.
 

View attachment 1232939

Here's the redacted file that was released at some point. Age Verification | United States Department of Justice
Here's the link.

What was discussed was redacted. Perhaps they thought this was attorney client privilege or some nonsense.

View attachment 1232940

Here's a barely readable copy of what the unredacted file says.

Asked whether Epstein was expelled from Mar al Lago: "No, he was not a member. May have been a guest. Never asked to leave."

Well, Trump said that Epstein was expelled.


"Last week, the White House said Trump kicked Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club "for being a creep".

The last part someone confirms that Epstein was never asked to leave.

Pressed on whether there was a discrepancy between the reasons, Trump said: "You know, it's sort of a little bit of the same thing.""

The document was redacted. I can't see any reasons why. Seems very suspicious that they're redacting documents that relate to Trump, that should never have been redacted.

Hmm.. this from 2008, way before Trump got into politics.
We'll never see the worst of this stuff. And I have no doubt that much has been incinerated. This is a massive, global story, a huge, long-running sexual perversion playground of the elite, and half the country doesn't want to talk about it, just in case.

It would have been much better if Trump played no role in this, if he never knew Epstein. Now all these guys are going to get away with what they did to those young girls. Hopefully enough evidence will remain that they get nailed in a future administration.

For now, though, they're protected, along with him.
 
It is crazy that Biden covered for Trump by not releasing these files. Garland was too busy going after soccer moms are terrorists.

Why did Biden and Garland protect Trump? Does Trump have dirt on them?
 
It is crazy that Biden covered for Trump by not releasing these files. Garland was too busy going after soccer moms are terrorists.

Why did Biden and Garland protect Trump? Does Trump have dirt on them?
it was up to congress not Garland.
Because documents were locked down by ongoing judicial cases, it would require congress to upend those cases.
 
Back
Top Bottom