Democracy only works in Countries that are racially homogenous or at least predominantly homogenous.

Persuader

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Messages
5,458
Reaction score
5,271
Points
1,938
Now how many countries are like that....only Japan comes to mind...or perhaps Russia as being predominantly Caucasian....yet they have a dictatorship....thus there is no guarantee that even a homogenous nation will be or can be democratic in nature.

Thus if America is to survive much longer....we must transition into something other than a Republic.

Perhaps a monarchy? A monarchy though if it is to be desirable must have a King that is devoted to his people.
I think Trump would be a good King...but he is getting old....though I think Baron would be a great King also.

Irregardless....America is falling apart....we functioned pretty good until the sixties....when the nation as a whole began its descent into hell.
 
The problem with monarchy is even if you had a good king, the odds of getting a succession of good kings is basically zero. Sooner or later you'll have a lunatic with unlimited power. In a world with nukes I'll just never be comfortable with that dynamic.
 
Now how many countries are like that....only Japan comes to mind...or perhaps Russia as being predominantly Caucasian....yet they have a dictatorship....thus there is no guarantee that even a homogenous nation will be or can be democratic in nature.

Thus if America is to survive much longer....we must transition into something other than a Republic.

Perhaps a monarchy? A monarchy though if it is to be desirable must have a King that is devoted to his people.
I think Trump would be a good King...but he is getting old....though I think Baron would be a great King also.

Irregardless....America is falling apart....we functioned pretty good until the sixties....when the nation as a whole began its descent into hell.
I believe you are correct
 
The illegals invading the country do not GAF about the Constitution or American cultural norms.
 
Now how many countries are like that....only Japan comes to mind...or perhaps Russia as being predominantly Caucasian....yet they have a dictatorship....thus there is no guarantee that even a homogenous nation will be or can be democratic in nature.

Thus if America is to survive much longer....we must transition into something other than a Republic.

Perhaps a monarchy? A monarchy though if it is to be desirable must have a King that is devoted to his people.
I think Trump would be a good King...but he is getting old....though I think Baron would be a great King also.

Irregardless....America is falling apart....we functioned pretty good until the sixties....when the nation as a whole began its descent into hell.
Where there is anything like an equal distribution of wealth—that is to
say, where there is general patriotism, virtue, and intelligence—the
more democratic the government the better it will be; but where there
is gross inequality in the distribution of wealth, the more democratic
the government the worse it will be; for, while rotten democracy
may not in itself be worse than rotten autocracy, its effects upon
national character will be worse. To give the suffrage to tramps, to
paupers, to men to whom the chance to labor is a boon, to men who must
beg, or steal, or starve, is to invoke destruction. To put political
power in the hands of men embittered and degraded by poverty is to tie
firebrands to foxes and turn them loose amid the standing corn; it
is to put out the eyes of a Samson and to twine his arms around the

pillars of national life.

 
Last edited:
Now how many countries are like that....only [sic] Japan comes to mind...or perhaps Russia as being predominantly Caucasian....yet they have a dictatorship....thus [sic] there is no guarantee that even [sic] a homogenous nation will be or can be democratic in nature.

Thus [sic] if America is to survive much longer....we [sic] must [sic] transition into something other than a Republic.

Perhaps a monarchy? A monarchy though if it is to be desirable [sic] must have a King that is devoted to his people.
I think Trump would be a good King [sic]...but he is getting old....though [sic] I think Baron would be a great King also.

Irregardless [sic]....America [sic] is falling apart....we [sic] functioned pretty [sic] good until the sixties....when [sic] the nation as a whole began its descent into hell.
The OP is stupid on oh so many levels.
 
The OP is stupid on oh so many levels.
Yes, but, the OP does have a point. I quoted Henry George from Progress and Poverty. At this point, a "King", granted through heredity, is preferable to our democracy. I turn to Henry George again,

Even the accidents of hereditary succession or of selection by lot, the
plan of some of the ancient republics, may sometimes place the wise
and just in power; but in a corrupt democracy the tendency is always
to give power to the worst. Honesty and patriotism are weighted, and
unscrupulousness commands success. The best gravitate to the bottom,
the worst float to the top, and the vile will only be ousted by the
viler. While as national character must gradually assimilate to the
qualities that win power, and consequently respect, that demoralization
of opinion goes on which in the long panorama of history we may see
over and over again.

I would never expect you to read the entire book. Although I have an original edition, one of my most prized possessions. Picked it up at a Salvation Army thrift store for a quarter, worth thousands. But really do yourself a favor and read the chapter, "How Modern Civilization May Decline". It was written in 1879. It is scary accurate.

And just for shits and giggles, hit Wiki up, Georgism. Look at the list of Georgist. Milton Friedman, William Buckley, Winston Churchill, Joseph Stiglitz, Albert Einstein. I mean Henry George and Poverty and Progress is the deep buried secret that could save this nation. Were it up to me, it would be required reading, at least the chapter I mentioned, for every high school student in America. A much better read than Atlas Shrugged.
 
But forms are nothing when substance has gone, and the forms of popular
government are those from which the substance of freedom may most
easily go. Extremes meet, and a government of universal suffrage and
theoretical equality may, under conditions which impel the change,
most readily become a despotism. For there despotism advances in the
name and with the might of the people. The single source of power once
secured, everything is secured. There is no unfranchised class to
whom appeal may be made, no privileged orders who in defending their
own rights may defend those of all. No bulwark remains to stay the
flood, no eminence to rise above it. They were belted barons led by a
mitered archbishop who curbed the Plantagenet with Magna Charta; it
was the middle classes who broke the pride of the Stuarts; but a mere
aristocracy of wealth will never struggle while it can hope to bribe a
tyrant.
 
Now how many countries are like that....only Japan comes to mind...or perhaps Russia as being predominantly Caucasian....yet they have a dictatorship....thus there is no guarantee that even a homogenous nation will be or can be democratic in nature.

Thus if America is to survive much longer....we must transition into something other than a Republic.

Perhaps a monarchy? A monarchy though if it is to be desirable must have a King that is devoted to his people.
I think Trump would be a good King...but he is getting old....though I think Baron would be a great King also.

Irregardless....America is falling apart....we functioned pretty good until the sixties....when the nation as a whole began its descent into hell.
The nation was a hole before the 60's. America wasn't functioning well. But this is the tall tale white racists tell themselves.
 
The OP is stupid on oh so many levels.
Not wrong. Japanese value their history and culture. To continue that tradition, Japanese must continue to regulate immigration. US allows all kinds with many have no regard for this country's history except for where are my freebies. East Asia will lead this world decades from now and guess what? They will accomplish that without drenching themselves in DEI.
 
15th post
Seriously, I've read more than you ever will.
Great. you know everything. So indicative of someone that teaches. No, I highly doubt you have read more than me. To make that claim is so ridiculous. I miss when the boys were young. I held class here, with them and the neighborhood kids. Mostly, to correct teachers. So comical, a teacher would spout some nonsense, and next day, someone from the neighborhood would show up, with a book from my library, which is rather extensive thank you very much, and correct the teacher.

You need to learn respect. Henry George was way ahead of his time. If you don't have the intellectual curiosity to examine that, then quite honestly, you need to leave your profession. You have no business teaching monkeys, let alone real individuals. People complain about our education system. The problem is obvious. The problem is YOU.
 
Not wrong. Japanese value their history and culture. To continue that tradition, Japanese must continue to regulate immigration. US let's in all kinds with many have no regard for this country's history except for where are my freebies. East Asia will lead this world decades from now and guess what what? They will accomplish that without drenching themselves in DEI.
America is a country created by immigrants. Whites totally disrespected the cultures that were already here and now labor under a delusion that America is a white country. East Asia is more diverse than America.
 
The nation was a hole before the 60's. America wasn't functioning well. But this is the tall tale white racists tell themselves.
You smear other nations from your spouts. East Asia is made for the system we live in. They were just not first when it became ingrained and were a couple of centuries behind due to their caste systems.
 

Democracy only works in Countries that are racially homogenous or at least predominantly homogenous.​

Whatever you are on -- please share. You do know that failed democracies in some countries had 100% racially homogenous populations and not predominantly homogenous populations?​

 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
Back
Top Bottom