Elizabeth Warren?

Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
14,201
Reaction score
3,571
Points
185
Liberals out there..... of whom I am _NOT_ one.... Do you like Elizabeth Warren that much?????

as a presidential candidate...

She seems to have fewer troubles with telling the truth than Hillary, is more genuine, and according to one sours has as equal energized base. Surely you are joking in running her? Pretty please?
 
Liberals are deeply conflicted over Pocahontas. They love her politics but hate what her insane need to wear a feathered headdress is doing to the eagle population.

Fortunately she won't beat out Hillary for the Democrat nomination and they won't have to deal with the conflict.
 
She's the female Obama, her past is a total lie, she's a true believer in redistribution, shameless and will do anything for political power
 
She is an extremely smart, very politically savvy, liberal Senator from Massachusetts.

Since a really dumb and incompetent liberal Senator from Illinois was able to whup the GOP...twice...Warren is an extinction level event threat to Republicans. And they will react in their usual retarded way. Making fun of her name, dismissing her as a liberal maniac, etc. Lots and lots and lots of cartoons and stuff.

Everything but come up with superior, well thought out, comprehensive plans to counter hers.
 
Last edited:
Liberals who won't back down terrify conservatives, hence their reaction to Warren.

If she could win, I'd prefer Warren to Hillary, being Warren is actually liberal. But I know the perfect is the enemy of the good, and that the top priority is to keep the Republican authoritarians out of the White House. If Hillary is much more popular and capable of winning, that has to be taken into account.
 
.

She would make an excellent representative of the Left's official push for a Euro-social democracy.

Plus she speaks very simply and very clearly, an excellent communicator for centralized authoritarianism.

Given the GOP's horrific current messaging skills, she would have a real chance to win.

.
 
This woman came up on my radar today. She seems to be a lot more engaging than Hillary, but a bit of a loon. I believe a candidate with ideas is better than one without. The republicans out there are like Jeb Bush, who I detest. Warren is more dangerous than Obama, as she is not as lazy as him.

Bush III means people stay home. And Warren,... g d save us all
 
15th post
.

She would make an excellent representative of the Left's official push for a Euro-social democracy.

Plus she speaks very simply and very clearly, an excellent communicator for centralized authoritarianism.

Given the GOP's horrific current messaging skills, she would have a real chance to win.

.

Yes, I think the ultimate goal of Democrats is to get the U.S. to join the EU, then eventually turn over our sovereignty to United Nations. 1 world socialist government. Democrats are a danger to the U.S.
 
Liberals hate Republicans because they feel they are run by big corporations.
But they don't have a problem with big government controling how we live our lives.
 
Again, look at the potential primary calendar for Hillary and it does not bode well. Iowa: always likes to shake things up. Dean in 2004 and Hillary 2008 went down in a ball of flames. NH: right next door to Warren's home state. Hillary is toast. NV: Union's backed Obama in 2008, could go with Warren or O'malley in 2016. SC: Bill had BIG falling out with SC Democrat Party in 2008 over what he saw as a double-cross to his wife. Scratch SC. So where does she stop momentum plummet? She does not.
 
Back
Top Bottom