Election Forfeit?

[Daryl Hunt]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

The Constitution does not allow for the impeachment of a President seeking information about the undermining of an American election nor does it allow for the impeachment of a President looking into corrupt private deals like with an American Vice President (Biden) using his offical position to take heat off his son and get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was looking into corruption of a foreign company with ties to Biden's son Hunter. We need to follow the Constitution and stop this kind of shit.

The BS about trying to create a circus 3 ring act to make us look away from Rump using his position to try and dig up dirt on an opponent IS against the Constitution. Obama was extremely quiet while the Russian thing was going on. He could have opened the flood gates up but didn't because that might have been interpreted as working to affect an election. And it probably would have. Instead, he noted it, reported to the next President who did nothing with it because the next President benefited greatly from it. In reality, it should have been first on Rumps agenda. But no, he hip pocketed it for later use.

Rump created the Biden Son thing to cover for his own crime. There is no crime by Biden. Biden did what was best for this Nation and the rest of the Free World. Biden's Son had nothing to do with the decision and the outcome. But Rump wants to you took "Over There" so you won't look at his "High Crime". Not going to work this time, cupcake. Especially if we follow the Constitution.

 

[Leo123]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

The Constitution does not allow for the impeachment of a President seeking information about the undermining of an American election nor does it allow for the impeachment of a President looking into corrupt private deals like with an American Vice President (Biden) using his offical position to take heat off his son and get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was looking into corruption of a foreign company with ties to Biden's son Hunter. We need to follow the Constitution and stop this kind of shit.

The BS about trying to create a circus 3 ring act to make us look away from Rump using his position to try and dig up dirt on an opponent IS against the Constitution. Obama was extremely quiet while the Russian thing was going on. He could have opened the flood gates up but didn't because that might have been interpreted as working to affect an election. And it probably would have. Instead, he noted it, reported to the next President who did nothing with it because the next President benefited greatly from it. In reality, it should have been first on Rumps agenda. But no, he hip pocketed it for later use.

Rump created the Biden Son thing to cover for his own crime. There is no crime by Biden. Biden did what was best for this Nation and the rest of the Free World. Biden's Son had nothing to do with the decision and the outcome. But Rump wants to you took "Over There" so you won't look at his "High Crime". Not going to work this time, cupcake. Especially if we follow the Constitution.

Well have fun with your msm fantasy. Hillary and the dnc are the ones lying to a FISA court in order to use a fake dossier to dig up dirt on Trump. BTW Biden ADMITTED a quid pro quo to get his druggy son off the hook.

 

[westwall]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

The Constitution does not allow for the impeachment of a President seeking information about the undermining of an American election nor does it allow for the impeachment of a President looking into corrupt private deals like with an American Vice President (Biden) using his offical position to take heat off his son and get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was looking into corruption of a foreign company with ties to Biden's son Hunter. We need to follow the Constitution and stop this kind of shit.

The BS about trying to create a circus 3 ring act to make us look away from Rump using his position to try and dig up dirt on an opponent IS against the Constitution. Obama was extremely quiet while the Russian thing was going on. He could have opened the flood gates up but didn't because that might have been interpreted as working to affect an election. And it probably would have. Instead, he noted it, reported to the next President who did nothing with it because the next President benefited greatly from it. In reality, it should have been first on Rumps agenda. But no, he hip pocketed it for later use.

Rump created the Biden Son thing to cover for his own crime. There is no crime by Biden. Biden did what was best for this Nation and the rest of the Free World. Biden's Son had nothing to do with the decision and the outcome. But Rump wants to you took "Over There" so you won't look at his "High Crime". Not going to work this time, cupcake. Especially if we follow the Constitution.

Well have fun with your msm fantasy. Hillary and the dnc are the ones lying to a FISA court in order to use a fake dossier to dig up dirt on Trump. BTW Biden ADMITTED a quid pro quo to get his druggy son off the hook.

No, he didn't admit to it, he boasted about how he extorted Ukraine.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

The Constitution does not allow for the impeachment of a President seeking information about the undermining of an American election nor does it allow for the impeachment of a President looking into corrupt private deals like with an American Vice President (Biden) using his offical position to take heat off his son and get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was looking into corruption of a foreign company with ties to Biden's son Hunter. We need to follow the Constitution and stop this kind of shit.

The BS about trying to create a circus 3 ring act to make us look away from Rump using his position to try and dig up dirt on an opponent IS against the Constitution. Obama was extremely quiet while the Russian thing was going on. He could have opened the flood gates up but didn't because that might have been interpreted as working to affect an election. And it probably would have. Instead, he noted it, reported to the next President who did nothing with it because the next President benefited greatly from it. In reality, it should have been first on Rumps agenda. But no, he hip pocketed it for later use.

Rump created the Biden Son thing to cover for his own crime. There is no crime by Biden. Biden did what was best for this Nation and the rest of the Free World. Biden's Son had nothing to do with the decision and the outcome. But Rump wants to you took "Over There" so you won't look at his "High Crime". Not going to work this time, cupcake. Especially if we follow the Constitution.

Well have fun with your msm fantasy. Hillary and the dnc are the ones lying to a FISA court in order to use a fake dossier to dig up dirt on Trump. BTW Biden ADMITTED a quid pro quo to get his druggy son off the hook.

More "Hey, Look Over There" from you. You can't change the fact that Rump broke the law when he enlisted the help of a foreign agent to try and influence the outcome of an election. It's against the law and the Constitution no matter how you try and paint it. It doesn't matter what another person has done or is doing. "Look Over There" doesn't work in a legal defense. Rump is guilty. The only thing that hasn't happened is the falling of the gavel. And that is going to happen very soon. If it won't happen in congress, it's certainly going to happen in the public opinion. Enough of a bad thing. The line has been drawn.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

The Constitution does not allow for the impeachment of a President seeking information about the undermining of an American election nor does it allow for the impeachment of a President looking into corrupt private deals like with an American Vice President (Biden) using his offical position to take heat off his son and get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired who was looking into corruption of a foreign company with ties to Biden's son Hunter. We need to follow the Constitution and stop this kind of shit.

The BS about trying to create a circus 3 ring act to make us look away from Rump using his position to try and dig up dirt on an opponent IS against the Constitution. Obama was extremely quiet while the Russian thing was going on. He could have opened the flood gates up but didn't because that might have been interpreted as working to affect an election. And it probably would have. Instead, he noted it, reported to the next President who did nothing with it because the next President benefited greatly from it. In reality, it should have been first on Rumps agenda. But no, he hip pocketed it for later use.

Rump created the Biden Son thing to cover for his own crime. There is no crime by Biden. Biden did what was best for this Nation and the rest of the Free World. Biden's Son had nothing to do with the decision and the outcome. But Rump wants to you took "Over There" so you won't look at his "High Crime". Not going to work this time, cupcake. Especially if we follow the Constitution.

Well have fun with your msm fantasy. Hillary and the dnc are the ones lying to a FISA court in order to use a fake dossier to dig up dirt on Trump. BTW Biden ADMITTED a quid pro quo to get his druggy son off the hook.

No, he didn't admit to it, he boasted about how he extorted Ukraine.

And he admitted to doing it to get rid of a corrupt part of the Ukrainian Investigation so they could get a more honest one in place. With the support of the sitting President, Sitting Congress, and most of the Free World. I doubt seriously if his Son had anything to do with this since the investigation into the company his son was involved in went ahead anyway. No matter what you think, Biden showed more than a bit of Diplomacy rarely seen in public but it's done every day. It was hardball when dealing with Russian Corruption inside of Ukraine.

Biden has enough skeletons in his closets that I am sure that we can all dig up all sorts of dirt without inventing something from this. All this does is show the desperation that Rump and his band of criminals are willing to stoop to.

 

[HenryBHough]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

Impossible.

There is no U.S. Constitution.

It was shredded and smoked for its hemp content on Day one of The Kenyan Candidate's occupancy of the once White House.



Above intended solely as bait the liberal left cannot resist.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

Impossible.

There is no U.S. Constitution.

It was shredded and smoked for its hemp content on Day one of The Kenyan Candidate's occupancy of the once White House.

Wow, another "Hey, look over there" routine. You should be on stage with that act. In fact, here comes a stage right now. Get under it.

 

[Leo123]

And he admitted to doing it to get rid of a corrupt part of the Ukrainian Investigation so they could get a more honest one in place. With the support of the sitting President, Sitting Congress, and most of the Free World. I doubt seriously if his Son had anything to do with this since the investigation into the company his son was involved in went ahead anyway. No matter what you think, Biden showed more than a bit of Diplomacy rarely seen in public but it's done every day. It was hardball when dealing with Russian Corruption inside of Ukraine.

Biden has enough skeletons in his closets that I am sure that we can all dig up all sorts of dirt without inventing something from this. All this does is show the desperation that Rump and his band of criminals are willing to stoop to.

Ha! Ha! Boy that's a GOOD one!! Gee it just so happens that Biden's SON was being investigated by the prosecutor that Biden called 'corrupt'....I mean, just how gullible can you guys get? BTW the investigation was never completed. Gosh........I wonder why? Could it have something to do with the $1 Billion Sleepy Joe threatened to withhold if his son's prosecutor wasn't fired??? Come on Daryl, be honest, if that were Trump and his son, you'd be spouting blood from your rump.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And he admitted to doing it to get rid of a corrupt part of the Ukrainian Investigation so they could get a more honest one in place. With the support of the sitting President, Sitting Congress, and most of the Free World. I doubt seriously if his Son had anything to do with this since the investigation into the company his son was involved in went ahead anyway. No matter what you think, Biden showed more than a bit of Diplomacy rarely seen in public but it's done every day. It was hardball when dealing with Russian Corruption inside of Ukraine.

Biden has enough skeletons in his closets that I am sure that we can all dig up all sorts of dirt without inventing something from this. All this does is show the desperation that Rump and his band of criminals are willing to stoop to.

Ha! Ha! Boy that's a GOOD one!! Gee it just so happens that Biden's SON was being investigated by the prosecutor that Biden called 'corrupt'....I mean, just how gullible can you guys get? BTW the investigation was never completed. Gosh........I wonder why? Could it have something to do with the $1 Billion Sleepy Joe threatened to withhold if his son's prosecutor wasn't fired??? Come on Daryl, be honest, if that were Trump and his son, you'd be spouting blood from your rump.

Apples and oranges. You can make anything out of anything if you look deep enough and use enough imagination. In this case, even if it were true, it still doesn't take the sting out of Rump throwing away the Constitution and Voting Laws, You are just using "Hey, look over there" to try and hide Federal Presidential Crimes.

 

[Leo123]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

That’s looney

 

[forkup]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We just need to follow the Constitution. You know, the law of the Land. The Laws that you Rumpsters use as toilet paper when it suits you. Get used to it. You are being forced to follow it right now. And your whining is entertaining.

No that’s the Democrats who shot on the Constitution. They want to rip it up. Your Demtards in NY made it illegal to say Illegal Alien. Who is pissing on the first and second amendment. Yes liberal scumbags like you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow, another "Hey, look over there" episode.

8 Years of obama it was hey look over there

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

 

[forkup]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

It's not a deflection when it's true
When the media abuses it's first amendment right they should lose that right just like when a gun owner abuses his second amendment right he should lose that right.

 

[okfine]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

He knows no better.

 

[forkup]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

It's not a deflection when it's true
When the media abuses it's first amendment right they should lose that right just like when a gun owner abuses his second amendment right he should lose that right.

Still deflecting and yes it is a deflection. I engaged the central assertion of the OP. You now have twice gone of in a tangent that's the opposite of what the poster of this OP claims. If you don't want to engage what I'm saying that is fine. Refrain from answering than altogheter.

 

[forkup]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

He knows no better.

Probably not. But I'll be damned if I'll let people spout nonsense to me without a challenge. It's a fools errand and ego driven bit that's the nature of most honest people here I think.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

It's not a deflection when it's true
When the media abuses it's first amendment right they should lose that right just like when a gun owner abuses his second amendment right he should lose that right.

Still deflecting and yes it is a deflection. I engaged the central assertion of the OP. You now have twice gone of in a tangent that's the opposite of what the poster of this OP claims. If you don't want to engage what I'm saying that is fine. Refrain from answering than altogheter.

shut the fuck up about your goddamn whiny ass deflection. it's only a deflection to you because you can't handle the goddamn truth

 

[bigrebnc1775]

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

He knows no better.

Probably not. But I'll be damned if I'll let people spout nonsense to me without a challenge. It's a fools errand and ego driven bit that's the nature of most honest people here I think.

We need to stop the Democrats from obstructing a duly elected President based on false accusations. I propose a penalty that would force Democrats to sit out the next election. Maybe that would stop them from trying to execute a coup and thwart their illegal and blatant power grab.

We have seen them foist false accusations of treason (Trump/Russia collusion), false accusations of obstruction of justice and now, they are trying to convince everyone that impeachment is needed because of their made up story about a phone call.

Anyways, I say make them sit out the next election.

What is the false acussation? Oh and while you are at it, show me a politician on the left who uses the word treason which has a specific meaning under the law, a word that Trump btw has used plenty of times to describe Democrats.

And also show how impeachment is a coup. If you insist on using words that have legal meaning and propose penalties on false accusation, please substanciate yours. Seems only fair.

Democrats don't like using the word treason because it opens a can of worms on their own actions.

That's a deflection. This OP stated that he wanted to impose penalties on Democrats for issuing false accusations. I merely asked him, or you if you feel so inclined, to substanciate. First his claim about what Dems did. Second the claims made by this president who is using the language that the poster is accusing the Dems of using. Like coup and treason.

If your central assertion is that false accusations warrant an exclusion from elections, those are fair request.

He knows no better.

Probably not. But I'll be damned if I'll let people spout nonsense to me without a challenge. It's a fools errand and ego driven bit that's the nature of most honest people here I think.

ok fool it's your errand stop spouting nonsense