Democrats vs Republicans

[Robert W]

We on the forum have proven that the Wall Street Article that I include the first paragraph of is accurate. Republicans never gloated over the death of, say, George Floyd yet Democrats were delisously pleased that Charlie Kirk was assassinated in cold blood. Kimmel got suspended by ABC and to this day still is by Sinclair and Nexstar. Where I live he was not live on TV.

Why don't democrats and republicans agree about Charlie Kirk?

Douglas Murray writes at City Journal that for years parts of the political left have been inhabiting “the gray zone of political violence: not fully condoning it, but not fully condemning it, either.” Mr. Murray adds:

Many commentators have pointed to the difference in responses between the killing of George Floyd and that of Charlie Kirk. Floyd’s death led to a summer of violence, burnings, and lootings, behavior often excused by Democratic lawmakers. Groups like Antifa shut down American cities night after night with minimal official condemnation in the summer of 2020. By contrast, Kirk’s death, so far, has led to dignified and mournful prayer meetings.

 

[White 6]

We on the forum have proven that the Wall Street Article that I include the first paragraph of is accurate. Republicans never gloated over the death of, say, George Floyd yet Democrats were delisously pleased that Charlie Kirk was assassinated in cold blood. Kimmel got suspended by ABC and to this day still is by Sinclair and Nexstar. Where I live he was not live on TV.

Why don't democrats and republicans agree about Charlie Kirk?

Douglas Murray writes at City Journal that for years parts of the political left have been inhabiting “the gray zone of political violence: not fully condoning it, but not fully condemning it, either.” Mr. Murray adds:

Is this another Anti-Free Speech, Anti-1st Amendment / Pro-fascist central control by government, pro-censorship, MAGA whining thread or am I reading it incorrectly?

 

[Votto]

Is this another Anti-Free Speech, Anti-1st Amendment / Pro-fascist central control by government, pro-censorship, MAGA whining thread or am I reading it incorrectly?

You are a moderator

Shut down the thread and ban him!

 

[Votto]

We on the forum have proven that the Wall Street Article that I include the first paragraph of is accurate. Republicans never gloated over the death of, say, George Floyd yet Democrats were delisously pleased that Charlie Kirk was assassinated in cold blood. Kimmel got suspended by ABC and to this day still is by Sinclair and Nexstar. Where I live he was not live on TV.

Why don't democrats and republicans agree about Charlie Kirk?

Douglas Murray writes at City Journal that for years parts of the political left have been inhabiting “the gray zone of political violence: not fully condoning it, but not fully condemning it, either.” Mr. Murray adds:

I noticed a difference when the Left tried to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh. After the event, not one democrat leader at the federal level came out to condemn the assassination attempt. In fact, they just acted like it never happened. You always knew there were loons on the radical fringe, but to see the leaders within the party act with indifference to their political violence? That was new.
I had never seen this type of indifference from a major political party for the attempted assassination of a major political figure in the federal government.

At that point, I knew things were radically different within the DNC. Now the inmates run the asylum

I used to think the two parties were more alike than different, but that is no longer the case. The DNC is far, far, worse.

 

[White 6]

You are a moderator

Shut down the thread and ban him!

Speaking as a member/poster, that would not be appropriate.

 

[Robert W]

Is this another Anti-Free Speech, Anti-1st Amendment / Pro-fascist central control by government, pro-censorship, MAGA whining thread or am I reading it incorrectly?

Fascism requires a nation have a king. It is about why don't the Democrats at least admit the dead man was a decent human being. If you see kindness as whining, this forum needs more of it.

 

[White 6]

Fascism requires a nation have a king. It is about why don't the Democrats at least admit the dead man was a decent human being. If you see kindness as whining, this forum needs more of it.

Reading is fundamental. You should try it, sometime. I see nothing in this accepted definition, requiring a king. It mostly just require as central control, power grabbing asshole.

Fascism​

Far-right authoritarian ideology and movement
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe. Fascism is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

 

[ChristisKing]

You are a moderator

Shut down the thread and ban him!

Why? It seems like he's saying that the democrats are all for free speech until it's against them! Then they want to silence all of us. Or am I mistaken? As I have some reading comprehension issues.

 

[Robert W]

Reading is fundamental. You should try it, sometime. I see nothing in this accepted definition, requiring a king. It mostly just require as central control, power grabbing asshole.

Fascism​

Far-right authoritarian ideology and movement
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe. Fascism is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

Fascism has actually been used by a country. It had a king and also a prime minister. The king fired Mussolini so the King is the vital link in Fascism.

I know this because I have been a long term history student. Today I teach this forum the components of fascism which includes a king in power.

There is no basis for equating fascism to republicans. It is a terribly weak argument to make.

 

[Robert W]

Reading is fundamental. You should try it, sometime. I see nothing in this accepted definition, requiring a king. It mostly just require as central control, power grabbing asshole.

Fascism​

Far-right authoritarian ideology and movement
Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe. Fascism is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

Democrats say that. Democrats are wrong.

Is Fascism Right or Left? | PragerU

Dinesh D'Souza debunks the myth linking GOP presidents to fascism, tracing its real roots to the left.

www.prageru.com

 

[White 6]

Democrats say that. Democrats are wrong.

Is Fascism Right or Left? | PragerU

Dinesh D'Souza debunks the myth linking GOP presidents to fascism, tracing its real roots to the left.

www.prageru.com

I quote a common dictionary, and you link a Right Wing Political commentator?
Loser!

 

[dudmuck]

I quote a common dictionary, and you link a Right Wing Political commentator?
Loser!
View attachment 1165847

 

[Robert W]

I quote a common dictionary, and you link a Right Wing Political commentator?
Loser!
View attachment 1165847

You do not want to call the man a well known accurate Republican.

What is clear to me is Democrats get that smug feeling by saying Fascist.
We all know who know history of one time it was the Government and it was in Italy. Hurting your feelings is not fascism. Fascism has a KING that rules and he appoints prime ministers. And fires them as the king of Italy fired Mussolini.

Teachers must learn to teach history properly. Somebody mentioned the King of Sweden but could have included the King of England. Can the kings fire the prime minister as Fascists could?

 

[whitehall]

It's been that way throughout the better part of the 20th century. The socialist left tried to convince kids who were stuck in the federal education system that the democrat party was the only way to go and the fix was in the mainstream media but somehow a republican managed to get elected president

 

[White 6]

You do not want to call the man a well known accurate Republican.

What is clear to me is Democrats get that smug feeling by saying Fascist.
We all know who know history of one time it was the Government and it was in Italy. Hurting your feelings is not fascism. Fascism has a KING that rules and he appoints prime ministers. And fires them as the king of Italy fired Mussolini.

Teachers must learn to teach history properly. Somebody mentioned the King of Sweden but could have included the King of England. Can the kings fire the prime minister as Fascists could?

He is described as a political commentator. Look it up, if you like.
As for you replying to a dictionary definition, do you really think a common source of all word meanings is a bad place to start? It is not like you really get to make up new definitions.

 

[Calypso Jones]