Actually he canted, recanted, and then canted again. I'm not sure there is even a term for changing your story that many times.
AS you know, but many fans of voter suppression my not know, voting locations in Philadelphia and other spots were obscured from view by democrats, so observers could not witness what was going on.
HIs video (see facebook project veritas) where he says he did recant his story, but claims he was coerced by the OIG into recanting.
The pol workers invalidated them whether they were originally legitimate or not. They can't be counted. There's no chain of custody.
Link?
Depending on state laws, that in itself may be a crime.
Actually we do not know. As the media is not trustworthy.
LOLA House committee says he signed a second affidavit recanting his first affidavit.He said he never recanted.He's no longer a whistleblower once he recanted his claims.Here's an article stating he signed a second affidavit...Did you read the article.You know that lying in a video is not a crime. Lying to the USPS Postal Inspectors is a felony.
Yes. I looked to see if it mentioned whether he filed a sworn affidavit, and I didn't see mention of one.
Pa. postal whistleblower Richard Hopkins placed on leave without pay
The Pennsylvania postal whistleblower has been taken off the job without pay after alleging ballot-tampering at the Erie Post Office.www.washingtontimes.com
The House Oversight Committee said Tuesday that Mr. Hopkins had executed another affidavit recanting his allegations, but he said afterward he was pressured into signing the document by investigators with the USPS Office of Inspector General.
Oh, so it's legal to retaliate against whistle blowers?
Now he's claiming he was coerced into signing the second one.
I am going by what I read. This is case in point. So many media sources saying disparate narratives that it is difficult to gauge who is or isn't telling the truth. Why is it so hard for a dumbass like you to understand that? You're case in point of morons who are allowed to vote.
View attachment 414821
They're allowed to use binoculars or other magnifying optics in order to see from 6 feet away.
LOLA House committee says he signed a second affidavit recanting his first affidavit.He said he never recanted.He's no longer a whistleblower once he recanted his claims.Here's an article stating he signed a second affidavit...Did you read the article.You know that lying in a video is not a crime. Lying to the USPS Postal Inspectors is a felony.
Yes. I looked to see if it mentioned whether he filed a sworn affidavit, and I didn't see mention of one.
Pa. postal whistleblower Richard Hopkins placed on leave without pay
The Pennsylvania postal whistleblower has been taken off the job without pay after alleging ballot-tampering at the Erie Post Office.The House Oversight Committee said Tuesday that Mr. Hopkins had executed another affidavit recanting his allegations, but he said afterward he was pressured into signing the document by investigators with the USPS Office of Inspector General.
Oh, so it's legal to retaliate against whistle blowers?
Now he's claiming he was coerced into signing the second one.
I am going by what I read. This is case in point. So many media sources saying disparate narratives that it is difficult to gauge who is or isn't telling the truth. Why is it so hard for a dumbass like you to understand that? You're case in point of morons who are allowed to vote.
View attachment 414821
ShortBus, here's a tweet by the House Committee saying he recanted his affidavit...
And Trump never claimed there were millions of illegal votes. Can't you even approach the truth.
The enelope has an address on it and a signature. Whose have to match, or it's invalid. The address has to be valid. The person can't be dead or a non resident.
I'm sure the tables are in public sight. Ballots laying flat down on a table are not unless observers were
