Dem introduces bills to eliminate electoral college, stop presidents from pardoning themselves

[Asclepias]

Yeah he did moron...

"The population of blue states are to ******* stupid... "

He used the wrong word. Should have been "too". Its not incorrect spelling it was an incorrect word.

No stupid. He spelled "too" in correctly.

You're stupid. He used the wrong word. You do realize that "to" and "too" have different meanings, right?

So youre saying he is so stupid he was using the wrong word instead of spelling the correct word incorrectly? Does he know you are speaking for him? Are you his lover or something?

You jealous? Not his lover. You're free to hit on him. Not saying he is stupid. Saying he used the wrong word.

If he used the wrong word then that means he is more illiterate than you are. You aren't really helping him out. I know it was that he spelled the word incorrectly. Bear is smarter than you are.

 

[g5000]

Barack Obama still holds the record for most popular votes received in the history of the country. 69,498,516 in 2008.

He even got more in 2012 than Trump or Clinton in 2016.

What does that mean tardo?

Us population 1976 was 216 million

Today 330 million

.

It means that even though the voting population has grown since 2008, Trump could not even get close to what Obama got in 2008.

All caught up now, dumbass?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Because the population is affected, not some entity on paper..... right?

Right. Senators are federal representatives of states. You want more reps you attract more people to your state.

Want more electoral votes, attract more people to your state. Most of the Democratic leaning states are losing electoral votes because they are driving away the population with their poor economic policies.

I dont want more electoral votes. I want popular vote.

You can want it. You're not going to get it.

That doesnt change the point. The EC shouldnt decide against what the population wants

The US would cease to be..

 

[DandyDonovan]

In doing so they prove they are too stupid to understand why the Electoral College was established to begin with and why it is so important today - all they understand is 'Hillary lost because of the Electoral College'....

Which brings me to my 2nd point:

HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT LOSE BECAUSE OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

Without having to address her long history of scandal / sexual misconduct enabling / abandoning Americans to needlessly die / selling Russia 20% of the US' uranium, compromising our national security / etc.... Hillary Clinton should NEVER have been in the election to begin with as she failed to WIN her own party's nomination. The election should have been Sanders versus Trump.

House Dems move to eliminate Electoral College, limit presidential pardon power and more in first days back

Its always been about party power and all they want is the ability for California and New York State to exclusively control our elections while omitting all the other states having any say. This is tantamount to TREASON and trying to usurp and overthrow the government and on those grounds alone, Trump ought to have Pelosi and the rest driving this all arrested right now and charged with treason and high crimes against the United States And thrown in federal prison. The Democrats are children in a glass house carrying rocks driving this country into a constitutional meltdown.

Just stop, advocating changing the COTUS is NOT treason. The ******* document is designed to be changed.

Leave that kind of nonsense to the liberal bed wetters.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

First of all, you can't get rid of the electoral college.
It was the contract when the states joined, so it would deliberate criminal fraud to try to change it now, unless you dissolved the country and let the states decide all over again is they wanted to join the new country or not?

Second is that the purpose of the electoral college has not gone way.
It was to stop large urban centers, with their concentration of wealth, corruption, and population, from being able to infringe upon the rights of the rural minorities.

Oh ******* BULLSHIT. "Large urban centers, with their concentration of wealth, corruption, and population" didn't even exist at the time.

Really? New York City didn't exist? Philadelphia didn't exist? Boston? Baltimore? They just sprouted out of thin air afterwards?

 

[Asclepias]

Right. Senators are federal representatives of states. You want more reps you attract more people to your state.

Want more electoral votes, attract more people to your state. Most of the Democratic leaning states are losing electoral votes because they are driving away the population with their poor economic policies.

I dont want more electoral votes. I want popular vote.

You can want it. You're not going to get it.

That doesnt change the point. The EC shouldnt decide against what the population wants

The US would cease to be..

Why would it cease to be? Do you mean states wont exist anymore?

BTW Azzgod spoke for you and said instead of spelling "too" incorrectly you were even worse off and used "to" on purpose even when it should have been "too". Is he correct?

 

[blackhawk]

This will go nowhere nice to see the Democrats focusing on the things most important to the American people right out of the gate though.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Barack Obama still holds the record for most popular votes received in the history of the country. 69,498,516 in 2008.

He even got more in 2012 than Trump or Clinton in 2016.

What does that mean tardo?

Us population 1976 was 216 million

Today 330 million

.

It means that even though the voting population has grown since 2008, Trump could not even get close to what Obama got in 2008.

All caught up now, dumbass?

And that means what again you moron?

That obozo was a prom king???


.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Because the population is affected, not some entity on paper..... right?

Right. Senators are federal representatives of states. You want more reps you attract more people to your state.

Want more electoral votes, attract more people to your state. Most of the Democratic leaning states are losing electoral votes because they are driving away the population with their poor economic policies.

I dont want more electoral votes. I want popular vote.

You can want it. You're not going to get it.

That doesnt change the point. The EC shouldnt decide against what the population wants

The population has the House of Representatives to decide what the population wants. It's had that for 230 years. The president isn't a monarch and as we've seen time and time again doesn't always get what he wants.

 

[ph3iron]

In doing so they prove they are too stupid to understand why the Electoral College was established to begin with and why it is so important today - all they understand is 'Hillary lost because of the Electoral College'....

Which brings me to my 2nd point:

HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT LOSE BECAUSE OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

Without having to address her long history of scandal / sexual misconduct enabling / abandoning Americans to needlessly die / selling Russia 20% of the US' uranium, compromising our national security / etc.... Hillary Clinton should NEVER have been in the election to begin with as she failed to WIN her own party's nomination. The election should have been Sanders versus Trump.

House Dems move to eliminate Electoral College, limit presidential pardon power and more in first days back

Its always been about party power and all they want is the ability for California and New York State to exclusively control our elections while omitting all the other states having any say. This is tantamount to TREASON and trying to usurp and overthrow the government and on those grounds alone, Trump ought to have Pelosi and the rest driving this all arrested right now and charged with treason and high crimes against the United States And thrown in federal prison. The Democrats are children in a glass house carrying rocks driving this country into a constitutional meltdown.

I thought it was one person, one vote.
Move to cal, my daughter started a $150MM company there but it may be too much for you.
The orange blob accusing people? A guy where his name means to be stiffed?
Hilarious

 

[g5000]

Barack Obama still holds the record for most popular votes received in the history of the country. 69,498,516 in 2008.

He even got more in 2012 than Trump or Clinton in 2016.

What does that mean tardo?

Us population 1976 was 216 million

Today 330 million

.

It means that even though the voting population has grown since 2008, Trump could not even get close to what Obama got in 2008.

All caught up now, dumbass?

And that means what again you moron?

That obozo was a prom king???


.

To a guy who obsesses over crowd size, it means everything. Especially since it was Obama.

 

[Meathead]

​

Oh noes! It's "we the people"!!

RUN!!

Who did those grey areas vote for?

 

[Asclepias]

Right. Senators are federal representatives of states. You want more reps you attract more people to your state.

Want more electoral votes, attract more people to your state. Most of the Democratic leaning states are losing electoral votes because they are driving away the population with their poor economic policies.

I dont want more electoral votes. I want popular vote.

You can want it. You're not going to get it.

That doesnt change the point. The EC shouldnt decide against what the population wants

The population has the House of Representatives to decide what the population wants. It's had that for 230 years. The president isn't a monarch and as we've seen time and time again doesn't always get what he wants.

The HOR doesnt decide the presidency unless the EC is deadlocked.

 

[Polishprince]

The EC is certainly obsolete; but the only people I know who want the President to maintain pardon power for himself, family and associates are alt-right Trump sheep who want white-collar crime legalized.

Also, Hillary did not sell Russia 20% of U.S. uranium. If you somehow still believe that, there is no point in engaging you about anything.

The Electoral College assures that all of the states have some say in determining their President. Why give all the power to California and New York? It spreads it out, and means that candidates have to appeal to many states.

Further, abolishing the electoral college would make the election riggable and fixable.

One candidate could be leading by millions of votes, and suddenly, one side finds a couple of box cars packed with millions of votes from LA or New York, and that would be that.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Want more electoral votes, attract more people to your state. Most of the Democratic leaning states are losing electoral votes because they are driving away the population with their poor economic policies.

I dont want more electoral votes. I want popular vote.

You can want it. You're not going to get it.

That doesnt change the point. The EC shouldnt decide against what the population wants

The population has the House of Representatives to decide what the population wants. It's had that for 230 years. The president isn't a monarch and as we've seen time and time again doesn't always get what he wants.

The HOR doesnt decide the presidency unless the EC is deadlocked.

I'm aware of that. What does that have to do with what I said?

 

[ph3iron]

The EC is certainly obsolete; but the only people I know who want the President to maintain pardon power for himself, family and associates are alt-right Trump sheep who want white-collar crime legalized.

Also, Hillary did not sell Russia 20% of U.S. uranium. If you somehow still believe that, there is no point in engaging you about anything.

The Electoral College assures that all of the states have some say in determining their President. Why give all the power to California and New York? It spreads it out, and means that candidates have to appeal to many states.

Further, abolishing the electoral college would make the election riggable and fixable.

One candidate could be leading by millions of votes, and suddenly, one side finds a couple of box cars packed with millions of votes from LA or New York, and that would be that.

How does the ROW manage?

 

[kyzr]

Going forward if the dems want to accomplish anything, it will be re-naming post offices <g>

 

[Asclepias]

I dont want more electoral votes. I want popular vote.

You can want it. You're not going to get it.

That doesnt change the point. The EC shouldnt decide against what the population wants

The population has the House of Representatives to decide what the population wants. It's had that for 230 years. The president isn't a monarch and as we've seen time and time again doesn't always get what he wants.

The HOR doesnt decide the presidency unless the EC is deadlocked.

I'm aware of that. What does that have to do with what I said?

"The population has the House of Representatives to decide what the population wants."

Well for example the population wanted crooked Hillary. They got retarded Drumpf instead. The HOR had zip to do with it.

 

[Pogo]

First of all, you can't get rid of the electoral college.
It was the contract when the states joined, so it would deliberate criminal fraud to try to change it now, unless you dissolved the country and let the states decide all over again is they wanted to join the new country or not?

Second is that the purpose of the electoral college has not gone way.
It was to stop large urban centers, with their concentration of wealth, corruption, and population, from being able to infringe upon the rights of the rural minorities.

Oh ******* BULLSHIT. "Large urban centers, with their concentration of wealth, corruption, and population" didn't even exist at the time.

Really? New York City didn't exist? Philadelphia didn't exist? Boston? Baltimore? They just sprouted out of thin air afterwards?

They existed but certainly were not "large urban centers with their concentration of wealth, corruption and population".
Most Americans lived in the sticks.

The poster tried to float a modern internet myth without looking up his history. In actual fact the EC was put in place partly to filter an uninformed population much of which lived what we would consider continents away from the Capitol, and partly to award extra "Slave Power" to the slaveholding states, without which the Constitution wasn't going to get ratified.

 

[Uncensored2008]

In doing so they prove they are too stupid to understand why the Electoral College was established to begin with and why it is so important today - all they understand is 'Hillary lost because of the Electoral College'....

Which brings me to my 2nd point:

HILLARY CLINTON DID NOT LOSE BECAUSE OF THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

Without having to address her long history of scandal / sexual misconduct enabling / abandoning Americans to needlessly die / selling Russia 20% of the US' uranium, compromising our national security / etc.... Hillary Clinton should NEVER have been in the election to begin with as she failed to WIN her own party's nomination. The election should have been Sanders versus Trump.



House Dems move to eliminate Electoral College, limit presidential pardon power and more in first days back

The circus has come to town...