- Dec 8, 2014
- Reaction score
Your reading comprehension sucks, and you are allergic to facts and evidence that conflict with your preordained opinions.No I did not. Probably because my reading comprehension doesn't suck and I'm not allergic to facts and evidence that conflict with my pre-ordained opinions...That was a ton of verbiage, none of which backed your claim that ""The FBI has admitted several times the certainty that multiple foreign powers had access to the stupid ass server."
Did you notice that?
If you have "hostile actors" gaining access to Clinton Associates who were in regular connection to the Clinton server and assume that the hackers are not dense and stupid -- it's REQUIRED that you assume these same "hostile actors" would FLOCK to the Clinton server.. Because that was the ultimate hacking prize.. [...]
Were it any different, you'd have realized (from your own link)...
Moreover, for truly sensitive data, the State Department does not use its own networks at all. It quietly uses a network run by one of the major intelligence agencies, according to officials familiar with the system.
... and you'd also have realized why it is that just a minuscule portion of the emails on Clinton's "stupid ass server" contained (retroactively) classified information, and, once there, you'd have realized that this server never ever came close to being "the ultimate hacking prize." That's just hyperventilation feeding into the "emails! EMAILS!! EMAILS!!!" hysteria. Which, of course, always was, and still is, just a very goofy way to keep the deplorables agitated and distracted.