Democrats Need Big Cities to Win

[longknife]

At least, that is what this piece seems to claim. Only those crowded together in dire circumstances will believe in and vote for the failed policies espoused by progressives and liberals.


I don't know if this site has a political bias but it appears to approach this with a scientific approach. It says that as growth in suburbia was more than 2 million over those born in cities and suburbians tend to be conservative.


So, what do Dems plan to do about it? This presents some interesting ideas @ The Progressives War on Suburbia Newgeography.com

 

[Kosh]

At least, that is what this piece seems to claim. Only those crowded together in dire circumstances will believe in and vote for the failed policies espoused by progressives and liberals.


I don't know if this site has a political bias but it appears to approach this with a scientific approach. It says that as growth in suburbia was more than 2 million over those born in cities and suburbians tend to be conservative.


So, what do Dems plan to do about it? This presents some interesting ideas @ The Progressives War on Suburbia Newgeography.com

Many of your large cities are controlled by the far left. This is a good portion of the far left base.

Although I am not sure how much of that portion it is..

 

[hazlnut]

At least, that is what this piece seems to claim. Only those crowded together in dire circumstances will believe in and vote for the failed policies espoused by progressives and liberals.


I don't know if this site has a political bias but it appears to approach this with a scientific approach. It says that as growth in suburbia was more than 2 million over those born in cities and suburbians tend to be conservative.


So, what do Dems plan to do about it? This presents some interesting ideas @ The Progressives War on Suburbia Newgeography.com

This is dopey beyond words.

People who work in the "big cities" running the big corps, they live in the Suburbs.

You tea bags are so dopey.

 

[TheOldSchool]

At least, that is what this piece seems to claim. Only those crowded together in dire circumstances will believe in and vote for the failed policies espoused by progressives and liberals.


I don't know if this site has a political bias but it appears to approach this with a scientific approach. It says that as growth in suburbia was more than 2 million over those born in cities and suburbians tend to be conservative.


So, what do Dems plan to do about it? This presents some interesting ideas @ The Progressives War on Suburbia Newgeography.com

On the converse then republicans rely on disconnected yokels who don't know what they're voting for.

 

[Mr. H.]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

 

[rightwinger]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

 

[Mr. H.]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

Who do you suppose owns the land in those red counties? Who's children attend the schools? Who pays the property taxes and the inflated (but "temporary") state income tax?

Yet, the schools suffer thanks to the Blue bits. Property taxes are inflated thanks to the Blue bits. The "temporary" increase in the state income tax is sucked down the hideous vortex of the Blue bits.

 

[rightwinger]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

Who do you suppose owns the land in those red counties? Who's children attend the schools? Who pays the property taxes and the inflated (but "temporary") state income tax?

Yet, the schools suffer thanks to the Blue bits. Property taxes are inflated thanks to the Blue bits. The "temporary" increase in the state income tax is sucked down the hideous vortex of the Blue bits.

It is the PEOPLE of Illinois who vote not the farms

Why should a farmers vote count more than someone who lives in a city?

 

[JFK_USA]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

Who do you suppose owns the land in those red counties? Who's children attend the schools? Who pays the property taxes and the inflated (but "temporary") state income tax?

Yet, the schools suffer thanks to the Blue bits. Property taxes are inflated thanks to the Blue bits. The "temporary" increase in the state income tax is sucked down the hideous vortex of the Blue bits.

Yeah I mean why do PEOPLE get the right to vote and not land? Grrr.....

 

[Meathead]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

My God, you're brilliant. How did you figure that out?!

 

[rightwinger]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

My God, you're brilliant. How did you figure that out?!

See?

Even Meathead understands it. Why can't Republicans?

 

[BlackSand]

This is dopey beyond words.

People who work in the "big cities" running the big corps, they live in the Suburbs.

You tea bags are so dopey.

You bet they live in the suburbs ... Constantly growing in number as they escape the utter ruin of trying to live in crime infested hell-holes liberal administrations create.

The thing you didn't notice about what you mentioned is that they don't live where they work ... There is a reason for that.

.

 

[g5000]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

And yet the blue areas suck money from the red areas to survive.

This is why Democrats support the elimination of the Electoral College.

 

[rdean]

At least, that is what this piece seems to claim. Only those crowded together in dire circumstances will believe in and vote for the failed policies espoused by progressives and liberals.


I don't know if this site has a political bias but it appears to approach this with a scientific approach. It says that as growth in suburbia was more than 2 million over those born in cities and suburbians tend to be conservative.


So, what do Dems plan to do about it? This presents some interesting ideas @ The Progressives War on Suburbia Newgeography.com

Who do Republicans need?

 

[Meathead]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

My God, you're brilliant. How did you figure that out?!

See?

Even Meathead understands it. Why can't Republicans?

Do you mean the Chicago and St. Louis area has more people than the rural areas? Boy, it's a wonder Republicans can win in any state with big cities, huh?

 

[Meathead]

And yet the blue areas suck money from the red areas to survive.

This is why Democrats support the elimination of the Electoral College.

It's good to see you admit that the cities are parasitic. Rural and suburban America have to support the leeches in the inner cities. That's why the leeches vote Democrat.

 

[rdean]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

And yet the blue areas suck money from the red areas to survive.

This is why Democrats support the elimination of the Electoral College.

You know that's not true. Nationwide, Republicans survive on the tit of big government. Red States have the worst schools and the largest number of ignorant and are the most polluted. 150 years of conservative policies in Red States and those states are disasters. It's been proven again and again right here at the USMB.

 

[rdean]

And yet the blue areas suck money from the red areas to survive.

This is why Democrats support the elimination of the Electoral College.

It's good to see you admit that the cities are parasitic. Rural and suburban America have to support the leeches in the inner cities. That's why the leeches vote Democrat.

Imagine if the entire nation was country bumpkins
.

 

[Meathead]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

And yet the blue areas suck money from the red areas to survive.

This is why Democrats support the elimination of the Electoral College.

You know that's not true. Nationwide, Republicans survive on the tit of big government. Red States have the worst schools and the largest number of ignorant and are the most polluted. 150 years of conservative policies in Red States and those states are disasters. It's been proven again and again right here at the USMB.

Even the cities in red states suck. It is an urban phenomenon. Big American cities are such shit holes. Small wonder anyone who wants to be safe and their children educated get the hell out and leave it to minorities and Democrats.

 

[rdean]

Illinois is a Red State. What swings us year after year after year are metro Chicago, metro East St. Louis, and a tiny county full of crazies at the far southern tip of the state.

PEOPLE vote, not land

Those blue areas contain more PEOPLE than all those red areas

And yet the blue areas suck money from the red areas to survive.

This is why Democrats support the elimination of the Electoral College.

You know that's not true. Nationwide, Republicans survive on the tit of big government. Red States have the worst schools and the largest number of ignorant and are the most polluted. 150 years of conservative policies in Red States and those states are disasters. It's been proven again and again right here at the USMB.

Even the cities in red states suck. It is an urban phenomenon. Big American cities are such shit holes. Small wonder anyone who wants to be safe and their children educated get the hell out and leave it to minorities and Democrats.

People tend to flee to the cities dipshit.