Concerning the abortion issue !

[beagle9]

I think Republicans need to be careful on this one. Banning abortions after a rape is going to far. Are we really going to make a 14 year old girl who was raped have a baby? Her life if now altered forever after an already life-altering horrific event that she had no control over.

On the other hand aborting a perfectly healthy baby after 20 weeks (20 as an example) is nothing short of murder.

Obviously there is no "happy" medium on this subject. But both sides need to find a resolution in the middle.

Shouldn't have to ever abort a baby, as measures to stop the possibility of a pregnancy would be immediate in the situation. That is the only way to stop the murders of babies in the womb, and to stop the process quickly before a baby ever forms out of such a tragic situation.

 

[PredFan]

A woman seeking to end a child's life on the black market is no different than a woman who would throw her child in a dumpster. It's criminal, and she should be prosecuted for the acts.

woman seeking to end a child's life on the black market is no different than a woman who would throw her child in a dumpster. It's criminal, and she should be prosecuted for the acts.

If Roe v Wade is overturned, would that increase or decrease the total number of abortions performed nationwide? I suspect the threat of prosecution won't deter many women from ending an unwanted pregnancy.

Well just as it is with women leaving children in locked cars with the windows up, the same type of prosecution should be administered unto those seeking an abortion unlawfully.

Yes, it is always hard to except change whether it be one way or another, but after prosections are stepped up in showing the seriousness of the law, you would see a sharp decline in women taking the law lightly, and seeking out ways to violate the law. What we have is several generation's now, who have been taught not to be responsible citizens in life, and that life has no real meaning anymore. What a disaster.

Yes, it is always hard to except change whether it be one way or another, but after prosections are stepped up in showing the seriousness of the law, you would see a sharp decline in women taking the law lightly, and seeking out ways to violate the law

Nation wide, there seems little support for a repeal of Woe v Wade:

NBC News Exit Poll: Two-thirds of voters favor keeping Roe v. Wade as is

If a majority of US voters refuse to roll back the abortion clock to pre-1973, how far are conservatives willing to go inflict their version of morality on those who disagree?

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Why don't you find a poll showing a majority of Americans support the repeal of Roe v Wade (Maybe Trump can help)

Trump in 1999: ‘I am Very Pro-Choice’

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

 

[georgephillip]

If Roe v Wade is overturned, would that increase or decrease the total number of abortions performed nationwide? I suspect the threat of prosecution won't deter many women from ending an unwanted pregnancy.

Well just as it is with women leaving children in locked cars with the windows up, the same type of prosecution should be administered unto those seeking an abortion unlawfully.

Yes, it is always hard to except change whether it be one way or another, but after prosections are stepped up in showing the seriousness of the law, you would see a sharp decline in women taking the law lightly, and seeking out ways to violate the law. What we have is several generation's now, who have been taught not to be responsible citizens in life, and that life has no real meaning anymore. What a disaster.

Yes, it is always hard to except change whether it be one way or another, but after prosections are stepped up in showing the seriousness of the law, you would see a sharp decline in women taking the law lightly, and seeking out ways to violate the law

Nation wide, there seems little support for a repeal of Woe v Wade:

NBC News Exit Poll: Two-thirds of voters favor keeping Roe v. Wade as is

If a majority of US voters refuse to roll back the abortion clock to pre-1973, how far are conservatives willing to go inflict their version of morality on those who disagree?

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Why don't you find a poll showing a majority of Americans support the repeal of Roe v Wade (Maybe Trump can help)

Trump in 1999: ‘I am Very Pro-Choice’

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

What's "irrelevant" about your inability to produce a poll showing American support for repealing Roe v Wade?

 

[PredFan]

Well just as it is with women leaving children in locked cars with the windows up, the same type of prosecution should be administered unto those seeking an abortion unlawfully.

Yes, it is always hard to except change whether it be one way or another, but after prosections are stepped up in showing the seriousness of the law, you would see a sharp decline in women taking the law lightly, and seeking out ways to violate the law. What we have is several generation's now, who have been taught not to be responsible citizens in life, and that life has no real meaning anymore. What a disaster.

Yes, it is always hard to except change whether it be one way or another, but after prosections are stepped up in showing the seriousness of the law, you would see a sharp decline in women taking the law lightly, and seeking out ways to violate the law

Nation wide, there seems little support for a repeal of Woe v Wade:

NBC News Exit Poll: Two-thirds of voters favor keeping Roe v. Wade as is

If a majority of US voters refuse to roll back the abortion clock to pre-1973, how far are conservatives willing to go inflict their version of morality on those who disagree?

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Why don't you find a poll showing a majority of Americans support the repeal of Roe v Wade (Maybe Trump can help)

Trump in 1999: ‘I am Very Pro-Choice’

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

What's "irrelevant" about your inability to produce a poll showing American support for repealing Roe v Wade?

Love it when you idiots double-down on stupid. Want to go for a triple?

 

[georgephillip]

Nation wide, there seems little support for a repeal of Woe v Wade:

NBC News Exit Poll: Two-thirds of voters favor keeping Roe v. Wade as is

If a majority of US voters refuse to roll back the abortion clock to pre-1973, how far are conservatives willing to go inflict their version of morality on those who disagree?

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Why don't you find a poll showing a majority of Americans support the repeal of Roe v Wade (Maybe Trump can help)

Trump in 1999: ‘I am Very Pro-Choice’

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

What's "irrelevant" about your inability to produce a poll showing American support for repealing Roe v Wade?

Love it when you idiots double-down on stupid. Want to go for a triple?

 

[Uncensored2008]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

Have you ever been raped, and then learned 6 weeks later (when there is a heart beat) that the morning after pill is too late. Have you considered the morning after pill is opposed by many social conservatives who claim its use is in fact an abortion, and to provide this solution would be an affront to God?

How would you react if you learned you were pregnant, or a loved one was raped and learned six weeks later that you/she was impregnated by a rapist, and you or she have to raise and pay for this ill-conceived child for at least 18 years?

Many women who have been raped don't disclose the crime.

Not the point, stupid.

The morning after pill / plan B should be administered in ALL rape cases.

No one needs to be waiting 6 weeks so that the abortion industrial complex has a chance to make a profit off of it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

While I would agree that including morning after pills in the rape response kit would do a lot to curtail abortions later, there are many pro lifers out there who view the morning after pill to be just as bad as an abortion.

It IS an abortifacient.

Do you agree with the heart beat law?

If so, plan B et al. stops life from developing.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

While I would agree that including morning after pills in the rape response kit would do a lot to curtail abortions later, there are many pro lifers out there who view the morning after pill to be just as bad as an abortion.

It IS an abortifacient.

Do you agree with the heart beat law?

If so, plan B et al. stops life from developing.

5he baby is human before the heart beats, but it is a step in the right direction in acknowledging the humanity of the unborn.

From conception to natural death, it is fully human, just in the continuous process of GROWTH.

 

[Uncensored2008]

5he baby is human before the heart beats, but it is a step in the right direction in acknowledging the humanity of the unborn.

From conception to natural death, it is fully human, just in the continuous process of GROWTH.

Certainly the baby is human, DNA proves that.

But is the baby an INDEPENDENT LIFE before heart and brain activity? I'd argue no. Hence I support abortificants but oppose any acts after heart or brain activity at 5 to 6 weeks gestation.

I am a scientist, I don't follow religion.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

But is the baby an INDEPENDENT LIFE before heart and brain activity? I'd argue no

No need to "argue."

Who doesn't disagree.

You seem to believe that this is a cut off 5hat you can "live" with and are comfortable killing the baby at this stage.

By this "logic." You are comfortable killing the elderly and the handicapped because they DEPEND ON OTHERS IN ORDER FOR THEIR WORTHLESS LIFE TO CONTINUE.

Pretty sad.

 

[Aletheia4u]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

They are using under these condition as an excuse to still abort the babies. They knows that Roe vs. Wade is going to be overturned. But to prevent that. They are trying to make laws that people will agree upon, so that they will stay away from the subject of overturning it. But actually the young girl that has been carrying for 9 months, can come into their abortion clinic and say that this is her brother's baby. But actually it is Bill Clinton's. And she will be eligible for an abortion. And for the others. The doctor can say, that this patient needs an abortion because her life depends on it. And then she will be eligible for an abortion as well. But really the patient life was never endanger. But they'll pay any doctor to say that their life is endanger so that they can receive it. But I believe in birth control pills that are 100% effective. Or give them female elephant steroids. That will harden the eggs that will prevent the sperm from penetrating. But if any woman comes in wanting an abortion. That they should give it to her and pull out her entire womb with the baby, without any anesthesia.

 

[PredFan]

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Lol, NBC.

And Trump has no path to victory.

Why don't you find a poll showing a majority of Americans support the repeal of Roe v Wade (Maybe Trump can help)

Trump in 1999: ‘I am Very Pro-Choice’

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

Irrelevant. Not even a nice try.

What's "irrelevant" about your inability to produce a poll showing American support for repealing Roe v Wade?

Love it when you idiots double-down on stupid. Want to go for a triple?

Ha ha, loser.

 

[RealDave]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

I get it. To prevent pregancy from rape excuses, all raped women must have an abortion.

 

[playtime]

uh-huh. what if the female doesn't know their rapist? what if the accused denies it & the court case gets delayed to the point of no return? what if incest is the accusation but is denied? how can you prove rape by blood without a blood test on the growing spawn inside her uterus? many women don't report for reasons only they can justify & forcing them to do so- taking away all choice to keep their privacy is wrong.

 

[RealDave]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

They are using under these condition as an excuse to still abort the babies. They knows that Roe vs. Wade is going to be overturned. But to prevent that. They are trying to make laws that people will agree upon, so that they will stay away from the subject of overturning it. But actually the young girl that has been carrying for 9 months, can come into their abortion clinic and say that this is her brother's baby. But actually it is Bill Clinton's. And she will be eligible for an abortion. And for the others. The doctor can say, that this patient needs an abortion because her life depends on it. And then she will be eligible for an abortion as well. But really the patient life was never endanger. But they'll pay any doctor to say that their life is endanger so that they can receive it. But I believe in birth control pills that are 100% effective. Or give them female elephant steroids. That will harden the eggs that will prevent the sperm from penetrating. But if any woman comes in wanting an abortion. That they should give it to her and pull out her entire womb with the baby, without any anesthesia.

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

Have you ever been raped, and then learned 6 weeks later (when there is a heart beat) that the morning after pill is too late. Have you considered the morning after pill is opposed by many social conservatives who claim its use is in fact an abortion, and to provide this solution would be an affront to God?

How would you react if you learned you were pregnant, or a loved one was raped and learned six weeks later that you/she was impregnated by a rapist, and you or she have to raise and pay for this ill-conceived child for at least 18 years?

Many women who have been raped don't disclose the crime.

All women should report a henious crime against them, especially in as far as rape or incest goes. If it is taught in society that these things (rape and incest), are very wrong from the age that is appropriate to teach such things to our young and vulnerable adults, and that their reporting is supported and secure for them to do so without shame, then things would begin to change in a more positive direction right ??

As long as the wrong messaging and teaching goes on, then confusion will continue to reign supreme in these area's of life.

Some did & got mocked & called liars.

 

[flack]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

I get it. To prevent pregancy from rape excuses, all raped women must have an abortion.

Morning after pill.

 

[RealDave]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

I get it. To prevent pregancy from rape excuses, all raped women must have an abortion.

Morning after pill.

Pro-Lifers consider it an abortion pill.

 

[skookerasbil]

So....presumably gays are born gay? Do I have that right? That's what I'm told by progressives.

So logically, there is a genetic marker somewhere.

What happens when in the future, evangelicals decide to abort babies because they dont want a gay child! Oh......oh......can you imagine the level of head explosions on the left when folks decide they dont want another Mayor Pete kid!

 

[flack]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

I get it. To prevent pregancy from rape excuses, all raped women must have an abortion.

Morning after pill.

Pro-Lifers consider it an abortion pill.

Not all of them. Me for instance.

 

[ph3iron]

It should be that if a rape or incest case were to take place, then aborting a baby would not be nessesary, because no baby should have time to form when reported by the victim immediately after the act takes place against them.

The emergency room would then offer the victim the "morning after pill" as a way to ensure there is no pregnancy from such an evil act.

Simple stuff really.

If a baby forms in the womb, then the baby becomes a protected life who is of course with the same rights to live (as is granted by God, and his or her fellow human beings), just as any human life has that same right to live, therefore we all should be protecting a fellow human beings life in the womb, just as it is outside the womb under these heavens and stars in which we all live and thrive together in.

I thought women got pregnant just to enjoy the pleasures of an abortion.
An old white fart told me that