Democrats Call on News Networks to Balance Stories

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2004
Messages
70,230
Reaction score
10,859
Points
2,040
I almost put this in the humor thread........

By Ira Teinowitz
Top Democratic congressional leaders are complaining to network and cable television news executives that the networks are giving the party short shrift in national security stories.

"Until now, there has been a complete absence of balance in the news coverage of national security issues," House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. and Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in letters sent yesterday to top news executives at NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox News Channel and CNN.

The letters cited President Bush's primetime speech Monday night as an example, saying the president continues to inaccurately link 9/11 to the war in Iraq. They called on the networks to represent the Democrats' point of view.



"House and Senate leaders hold frequent press conferences and briefings on a wide variety of national security issues," the party leaders wrote. "Most of these receive scant coverage, even when offering specific alternatives to administration policies."

Citing media reports that the Bush administration plans to use a series of national-security speeches to help set the agenda for the November elections, the Democrats called on the networks to do a better job of providing a variety of views.

Some network news executives today said they already offer differing viewpoints.

"We couldn't agree more that fair coverage is warranted. That's precisely what we endeavor to do every day," said Jeffrey Schneider, senior VP-ABC News.
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=10739

:rotflmao:
 

CrimsonWhite

*****istrator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
7,978
Reaction score
1,778
Points
123
Location
Guntucky
The news is not a forum for expressing views. Is the opposition supposed to be allowed to formally respond to every Presidential speech? The answer is no. The news should not be opinionated. It should present facts and move on.
 

UnAmericanYOU

VIP Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
389
Reaction score
103
Points
78
The world HAS turned upside-down.

The news is not a forum for expressing views. Is the opposition supposed to be allowed to formally respond to every Presidential speech? The answer is no. The news should not be opinionated. It should present facts and move on.
Word. It's very possible for news to be unbiased, it should be reported, not interperted.

I'd consider this still a rumor, but it's inevitable: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/13/air-america-bankruptcy/

Time for the left to try to revive their old "Fairness Doctorine", history's history.
 

Bonnie

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
9,476
Reaction score
669
Points
48
Location
Wherever
The world HAS turned upside-down.



Word. It's very possible for news to be unbiased, it should be reported, not interperted.

I'd consider this still a rumor, but it's inevitable: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/13/air-america-bankruptcy/

Time for the left to try to revive their old "Fairness Doctorine", history's history.

Yes the Fairness doctrine rears it's head usually before any election, their slow this time around...But you'll see it again soon, especially before 2008. Air America has been going bankrupt almost since it's inception...Still waiting for that one to actually happen. Im guessing Sorros is secretly keeping it afloat.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top