Color Of Change

Leo123

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
34,683
Reaction score
27,636
Points
2,915
Soros funded 'Color of Change' took credit for the Bragg case against Trump. The same group visited the White House 16 times. America First Legal is trying to sue Alvin Bragg. More here:

 
Soros funded 'Color of Change' took credit for the Bragg case against Trump. The same group visited the White House 16 times. America First Legal is trying to sue Alvin Bragg.

Color of Change: that was one of the secret shadow organizations that Time Magazine listed in 2021 who actively worked to make sure that Trump LOST the 2020 election regardless of how voters actually wanted.
 
Soros funded 'Color of Change' took credit for the Bragg case against Trump. The same group visited the White House 16 times. America First Legal is trying to sue Alvin Bragg. More here:

Hilarious

The shower filoffal guy!

Dude, you need better information and the ability to think critically.
 
Color of Change: that was one of the secret shadow organizations that Time Magazine listed in 2021 who actively worked to make sure that Trump LOST the 2020 election regardless of how voters actually wanted.
Yep Color of Change is only one of such Soros funded radical organizations.
 
Yep Color of Change is only one of such Soros funded radical organizations.

A few of the others which Trump probably ought to investigate for subversive activity and arrest all its members for include:
  1. Color of Change
  2. The Voter Protection Project
  3. Protect Democracy
  4. The Analyst Institute
  5. Catalist
  6. The Fight Back Table
  7. The Democracy Defense Coalition
  8. Planned Partenthood
  9. Greenpeace
  10. Indivisible
  11. Move On
  12. Working Families Party
  13. The CARES Act
  14. National Vote At Home Institute
  15. The Voter Participation Center
  16. All Voting Is Local
  17. Issue One
  18. The National Counsel On Election Integrity
  19. The Voting Rights Lab
  20. IntoAction
  21. The Woman's March
  22. The Sierra Club
  23. Democratic Socialists of America
  24. Protect The Results Coalition
 
A few of the others which Trump probably ought to investigate for subversive activity and arrest all its members for include:
  1. Color of Change
  2. The Voter Protection Project
  3. Protect Democracy
  4. The Analyst Institute
  5. Catalist
  6. The Fight Back Table
  7. The Democracy Defense Coalition
  8. Planned Partenthood
  9. Greenpeace
  10. Indivisible
  11. Move On
  12. Working Families Party
  13. The CARES Act
  14. National Vote At Home Institute
  15. The Voter Participation Center
  16. All Voting Is Local
  17. Issue One
  18. The National Counsel On Election Integrity
  19. The Voting Rights Lab
  20. IntoAction
  21. The Woman's March
  22. The Sierra Club
  23. Democratic Socialists of America
  24. Protect The Results Coalition
You can add 'Act Blue' which is the organization that both would be assassins donated to.
 
Soros funded 'Color of Change' took credit for the Bragg case against Trump. The same group visited the White House 16 times. America First Legal is trying to sue Alvin Bragg. More here:

I cackle every time I hear a supporter of Citizens United whining about special interest groups spending money on politics.

I really do.

Hey, do you know how many foreign government officials made paid visits to Trump properties while he was President?

150.

Do you know how many special interest groups held sponsored events at Trump properties while he was President?

137.

Do you know how many foreign governments hosted events on Trump properties while he was president?

13.


Did you know the CCP rented space in Trump Tower while he was president? They paid him $7 million and left the moment he left office.
 
Are you clowns still bitching about the 2020 election?

(1) you lost fair-and-square

(2) Americans have had 3-1/2 years of your lying bull$hit Big Lie about a rigged election

(3) grow-the-phukk-up and move on, will ya?
 
No, it is the finding of sixty-two court challenges

Wrong again, sweetcakes, though I understand that as an MSNBC cultist, you operate from a poor fund of knowledge.

There were actually 28 cases (a few of them adjudicated in sections totaling the higher number) and only two of the court challenges were actually entirely heard, and Trump won both of them. All the rest, the courts either dismissed or threw out without ever even testing the veracity and merits of the claims on technical grounds such as date of filing and lack of standing because judges are remiss in wanting to take on their shoulders the burden of deciding for America the outcome of a presidential race.
 
No, it is the finding of sixty-two court challenges; many in front of Republican and even Trump-appointed judges.

No. No it isn’t.

A dismissal for reason of alleged procedural issues is not a ruling on the merits. All of the cases (possibly one exception) were dismissed for such claimed reasons.
 
Act Blue is actually a funnel agency which collects donations then divvies the funds out to other organizations as needed.
Yes a Democrat fund laundering organization that should be investigated because their membership has produced 2 would be assassins. Shoot, by 'Bragg' standards, we could indict them!!!
 
Wrong again, sweetcakes, though I understand that as an MSNBC cultist, you operate from a poor fund of knowledge.

There were actually 28 cases (a few of them adjudicated in sections totaling the higher number) and only two of the court challenges were actually entirely heard, and Trump won both of them. All the rest, the courts either dismissed or threw out without ever even testing the veracity and merits of the claims on technical grounds such as date of filing and lack of standing because judges are remiss in wanting to take on their shoulders the burden of deciding for America the outcome of a presidential race.
Yes and Democrats always lie their assess off that the cases yielded nothing. They never seem to mention or even know that most cases were NOT rejected for lack of merit. They were not even considered or heard by the courts.

We are truly living in an era of tyrannical rule by one party, The Democrats. They have infiltrated the legacy media and our justice system. They represent a repressive regime bent on forcing the people to toe the leftist line, in their lives, speech, etc. or face the consequences of lawfare and bureaucratic repression.
 
Last edited:
Wrong again, sweetcakes, though I understand that as an MSNBC cultist, you operate from a poor fund of knowledge.

There were actually 28 cases (a few of them adjudicated in sections totaling the higher number) and only two of the court challenges were actually entirely heard, and Trump won both of them. All the rest, the courts either dismissed or threw out without ever even testing the veracity and merits of the claims on technical grounds such as date of filing and lack of standing because judges are remiss in wanting to take on their shoulders the burden of deciding for America the outcome of a presidential race.
Back then your Orange Baboon-God and you were throwing $hit on the walls and hoping that something stuck...

Poorly conceived hurried amateur-caliber challenges; some even without so much as "standing".

Usually laughed out of court even by Republican and even by Trump -appointed judges and justices.

Next time do a better job with your legal challenges instead of pi$$ing and bitching and moaning for the next four years.

Oh, and, as to MSNBC... I watch Fox and CNN and News Nation more than I watch MSNBC.

You and so many other MAGAtts confuse vigorous opposition to Trump with Leftism... and, as usual, you fools got it wrong.

Something that is poised to cost you dearly on November 5th... and we'll know about THAT soon enough... :itsok:
 
Back then your Orange Baboon-God and you were throwing $hit on the walls and hoping that something stuck...

Poorly conceived hurried amateur-caliber challenges; some even without so much as "standing".

Usually laughed out of court even by Republican and even by Trump -appointed judges and justices.

Next time do a better job with your legal challenges instead of pi$$ing and bitching and moaning for the next four years.

Oh, and, as to MSNBC... I watch Fox and CNN and News Nation more than I watch MSNBC.

You and so many other MAGAtts confuse vigorous opposition to Trump with Leftism... and, as usual, you fools got it wrong.

Something that is poised to cost you dearly on November 5th... and we'll know about THAT soon enough... :itsok:
Pure hate for no reason. ^^^^^
 
Back then your Orange Baboon-God and you were throwing $hit on the walls and hoping that something stuck...
Poorly conceived hurried amateur-caliber challenges; some even without so much as "standing".
Usually laughed out of court even by Republican and even by Trump -appointed judges and justices.
Next time do a better job with your legal challenges instead of pi$$ing and bitching and moaning for the next four years

Need a tissue? 😭
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom