Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[bodecea]

If you support this BASELESS move by Colorado, you support other states doing to to any candidate for any reason.

As long as you support that, LETS GO!

Not for any reason...read the 14th Amendment some day.

 

[Care4all]

If you support this BASELESS move by Colorado, you support other states doing to to any candidate for any reason.

As long as you support that, LETS GO!

Nope. This Colorado case involves Colorado State codified law.... and is the reason why their courts took it up.

Most if not all other states can not piggy back off of it, unless they have their own state law involved....and my understanding is that the other states do not have the same Colorado state law....

Basically, it is more legally complicated than meets the eye.

 

[Meister]

Nope. This Colorado case involves Colorado State codified law.... and is the reason why their courts took it up.

Most if not all other states can not piggy back off of it, unless they have their own state law involved....and my understanding is that the other states do not have the same Colorado state law....

Basically, it is more legally complicated than meets the eye.

Basically, it's cancelling the democrats leading candidate in an upcoming election. That's basically it.
He was never charged with insurrection, and was never convicted of insurrection. This kind of shenanigans
is exactly what happens in countries with dictators and third world countries with dictators. Make no mistake about that.

 

[Care4all]

Basically, it's cancelling the democrats leading candidate in an upcoming election. That's basically it.
He was never charged with insurrection, and was never convicted of insurrection. This kind of shenanigans
is exactly what happens in countries with dictators and third world countries with dictators. Make no mistake about that.

Nope. This does not happen in third world countries....

 

[Meister]

Nope. This does not happen in third world countries....

 

[Hum Dinger]

Better read that 14th Amendment section 3 again. It says nothing about ex- Presidents.

Seriously?

Section 3​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

 

[Hum Dinger]

If you support this BASELESS move by Colorado, you support other states doing to to any candidate for any reason.

As long as you support that, LETS GO!

No, it would have to be determined that the person had engaged in insurrection based on 'preponderance of the evidence'.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Seriously? No, the 14th A. Sec. 3 does not require congress to take any action. It does allow Congress to reverse the decision to bar someone from holding office.

Try reading it before you post.

Dumbass Rebellion or insurrection is a federal offense that criminalizes inciting, engaging in, or giving aid and comfort to any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or its laws. A rebellion is usually an organized, armed, and often violent resistance to government authority.
It's not a state issue especially since the offense didn't occured within that states borders

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Seriously?

Section 3​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

But

Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Better read that 14th Amendment section 3 again. It says nothing about ex- Presidents.

It also says the decision is up to both house and Senate. Not a state

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Trump sure knows his cult.

So Colorado doesn't have done magical federal authority

 

[Slade3200]

Stupid leftard, READ the Constitution..it's right there in front of you in black and white.

I did, and I made an argument that you straight up ignored. Try again

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Agreed. No one is claiming otherwise.

According to Colorado supreme court it does

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I did, and I made an argument that you straight up ignored. Try again

What juridiction does Colorado have in DC ?

 

[bodecea]

So....how many here have sent threats to those Colorado Justices and their families so far?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So....how many here have sent threats to those Colorado Justices and their families so far?

What juridiction does Colorado have in DC in regards to federal matters?

 

[kyzr]

So....how many here have sent threats to those Colorado Justices and their families so far?

If there were any, they were probably DNC or FBI (Waffen SS) operatives

 

[Slade3200]

What juridiction does Colorado have in DC ?

They don’t have jurisdiction. That’s a pretty silly question. If you have a point to make why don’t you just make it and save a needless back and forth?

 

[BackAgain]

It was a lawsuit in a court of law where both sides presented evidence and arguments. It wasn’t a criminal proceeding, But the case went to court and a judgment was made. That’s the American way bucko

It was a hearing. Nothing more.

 

[Marener]

According to Colorado supreme court it does

This is false. Next time try reading the decision.