Election Security: A Review of major voting anomalies in the 2020 Election

[Mr. Friscus]

Let's just state some facts:

Late in the evening on election night, there were 4 massive voting dumps in the A.M.

The four vote updates in question are:

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
2. Ann update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

So in Michigan, during a 147,000 vote dump, Joe Biden got 96% of the votes, and Donald Trump got 4% of the votes. These are all statistically highly improbable for even the most heavily Democrat areas in the country. By any statistical analysis, it stinks to high heavens. If all 4 of those dumps occurred within statistical norms of the other near 9,000 voting dumps analyzed, from all sorts of counties, Trump wins all 4 states.

Meanwhile, notice, this isn't the possibility of "widespread" fraud, just massive vote dumps into 4 spots that could possibly flip the election. Also, these vote dump totals are way higher than what norms are as far as what is possible in counting votes. All of these were an impossible massive jump in productivity.

Here's the conclusion of the Study:

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates. The findings presented by this report [28]suggest that four vote count updates — which collectively were decisive in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and thus decisive of a critical forty-two electoral votes — are especially anomalous and merit further investigation.

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

votepatternanalysis.substack.com

We saw unprecedented and pretty much impossible (based on all historic voting data) data dumps late in the night.

Democrats who say "There's no evidence of voter fraud" need to put the shoe on the other foot and ask themselves if they'd trust such numbers for Trump in swing states that barely went his way. Of course, they wouldn't.

If you have nothing to hide, you should have no problem wanting to make the voting process as secure as possible.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Billy000 if you wanted your evidence of foul play... here it is.

 

[BULLDOG]

Let's just state some facts:

Late in the evening on election night, there were 4 massive voting dumps in the A.M.

The four vote updates in question are:

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
2. Ann update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

So in Michigan, during a 147,000 vote dump, Joe Biden got 96% of the votes, and Donald Trump got 4% of the votes. These are all statistically highly improbable for even the most heavily Democrat areas in the country. By any statistical analysis, it stinks to high heavens. If all 4 of those dumps occurred within statistical norms of the other near 9,000 voting dumps analyzed, from all sorts of counties, Trump wins all 4 states.

Meanwhile, notice, this isn't the possibility of "widespread" fraud, just massive vote dumps into 4 spots that could possibly flip the election. Also, these vote dump totals are way higher than what norms are as far as what is possible in counting votes. All of these were an impossible massive jump in productivity.

Here's the conclusion of the Study:

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates. The findings presented by this report [28]suggest that four vote count updates — which collectively were decisive in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and thus decisive of a critical forty-two electoral votes — are especially anomalous and merit further investigation.

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

votepatternanalysis.substack.com

We saw unprecedented and pretty much impossible (based on all historic voting data) data dumps late in the night.

Democrats who say "There's no evidence of voter fraud" need to put the shoe on the other foot and ask themselves if they'd trust such numbers for Trump in swing states that barely went his way. Of course, they wouldn't.

If you have nothing to hide, you should have no problem wanting to make the voting process as secure as possible.

The Bengals captured the AFC North and then knocked off the top-seeded Titans and the two-time defending AFC champion Chiefs. They also overcame the franchise's stigma of being a team that always came up short in big moments. Cincinnati did that in spades to become the most unexpected Super Bowl team ever.
Statistically, there is no way they should have made that many points, but they did.

 

[MarathonMike]

Computer Forensic Experts uncovered multiple election violations related to Dominion Voting Systems in Arizona. I watched the findings being presented to the Arizona election board live on C-SPAN. Absolutely airtight proof of INTERNET ACCESS of the voting systems before, during and after the election among other violations. The election board did nothing about it, and buried the results..

 

[Skylar]

Let's just state some facts:

Late in the evening on election night, there were 4 massive voting dumps in the A.M.

The four vote updates in question are:

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
2. Ann update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

So in Michigan, during a 147,000 vote dump, Joe Biden got 96% of the votes, and Donald Trump got 4% of the votes. These are all statistically highly improbable for even the most heavily Democrat areas in the country. By any statistical analysis, it stinks to high heavens. If all 4 of those dumps occurred within statistical norms of the other near 9,000 voting dumps analyzed, from all sorts of counties, Trump wins all 4 states.

Meanwhile, notice, this isn't the possibility of "widespread" fraud, just massive vote dumps into 4 spots that could possibly flip the election. Also, these vote dump totals are way higher than what norms are as far as what is possible in counting votes. All of these were an impossible massive jump in productivity.

Here's the conclusion of the Study:

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates. The findings presented by this report [28]suggest that four vote count updates — which collectively were decisive in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and thus decisive of a critical forty-two electoral votes — are especially anomalous and merit further investigation.

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

votepatternanalysis.substack.com

We saw unprecedented and pretty much impossible (based on all historic voting data) data dumps late in the night.

Democrats who say "There's no evidence of voter fraud" need to put the shoe on the other foot and ask themselves if they'd trust such numbers for Trump in swing states that barely went his way. Of course, they wouldn't.

If you have nothing to hide, you should have no problem wanting to make the voting process as secure as possible.

Your poster child, Michigan....was a clerical error with Shiawassee county that accidentally added 150,000 votes rather than 15,000. And this only its reporting to Decision Desk HQ. It was was corrected within hours and never impacted actual vote counts. Only what was reported via Decision Desk HQ.

Big Liars ignored the correction, cited the pre-correction stats, and then declared fraud. There's a reason why EVERY legal challenge they've ever made has failed.

"However, Decision Desk HQ explained in a Twitter thread that the jump in votes was as a result of a “clerical error” in Shiawassee County, where an extra zero had been added to Biden’s vote tally here; . Decision Desk HQ updated its data to show that Biden received 15,371 votes in Shiawassee (here;"

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-vote-spikes-in-wisconsin-michigan-and-pennsylvania-do-not-prove-ele-idUSKBN27Q304/

 

[BULLDOG]

Computer Forensic Experts uncovered multiple election violations related to Dominion Voting Systems in Arizona. I watched the findings being presented to the Arizona election board live on C-SPAN. Absolutely airtight proof of INTERNET ACCESS of the voting systems before, during and after the election among other violations. The election board did nothing about it, and buried the results..

Was that the top-quality information supplied by that crazy pillow guy?

 

[Skylar]

Computer Forensic Experts uncovered multiple election violations related to Dominion Voting Systems in Arizona. I watched the findings being presented to the Arizona election board live on C-SPAN. Absolutely airtight proof of INTERNET ACCESS of the voting systems before, during and after the election among other violations. The election board did nothing about it, and buried the results..

Which 'computer forensic experts', what election violations, backed with what evidence?

And I'm guessing by 'buried the results', you mean you can't actually back this up with evidence.

 

[candycorn]

Which 'computer forensic experts',

Yeah, the link has no named author.

 

[Oddball]

Computer Forensic Experts uncovered multiple election violations related to Dominion Voting Systems in Arizona. I watched the findings being presented to the Arizona election board live on C-SPAN. Absolutely airtight proof of INTERNET ACCESS of the voting systems before, during and after the election among other violations. The election board did nothing about it, and buried the results..

We also watched the hearing in Georgia, where the computer expert came in during the session to inform them that he had hacked into the machines -which were supposedly not connected to the internet- and was able to manipulate the information for the ongoing runoff election in real time.

BREAKING: Stanford Researcher Hacked Georgia Voting Machine, Confirms 'Pump And Dump' Vote Manipulation Possible

"Someone can actually siphon off that data, modify the data, and then feed it right back into the system, or kind of do a pump and dump in real time"

nationalfile.com

 

[MarathonMike]

We also watched the hearing in Georgia, where the computer expert came in during the session to inform them that he had hacked into the machines -which were supposedly not connected to the internet- and was able to manipulate the information for the ongoing runoff election in real time.

BREAKING: Stanford Researcher Hacked Georgia Voting Machine, Confirms 'Pump And Dump' Vote Manipulation Possible

"Someone can actually siphon off that data, modify the data, and then feed it right back into the system, or kind of do a pump and dump in real time"

nationalfile.com

Every American should have been horrified at the findings in Arizona and Georgia by computer hacking experts investigation. A panel of computer experts in Texas rejected Dominion Voting Systems for their vulnerabilities and the fact that they contain floating point based algorithms designed for "weighting" voting results. All of this was brushed aside.

 

[Blaster]

Our elections have been compromised and need to be fixed.

 

[Oddball]

Every American should have been horrified at the findings in Arizona and Georgia by computer hacking experts investigation. A panel of computer experts in Texas rejected Dominion Voting Systems for their vulnerabilities and the fact that they contain floating point based algorithms designed for "weighting" voting results. All of this was brushed aside.

It wasn't just brushed aside....It has been thrown into the memory hole and you are derided as a "conspiracy theorist" if you even bring it up.

Orwell missed by only 30 years.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[MarathonMike]

Orwell missed by only 30 years.

40 but whatever. A Great book that should still be required reading as it was at my high school.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AZ soooo many Illegals registered to vote it’s an act of war

 

[Care4all]

Computer Forensic Experts uncovered multiple election violations related to Dominion Voting Systems in Arizona. I watched the findings being presented to the Arizona election board live on C-SPAN. Absolutely airtight proof of INTERNET ACCESS of the voting systems before, during and after the election among other violations. The election board did nothing about it, and buried the results..

They hand counted the ballots in a recount....any machine/computer/internet shenanigans are nullified in a hand count of ballots.

 

[Care4all]

Let's just state some facts:

Late in the evening on election night, there were 4 massive voting dumps in the A.M.

The four vote updates in question are:

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
2. Ann update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

So in Michigan, during a 147,000 vote dump, Joe Biden got 96% of the votes, and Donald Trump got 4% of the votes. These are all statistically highly improbable for even the most heavily Democrat areas in the country. By any statistical analysis, it stinks to high heavens. If all 4 of those dumps occurred within statistical norms of the other near 9,000 voting dumps analyzed, from all sorts of counties, Trump wins all 4 states.

Meanwhile, notice, this isn't the possibility of "widespread" fraud, just massive vote dumps into 4 spots that could possibly flip the election. Also, these vote dump totals are way higher than what norms are as far as what is possible in counting votes. All of these were an impossible massive jump in productivity.

Here's the conclusion of the Study:

This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates. The findings presented by this report [28]suggest that four vote count updates — which collectively were decisive in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, and thus decisive of a critical forty-two electoral votes — are especially anomalous and merit further investigation.

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

votepatternanalysis.substack.com

We saw unprecedented and pretty much impossible (based on all historic voting data) data dumps late in the night.

Democrats who say "There's no evidence of voter fraud" need to put the shoe on the other foot and ask themselves if they'd trust such numbers for Trump in swing states that barely went his way. Of course, they wouldn't.

If you have nothing to hide, you should have no problem wanting to make the voting process as secure as possible.

This is a perfect example of:

If you can't convince people with actual evidence, then baffle them with your bullshit!

The article has no previous election results to compare with the 2020 election to get his algorithms.... or trends that he thinks should repeat or happen.

There has never been an election where early votes including absentee, were more or equal to election day votes.

There has never been an election where democrats were lead to vote absentee ballot for safety, and republicans were lead by Trump to vote in person, on election day and not via absentee.

There also were hand recounts done on the ballots by batch, showing no glitches or shenanigans or machine dump cheating, none were found.

There would have been proof of cheating, in the hand recounts....and there were not.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Your poster child, Michigan....was a clerical error with Shiawassee county that accidentally added 150,000 votes rather than 15,000. And this only its reporting to Decision Desk HQ. It was was corrected within hours and never impacted actual vote counts. Only what was reported via Decision Desk HQ.

1. They fact that it could happen is enough to raise concerns.. what if it wasn’t caught?
2. Even if you wrote off Michigan, you have 3 other extremely suspicious anamolies.. which you didn’t address. Even if one is discounted (which isn’t entirely), it doesn’t mean all others are.

 

[Care4all]

We also watched the hearing in Georgia, where the computer expert came in during the session to inform them that he had hacked into the machines -which were supposedly not connected to the internet- and was able to manipulate the information for the ongoing runoff election in real time.

BREAKING: Stanford Researcher Hacked Georgia Voting Machine, Confirms 'Pump And Dump' Vote Manipulation Possible

"Someone can actually siphon off that data, modify the data, and then feed it right back into the system, or kind of do a pump and dump in real time"

nationalfile.com

https://sos.ga.gov/news/fact-check-georgia-senate-masquerades-failed-treasure-hunter-hacker-and-election-security

This is who you trusted, without thought...oddball? FAKE NEWS

---------------

(Atlanta) -- Yesterday, during a Georgia State Senate hearing, failed treasure hunter, J. Hutton Pulitzer, or Commander Pulitzer (no record of military experience), claimed that he had “hacked” Georgia’s voting system. The treasure hunter provided no evidence during the Senate hearing that he had done so, only claiming it had happened.

“Fake news is hard enough to combat when mainstream media outlets push it out, but when a small cadre of Georgia legislators do it, it’s a whole different story,” said Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. “These legislators need to stop calling their own reelections illegitimate and focus on getting out the vote for the January 5 elections. The mistrust they are sowing is depressing turnout. If Senators Loeffler and Perdue lose on January 5, the Georgia state legislators have only themselves to blame.”

In another election disinformation filled hearing, a small group of Republicans in the Georgia State Senate featured the claims of failed inventor and failed treasure hunter J. Hutton Pulitzer as a star witness. In his presentation, Hutton Pulitzer, formerly J. Jovan Philylaw, claimed without providing any evidence that he had “hacked” a poll pad. He then went on to claim that meant that the entire voting system was compromised even though the poll pad, like the poll books which they have replaced, are never connected to the rest of the voting system.


----------------


Despite Hutton’s claims, the Poll Pads are the only piece of election infrastructure that is ever hooked up to the internet or connected to devices that are hooked up to the internet. The poll pads have that capability so election workers can download updated voter lists to the poll pads that are used to check people in on Election Day. However, the Wifi capability is disabled before the poll pads are put in to use at the polling place.

Additionally, the touch screen interfaces and attached printers are never attached to the poll pads and are air-gapped so they cannot be connected to the internet. Finally, the scanners, which scan and tabulate the printed paper ballots that voters can review before casting, are not connected to any of the other equipment at any point either.

In a statement, poll pad creator KnowInk said: “The assertions made about unauthorized access to our systems are patently false. The man claiming that someone ‘got into’ our systems did not happen according to our forensic analysis. There was no ‘hack,’ there was no ‘back door’ entry, there was no ‘pump and dump,’ and there was no access through a ‘thermostat’ located hundreds of miles away in Savannah.”

 

[Skylar]

1. They fact that it could happen is enough to raise concerns.. what if it wasn’t caught?

So we acknowledge it was caught. Obliterating your entire Michigan conspiracy theory. You already knew you were spewing debunked nonsense.

AND......it wouldn't have mattered if it was caught or not, as the mistake wasn't in the actual vote count but in the Decision Desk HQ reporting. Decision Desk HQ is a private company that provides real-time election results. A mistake in their feed doesn't actually change the election results.

All of which you already know. But really hope we don't.

2. Even if you wrote off Michigan, you have 3 other extremely suspicious anamolies.. which you didn’t address. Even if one is discounted (which isn’t entirely), it doesn’t mean all others are.

Right after you factually establish your claims. Given your flagrant and intentionally misrepresentation of Michigan, you'll need to factually establish, with reliable external sources, each of your remaining 3 claims.

You simply 'typing' there was anomoly factually establishes nothing.

Please do so now.