Do meritless people prefer Marxism because they know they will finish last in a merit oriented free market economy?

EMH

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2021
Messages
22,301
Reaction score
13,522
Points
2,288
Sure seems that way. The more America has practiced preferential treatment, Affirmative Action, DEI whatever, the recipients of the benefits of being promoted on that which lacks merit and would not achieve without the preference seem to believe they are entitled to such preference on everything.

Exhibit A is Kamala, a completely meritless Marxist who thinks, because she is female and not white, she doesn't have to do press conferences...



It must be racist and sexist to ask Kamala to do what every single major Presidential nominee has done in modern history. The Marxist doctrine says that doesn't matter, only being Marxist and getting preferential treatment matters, and those who think Kamala should be held to the same standard will be branded as racist and sexist.

Is that really what we are about to do, to elect a "President" who is completely meritless and too incompetent and unqualified to hold even a simple press conference???
 
Sure seems that way. The more America has practiced preferential treatment, Affirmative Action, DEI whatever, the recipients of the benefits of being promoted on that which lacks merit and would not achieve without the preference seem to believe they are entitled to such preference on everything.

Exhibit A is Kamala, a completely meritless Marxist who thinks, because she is female and not white, she doesn't have to do press conferences...



It must be racist and sexist to ask Kamala to do what every single major Presidential nominee has done in modern history. The Marxist doctrine says that doesn't matter, only being Marxist and getting preferential treatment matters, and those who think Kamala should be held to the same standard will be branded as racist and sexist.

Is that really what we are about to do, to elect a "President" who is completely meritless and too incompetent and unqualified to hold even a simple press conference???
We really need a facepalm button in the response menu.
 
Well, Harris has accomplished something no candidate has done before. She got the Democrat nomination without a single vote after the party nullified the votes and pulled a "bait and switch"!!!
The Democrats should be forced to change their name. Everything they do is anti-Democratic.
 
A couple cycles without massive election theft and the party that likes to fuck kids will be, once again, reduced to marginal fringefucks living under rocks.

Trying to normalize a cowardly AWOL deserter with a farm animal fetish and some kind of depraved, Tampon obsession has taken it too far. We won't even talk about the illiterate, colored woman that has to hide in the basement for another 70 days.


TamponTimmy on a date.... love is love, whatever.

 
I have read enough of the writings of Karl Marx to know that Kamala Harris is not a Marxist.

The Right uses "Marxist" the way the left uses "racist." In each case, the purpose is not to advance a serious conversation, but to suppress it.

Name calling is the lowest form of discourse.
 
Sure seems that way. The more America has practiced preferential treatment, Affirmative Action, DEI whatever, the recipients of the benefits of being promoted on that which lacks merit and would not achieve without the preference seem to believe they are entitled to such preference on everything.

Exhibit A is Kamala, a completely meritless Marxist who thinks, because she is female and not white, she doesn't have to do press conferences...



It must be racist and sexist to ask Kamala to do what every single major Presidential nominee has done in modern history. The Marxist doctrine says that doesn't matter, only being Marxist and getting preferential treatment matters, and those who think Kamala should be held to the same standard will be branded as racist and sexist.

Is that really what we are about to do, to elect a "President" who is completely meritless and too incompetent and unqualified to hold even a simple press conference???
I believe organized athletic competitive premises is a good model to apply to politics and ideology.
 
We really need a facepalm button in the response menu.
It's amazing how the flock has done a complete one-eighty, from complaining that the Left is nothing but elitists to convincing themselves and each other that anyone who doesn't think just like they do is stupid and worthless.

Maybe that's part of the draw they have to their orange master. They tell themselves he's elite and special, and they figure they elevate themselves by attaching their personal value and self esteem to him.
 
Last edited:
I have read enough of the writings of Karl Marx to know that Kamala Harris is not a Marxist.

The Right uses "Marxist" the way the left uses "racist." In each case, the purpose is not to advance a serious conversation, but to suppress it.

Name calling is the lowest form of discourse.
Kamala is a modern Marxist in every sense of the word. If Karl Marx were alive today, he'd cast his vote for Harris.
 
HERE's HOW........

This is a 1985 interview of Yuri Bezmenov, a former Soviet KGB agent who defected to the West.
Interviewer: The Soviets use the phase, “ideological subversion”. What do they mean by that?


Bezmenov: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate overt and open. You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do, all the American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes and they can see. There’s no mystery. There’s nothing to do with espionage. I know espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic, it sells more deodorants through their advertising, probably. That’s why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of thrillers. But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all! According to my opinion, and the opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of the KGB, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality of every American to such as extent that in spite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community and their country.

It’s a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages, the first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which is required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of your enemy. In other words, Marxism / Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.

The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years, actually it’s over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is being done by Americans to Americans thanks to a lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter any more. A person who is demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him a concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he’s going to receive a kick in his fat bottom. When a military boot crushes his balls, then he will understand, but not before that. That’s the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

The next stage is destabilization. This time, the subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption, whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby, it doesn’t matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials, the economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see quite clearly that in some areas in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist / Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.

The next stage of course is crisis. It may take only up to 6 weeks to bring a country up to the verge of crisis. You can see them in Central America now.


And after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have a period of so called normalization. It may last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression born from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ’68, Comrade Brezhnev said, “Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized!” This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these smucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and a paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put a Big Brother government in Washington D.C. With benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of things, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not.
_________________________
It is clear that after a CENTURY of Marxist infiltration into our edu, media, and governance, the demented LEFT are ALL IN on this "fundamental change" as Obama put it.
This is NOT an exaggeration or hyperbole; it is real; it is here; it is NOW!
:evil:
 
I have read enough of the writings of Karl Marx to know that Kamala Harris is not a Marxist.

The Right uses "Marxist" the way the left uses "racist." In each case, the purpose is not to advance a serious conversation, but to suppress it.

Name calling is the lowest form of discourse.
Yep, and I sometimes suspect the Trumpsters are just purposely doing the same thing the Left does to them with "racism". Retribution, dontcha know.

They both have to change and pervert the actual definitions of those words so that they can try to attack and put their targets on the defensive. It's much easier than doing the heavy lifting of participating in honest discussion.

These folks clearly don't understand what Marxism and communism actually are, but they're fun and scary words to use, so they run with them.
 
Yep, and I sometimes suspect the Trumpsters are just purposely doing the same thing the Left does to them. Retribution, dontcha know.

They both have to change and pervert the actual definitions of those words so that they can try to attack and put their targets on the defensive.

These folks clearly don't understand what Marxism and communism actually are, but they're fun and scary words to use, so they run with them.

"But Obama himself acknowledges that he was drawn to socialists and even Marxists as a college student. He continued to associate with Marxists later in life, even choosing to launch his political career in the living room of a self-described Marxist, William Ayers, in 1995, when Obama was 34.

Obama's affinity for Marxists began when he attended Occidental College in Los Angeles.

"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully," the Democratic presidential candidate wrote in his memoir, "Dreams From My Father." "The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."
 
Sure seems that way. The more America has practiced preferential treatment, Affirmative Action, DEI whatever, the recipients of the benefits of being promoted on that which lacks merit and would not achieve without the preference seem to believe they are entitled to such preference on everything.

Exhibit A is Kamala, a completely meritless Marxist who thinks, because she is female and not white, she doesn't have to do press conferences...



It must be racist and sexist to ask Kamala to do what every single major Presidential nominee has done in modern history. The Marxist doctrine says that doesn't matter, only being Marxist and getting preferential treatment matters, and those who think Kamala should be held to the same standard will be branded as racist and sexist.

Is that really what we are about to do, to elect a "President" who is completely meritless and too incompetent and unqualified to hold even a simple press conference???
Marxism is the Bastard Child of the Filthy Whore of the French Revolution.

The French Revolution failed, miserably. Mostly because it was poorly led and had stupid ideas. Partly because.... Well; it was the French doing it.

We, the USA, showed them how to do it. We showed them how to throw off the chains of Manorialism and Feudalism. But, nope. The Froggies had to do their own thing, unfettered by reason and intelligence.

Then Nappy had to step in and slap them down. Good on him.

Later, Marx comes along and comes up with an even worse idea than the French Revolution. Which, trust me, was no easy task.

While Robespierre was gleefully chopping off the heads of anybody he thought was an enemy of the people (Citizens) that paled in comparison to the 100,000,000 (One Hundred Million) plus people that died at the hands of Marxists. The scummiest scumbag pieces of shit to ever infest the Earth.

Marxists are the same people that Robespierre used to murder people he didn't like. In fact, you think politically correct, woke speech-control is something new? Think again. The idiots running the French Revolution had people beheaded for not addressing others with the proper term -- "Citizen". If you addressed someone as 'Madam' or 'Monsieur' or 'Mademoiselle' you ran the risk of losing your head. Literally.

IMO, the French Revolution is the worst, most disgusting, most horrible conflagration in Human History. All the shit happening today, including dimocrap scum, wokie-woke bullshit, communism, socialism -- All of it, was birthed by the filthy French Whore of the Revolution.

word
 
I have read enough of the writings of Karl Marx to know that Kamala Harris is not a Marxist.

The Right uses "Marxist" the way the left uses "racist." In each case, the purpose is not to advance a serious conversation, but to suppress it.

Name calling is the lowest form of discourse.


What is the difference between Kamala and a Marxist?
 
"But Obama himself acknowledges that he was drawn to socialists and even Marxists as a college student. He continued to associate with Marxists later in life, even choosing to launch his political career in the living room of a self-described Marxist, William Ayers, in 1995, when Obama was 34.

Obama's affinity for Marxists began when he attended Occidental College in Los Angeles.

"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully," the Democratic presidential candidate wrote in his memoir, "Dreams From My Father." "The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."


And indeed homO hand picked the obese meritless Marxists in charge of BLM....

and what did they do?

They race baited and lied about George Floyd's death and all became millionaires....


 
And indeed homO hand picked the obese meritless Marxists in charge of BLM....

and what did they do?

They race baited and lied about George Floyd's death and all became millionaires....


"We're trained Marxists."
--- BLM
:evil:
 
Back
Top Bottom