Democrat/Google Cartel: Google letting Harris campaign edit headlines

Mr. Friscus

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
8,806
Reaction score
9,137
Points
2,138
Last edited:
Boy, this isn’t shady


The Democrats can’t win without their media Pravda and manipulation from big tech, but boy do they sure get it.
If Kamala could not purchase propaganda that could bolster her image then the 2024 POTUS election would be a one man contest.
 
I can tell you why this story is bullshit. Sure, the Harris people write all the headlines for Google, but they write the articles too. I wonder how much they pay for that privilege. Google is a whore.
 
I can tell you why this story is bullshit. Sure, the Harris people write all the headlines for Google, but they write the articles as well. Google is a whore.
Well Google already top-loaded their search results with the known-leftist media outlets when you look up something... usually when you search a top regarding Trump, Republicans, Democrats, Harris, etc... the first hits are CNN, MSNBC, ABC, AP, WaPo.

Just to test, I looked up "Donald Trump tips" on google (in reference to his position on taking off taxes from tips that Harris stole from him).. here's the order:

1. CNN
2. WaPo
3. NPR
4. Bergen
5. NBC
6. USAToday
7. ABC
8. CBS
9. Forbes
10. LA Times

All Top 10 are left-leaning media institutions. No FOX, no NY Post, no Dailywire...
 
Well Google already top-loaded their search results with the known-leftist media outlets when you look up something... usually when you search a top regarding Trump, Republicans, Democrats, Harris, etc... the first hits are CNN, MSNBC, ABC, AP, WaPo.

Just to test, I looked up "Donald Trump tips" on google (in reference to his position on taking off taxes from tips that Harris stole from him).. here's the order:

1. CNN
2. WaPo
3. NPR
4. Bergen
5. NBC
6. USAToday
7. ABC
8. CBS
9. Forbes
10. LA Times

All Top 10 are left-leaning media institutions. No FOX, no NY Post, no Dailywire...
So the rule of thumb is 'if you want anything that resembles fact, you need to start your search on about page 3'. MAGA
 
So the rule of thumb is 'if you want anything that resembles fact, you need to start your search on about page 3'. MAGA
Well.. yes. That's why the media is frustrating, because they are mostly unapologicetically card-carrying Democrats until professionally pressed, and then they gaslight about how they are above the activism they display by the boatloads to assist and protect the candidate they, and their organization, supports.

If the media was actually semi-balanced, the GOP and Conservatism would win every presidential election. The media is a Democrat institution that bottlenecks narratives and public perception as they desire. The public is constantly fed lies, exaggerations, etc. about right-wing candidates while being tamed about blemishes of left-wing candidates.
 
Off the charts, global desperation against nationalism, among other things.
 
Off the charts, global desperation against nationalism, among other things.
I would imagine we are going to continue to see the globalist Democrat/Euro coalition work together by taking whatever short-cut or immoral act is necessary to snuff out the people they have determined are "wrong" or "evil".

To quote Mace Windu when finding out Palpatine was a Dark Sith.. "He's too dangerous to be left alive"... he threw his morals aside to get the guy that is just that bad. And if you gaslight yourself to think that a person who merely disagrees with you on policy and culture is Hitler, you can do whatever you want to them and pat yourself on the back while doing it.
 
Boy, this isn’t shady


The Democrats can’t win without their media Pravda and manipulation from big tech, but boy do they sure get it.
The link cited...

"The Harris campaign has reportedly bought Google ads featuring manipulated news stories featuring a pro-Kamala spin in the headline and description."

They paid for the ads.

There is nothing shady about it...the OP is correct.
 
The link cited...

"The Harris campaign has reportedly bought Google ads featuring manipulated news stories featuring a pro-Kamala spin in the headline and description."

They paid for the ads.

There is nothing shady about it...the OP is correct.
They paid to edit headlines.

Yes. That's shady AF

Trump makes cliche political ads about himself. Harris manipulates headlines to fool the populace.
 
Not happening. They bought advertisements. They’re not manipulating headlines.
The presentation on the search page edits the headlines and props them to the top. It's not an advertisment, It's clearly manipulation, even the leftist outlets have spoken up about how their initial headlines were altered without their consent (not that they'll overall mind supporting Harris).
 
15th post
Google isn’t letting the Harris campaign do anything. They pay for advertising on Google and..gee willikers..put together ads that show them in the best light.

The OP and the author of the op are flat out lying.
 
Google isn’t letting the Harris campaign do anything. They pay for advertising on Google and..gee willikers..put together ads that show them in the best light.

The OP and the author of the op are flat out lying.
They're sponsored ads at the top of a Google search. Sponsored ads are paid ads. Companies have taken it one step further by changing news headlines for their ads. It's a relatively new and common practice, and it's an issue in journalism.

Yes, sophisticated users know the difference between sponsored ads and regular search results, but rubes don't know. Advertisers count on that unsophisticated audience.
 
Why are democrats so much better at media than republicans?
Manipulating people? I’m not sure, but it’s not a flex to try to admit you need manipulation to have success in politics
 
Back
Top Bottom