Abishai100
VIP Member
- Sep 22, 2013
- 4,970
- 252
- 85
Depictions of darkness and evil in art, comic books, literature, music, and movies signify a social evaluation of anti-social behaviors, hysteria, anarchy, mischief, and enigma.
We think of darkness in terms of what we can see and understand (and predict) and the shadow world of what we can not see or predict. Darkness is a 'face' of the reality of asburdism and the unnatural existence of chaotic beings and ideas (such as the Jabberwocky).
We should not tempt fate regarding danger and the idea of 'experimenting' with courage, so darkness is usually described as something that should be avoided, if not completely ignored.
There seems to be (IMO) to sides to darkness --- malice and mischief.
Malice describes the breach in trust between people, while mischief signifies a turbulence in the analysis of social norm reliability. Murderers exhibit malice, while thieves may exhibit mischief, even though they both sin and are therefore 'playing' with darkness...
I'm interested in coordinating popular art with ideas in religious texts (mostly the Christian Bible) regarding the 'appearance' of darkness rather than the pure presence of darkness (since appearance is more 'tangible' when darkness is simply too enigmatic to evaluate the quality of its presence).
Maybe the best way to evaluate darkness is through the lens of personal experience and self-reflection, which is why the Book of Job is so helpful and why I like making 'sculptured Mad Libs' using Job-esque mock-dialogues about 'paranoia Golems.'
What do you think is Job's final analysis of darkness?
====
JOB: Satan frustrated me when he suggested that human beings are hypnotized by 'dolls.'
GOD: Dolls are figurines used to praise the symmetry and charm of the human body, so why are you worried?
JOB: Am I too 'child-like' in my 'idealistic' fascination with inanimate objects which resemble/praise life?
GOD: There's nothing wrong with praising life...
JOB: Why not obsess over a fancy house or dress? Why a doll?
GOD: A doll can be a totem of comfort or a temptation for vanity --- pure and simple.
JOB: I must want to hold a 'Golem' of life in my hands (literally).
GOD: That's why we have the Christian crucifix...
JOB: What's the difference then between a doll and a water-gun from Toys 'R Us?
GOD: A doll resembles a full person, while a toy-gun represents one 'face' of human activity.
JOB: Why do some dollmakers make figurines of strange-looking humans?
GOD: People are curious about the 'appearance' of ugliness.
JOB: Is humanity seeking to be optimistic about the 'presence' of chaos?
GOD: Yes, and it's why we celebrate films such as Godzilla and Robots.
JOB: I must want to 'wrestle' with darkness.
GOD: You're curious about your own strength and potential but careless about your limits...
JOB: I'm somewhat vain about freedom and education.
GOD: Negotiating freedom and education is the true challenge of prudent and beneficial governance.
====
We think of darkness in terms of what we can see and understand (and predict) and the shadow world of what we can not see or predict. Darkness is a 'face' of the reality of asburdism and the unnatural existence of chaotic beings and ideas (such as the Jabberwocky).
We should not tempt fate regarding danger and the idea of 'experimenting' with courage, so darkness is usually described as something that should be avoided, if not completely ignored.
There seems to be (IMO) to sides to darkness --- malice and mischief.
Malice describes the breach in trust between people, while mischief signifies a turbulence in the analysis of social norm reliability. Murderers exhibit malice, while thieves may exhibit mischief, even though they both sin and are therefore 'playing' with darkness...
I'm interested in coordinating popular art with ideas in religious texts (mostly the Christian Bible) regarding the 'appearance' of darkness rather than the pure presence of darkness (since appearance is more 'tangible' when darkness is simply too enigmatic to evaluate the quality of its presence).
Maybe the best way to evaluate darkness is through the lens of personal experience and self-reflection, which is why the Book of Job is so helpful and why I like making 'sculptured Mad Libs' using Job-esque mock-dialogues about 'paranoia Golems.'
What do you think is Job's final analysis of darkness?
====
JOB: Satan frustrated me when he suggested that human beings are hypnotized by 'dolls.'
GOD: Dolls are figurines used to praise the symmetry and charm of the human body, so why are you worried?
JOB: Am I too 'child-like' in my 'idealistic' fascination with inanimate objects which resemble/praise life?
GOD: There's nothing wrong with praising life...
JOB: Why not obsess over a fancy house or dress? Why a doll?
GOD: A doll can be a totem of comfort or a temptation for vanity --- pure and simple.
JOB: I must want to hold a 'Golem' of life in my hands (literally).
GOD: That's why we have the Christian crucifix...
JOB: What's the difference then between a doll and a water-gun from Toys 'R Us?
GOD: A doll resembles a full person, while a toy-gun represents one 'face' of human activity.
JOB: Why do some dollmakers make figurines of strange-looking humans?
GOD: People are curious about the 'appearance' of ugliness.
JOB: Is humanity seeking to be optimistic about the 'presence' of chaos?
GOD: Yes, and it's why we celebrate films such as Godzilla and Robots.
JOB: I must want to 'wrestle' with darkness.
GOD: You're curious about your own strength and potential but careless about your limits...
JOB: I'm somewhat vain about freedom and education.
GOD: Negotiating freedom and education is the true challenge of prudent and beneficial governance.
====