Democrats…Forging positions and defending positions using micro percentiles. How does that make sense?

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
44,759
Reaction score
26,913
Points
2,615
Location
MEXIFORNIA
Do /should great nations tailor their politics, laws, and societal standards around the .0002%?
“Abortion must be easy to access because 7 year olds get raped and impregnated.”
“Illegals are great for America, I know six of them and they’re AWESOME people.”
“We must modify our core principles and moral order to accommodate trannies.”

I’m always fascinated by Libs when they defend a position using anomalies as their qualifiers.
Am I the only one?
 
Do /should great nations tailor their politics, laws, and societal standards around the .0002%?
“Abortion must be easy to access because 7 year olds get raped and impregnated.”
“Illegals are great for America, I know six of them and they’re AWESOME people.”
“We must modify our core principles and moral order to accommodate trannies.”

I’m always fascinated by Libs when they defend a position using anomalies as their qualifiers.
Am I the only one?
we are building a consensus. that is what people who are not led by gods announced do things.
 
Do /should great nations tailor their politics, laws, and societal standards around the .0002%?
“Abortion must be easy to access because 7 year olds get raped and impregnated.”
“Illegals are great for America, I know six of them and they’re AWESOME people.”
“We must modify our core principles and moral order to accommodate trannies.”

I’m always fascinated by Libs when they defend a position using anomalies as their qualifiers.
Am I the only one?
#MAGALIES
 
It IS a mandate.

NO it is not.

This is a mandate...

1730121015562.webp


This is not...

1730121048851.webp
 
Indeed. That's the biggest problem we have. We need government supported by broad consensus, not a partisan Punch n Judy show.

But neither side wants that, right now bi-partisanship is a bad word, agree with the other side even once and your own party will go after you.

This is the world we now live in
 
LOL - no, it's not. It's a very slim majority. Especially when things are bitterly divided. It means half the country will feel like something is being forced on them.

But neither side wants that, right now bi-partisanship is a bad word, agree with the other side even once and your own party will go after you.

This is the world we now live in
The very globalists who manufactured this new America comprised of too many people with too many differences are now the people complaining the most about the lack of bipartisanship.
A primary leftist feature; create a problem, then bitch about the problem, then pretend to want to or try to fix the problem.
Sorry fellas, it’s hard to take your grievances seriously…Were you really blindsided by this division, how did you not see it coming?
 
The very globalists who manufactured this new America comprised of too many people with too many differences are now the people complaining the most about the lack of bipartisanship.
A primary leftist feature; create a problem, then bitch about the problem, then pretend to want to or try to fix the problem.

Thanks for proving my post was correct.

Very kind of you! :beer:
 
I missed that…Which part did I prove correct?

this part "But neither side wants that, right now bi-partisanship is a bad word, agree with the other side even once and your own party will go after you."

Were you really blindsided by this division, how did you not see it coming?

Heck no, I have been talking about it for 20 plus years. The division is the product of the direct actions of both parties to remain in power and ensure "we the people" can never rise up against them as they have us too busy fighting each other over dumb shit that does not really matter
 
I’m always fascinated by Libs when they defend a position using anomalies as their qualifiers.
Am I the only one?
Always. It’s part of the emotional appeal

Democrats: This claim doesn’t feel good, so it’s wrong
Conservatives: this claim doesn’t produce good, so it’s wrong
 
They think 51% to 49% is a mandate.
… until they are the 49%, the it becomes they are the victim of oppression, and laws should be questioned.

And when they’re the 51%? They say you must respect all rule of law or you’re an evil person.

It happens at the snap of a finger.. like a schizophrenic.
 
"But neither side wants that, right now bi-partisanship is a bad word, agree with the other side even once and your own party will go after you."
“Wants that”? WTF….why would you think capitalists would WANT to compromise with socialists?
Why would sovereignty loving core Americans WANT to make deals with border hating globalists?
Heck no, I have been talking about it for 20 plus years. The division is the product of the direct actions of both parties to remain in power and ensure "we the people" can never rise up against them as they have us too busy fighting each other over dumb shit that does not really matter
You’re wrong, the “parties” aren’t the problem, the people are. The people had to come before the parties, the parties placate to the desires of the people.
You manufactured….
a socialist faction
a sovereignty hating faction
a American culture hating faction
a faggot faction
a chicks with dicks / weirdo faction
a degenerate faction
a desperate foreigners faction

You did that and YOU gave them all a voice / say at the table.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom