Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with youBecause if you don't bring it up in the specific context of orientation and gender, you aren't discussing orientation and gender. Saying someone has parents, two mommies, two daddies, one and one, or (more commonly in poor minority communities) being raised by grandma and grandpa is talking about situations, not trying to explain about orientation and gender bullshit, and THAT's the purpose of laws like this.
If you guys want to die on this hill via legal warfare, have at it. This is a losing cause for someone trying to be a literalist snarky fuck.
I agree with you
but rightwinger is seeing it the way sleazy ACLU lawyer and democrat judge may choose to see it
they can scramble the common meaning of the law into something completely unforeseen
which is how the left will decriminalize pedophilia
If the school is delving into gender other than boys and girls they are wrong
That was not the intention of the lawAccording to the new law…..Both “Boy” and “Girl” are gender identities and can’t be taught until 4th grade
Republicans wrote the lawThat was not the intention of the law
but sharp lib lawyers are paid to split hairs and twist the meaning so the outcome could be as you say
I am not disagreeing with youRepublicans wrote the law
They could have used wording that specifically applies to homosexuality and transgenderism
They chose to use vague terms like sexual orientation and gender identification
As such, they need to live with the bill they wrote
The law was mean spirited and deserves to be attacked
I agree with you
but rightwinger is seeing it the way sleazy ACLU lawyer and democrat judge may choose to see it
they can scramble the common meaning of the law into something completely unforeseen
which is how the left will decriminalize pedophilia
I think if the law is applied as written, it will die
Florida already has laws against pedophiliaI'm not sure they would go that far, but they sure as hell will try to lower consent laws down to say 14 or so.
Pedophilia is attraction to pre-pubescents, and I'm not sure even they will go that far.
As for the lawfare thing, yep, that's the hill they want to die on apparently, as with men competing in women's sports.
Florida already has laws against pedophilia
Which any lib judge can declare unconstitutionalFlorida already has laws against pedophilia
Show me any case where pedophilia has been ruled unconstitutionalWhich any lib judge can declare unconstitutional
As I stated, progs aren't going to go that far, but I'm sure they are interested in knocking down those ol' consent laws to like 14 or so.
It is Republicans who marry their 14 year old cousins
Go vote for Roy Moore
If a teacher reads a book about a family with a Mommy and Daddy, that is basically presenting a normal life situation to boys and girls. It is not a discussion about sexual orientation. If a teacher reads a book about a family with '2 daddies' that is presenting an aberrant lifestyle to boys and girls. No one is going to sue a school system for reading a book to kid that presents a family with a mommy and daddy.The Bill states “Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards."
The bill does not specifically specify discussion about homosexuality.
So if a teacher reads a book about a family with a Mommy and a Daddy, isn’t that a discussion of their sexual orientation?
Is a book written about a little girl or a little boy identifying their gender identity?
According to the law, a school system can be sued if a teacher provides instruction about ANY sexual orientation …..Heterosexual, Homosexual or Transsexual
Since you condone teaching kids that men should bugger each other, why would that bother you?It is Republicans who marry their 14 year old cousins
Go vote for Roy Moore
No because heterosexual is normal.The law doesn’t say talking about sex
It specifically prohibits talking about sexual orientation without specifying WHICH orientation
So that would mean discussing heterosexual as well as homosexual orientations
There is a first time for everythingShow me any case where pedophilia has been ruled unconstitutional
