Colorado Senate democrats introduce Bill to penalize people who tip off ICE

[1srelluc]

SB26-005 Rights Violation in Immigration Enforcement Remedy | Colorado General Assembly

If you're a civilian who calls in a tip to ICE, you could potentially face civil damages. So SB 26-005 in Colorado, Quietly creates a new civil lawsuit for immigration enforcement. And because it labels any person participating in immigration enforcement, it raises a real question: Could a private citizen who called in the individual who's injured during immigration enforcement activity be sued or face legal action?

Now that's some fine tyranny.....You can not hate the Democrat Party enough.

 

[pknopp]

SB26-005 Rights Violation in Immigration Enforcement Remedy | Colorado General Assembly

If you're a civilian who calls in a tip to ICE, you could potentially face civil damages. So SB 26-005 in Colorado, Quietly creates a new civil lawsuit for immigration enforcement. And because it labels any person participating in immigration enforcement, it raises a real question: Could a private citizen who called in the individual who's injured during immigration enforcement activity be sued or face legal action?

Now that's some fine tyranny.....You can not hate the Democrat Party enough.

While I 100% disagree with this, you can't fine someone simply for being a dick, you are on record with the government going after people for exercising their constitutional right to protest so..........

 

[1srelluc]

While I 100% disagree with this, you can't fine someone simply for being a dick, you are on record with the government going after people for exercising their constitutional right to protest so..........

I doubt if it would fly at the federal level but the "process" would be devastating. That's what they want.

LOL.....Make payphones great again.....Then again with all the cameras around you would have to wear a Nixon mask.

 

[kyzr]

While I 100% disagree with this, you can't fine someone simply for being a dick, you are on record with the government going after people for exercising their constitutional right to protest so..........

Not true, not being a dick, exercising free speech.
Protesting is fine, rioting or blocking ICE from enforcing Federal Law is illegal.

 

[pknopp]

Not true, not being a dick, exercising free speech.
Protesting is fine, rioting or blocking ICE from enforcing Federal Law is illegal.

You can be a dick while exercising your free speech.

Blocking Unconstitutional actions would be patriotic.

Judge orders release of Liberian man arrested in Minneapolis by agents with a battering ram

A federal judge in Minnesota on Thursday ordered the release of a Liberian man four days after heavily armed immigration agents broke into his home using a battering ram and arrested him. U.S. Distri...

www.yahoo.com

 

[Crepitus]

SB26-005 Rights Violation in Immigration Enforcement Remedy | Colorado General Assembly

If you're a civilian who calls in a tip to ICE, you could potentially face civil damages. So SB 26-005 in Colorado, Quietly creates a new civil lawsuit for immigration enforcement. And because it labels any person participating in immigration enforcement, it raises a real question: Could a private citizen who called in the individual who's injured during immigration enforcement activity be sued or face legal action?

Now that's some fine tyranny.....You can not hate the Democrat Party enough.

Fighting fascism is a time honored American tradition.

 

[martybegan]

You can be a dick while exercising your free speech.

Blocking Unconstitutional actions would be patriotic.

Judge orders release of Liberian man arrested in Minneapolis by agents with a battering ram

A federal judge in Minnesota on Thursday ordered the release of a Liberian man four days after heavily armed immigration agents broke into his home using a battering ram and arrested him. U.S. Distri...

www.yahoo.com

What they are doing isn't unconstitutional.

 

[pknopp]

What they are doing isn't unconstitutional.

And yet courts (including the Supreme Court) says they are.

 

[SeaMajor7]

How can that be remotely legal?
Seems ULTRA UNCONSTITUTIONAL even.
WTF?

 

[martybegan]

And yet courts (including the Supreme Court) says they are.

Show me where the Supreme Court has ruled on what is currently going on.

 

[pknopp]

Show me where the Supreme Court has ruled on what is currently going on.

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s effort to deploy National Guard in Illinois

 

[eagle7-31]

Fighting fascism is a time honored American tradition.

Translation: NO opposition to anything the Democrat party wants.

 

[OldFlame]

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s effort to deploy National Guard in Illinois

What does that have to do with ICE and the situation in Minnesota, or even what the OP posted?

 

[pknopp]

What does that have to do with ICE and the situation in Minnesota, or even what the OP posted?

It answered the question I was asked.

 

[SeaMajor7]

What does that have to do with ICE and the situation in Minnesota, or even what the OP posted?

Pknob is an obnoxious contrarian ASSHOLE.

 

[OldFlame]

It answered the question I was asked.

No it didn't. It started with your words below, you were asked what was unconstitutional and you respond with an SC ruling about national guard being deployed. The NG was nowhere to be found in this topic, so your comment had nothing to do with the topic, and you did not answer the question.

Blocking Unconstitutional actions would be patriotic

 

[pknopp]

No it didn't. It started with your words below, you were asked what was unconstitutional and you respond with an SC ruling about national guard being deployed. The NG was nowhere to be found in this topic, so your comment had nothing to do with the topic, and you did not answer the question.

Blocking Unconstitutional actions would be patriotic

Show me where the Supreme Court has ruled on what is currently going on.

I answered that question.

 

[OldFlame]

I answered that question.

'Currently going on', tell us how the SC ruling you posted impacts what is 'currently going on'?

 

[hadit]

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s effort to deploy National Guard in Illinois

The NG is military while ICE is not the military. Most can see the difference.

 

[OldFlame]

The NG is military while ICE is not the military. Most can see the difference.

I asked him to explain, but all I got was that he disagreed with my asking.