College prez- “How do we make sure in future yrs we are not as white as we are today

[Kondor3]

It is slapping everyone in the face. I don't know how you can be a white person, and support something like this.

Why don't you cowards just come out and say it. You would like nothing more than to take part in the genocide of whites.

You retards are a barrel of laughs.

Sometimes, I wonder...

Some of the earlier observations in this thread are correct, however. about one thing...

Had this comment been about making the University less 'black' or 'yellow' or 'red', there would have been hell to pay...

But saying this about White Folk seems just fine...

There is something very, very, very wrong with such thinking...

Not to mention something very, very, very wrong with people who allow such things to be said unchallenged...

It's my hope that the people to whom this School Official reports (the University's board of trustees?) set a precedent, and fire the little wanker, for making racist comments...

What's good for the goose...

But they won't...

There is something very, very, very wrong with that, too...

 

[Asclepias]

It is slapping everyone in the face. I don't know how you can be a white person, and support something like this.

Why don't you cowards just come out and say it. You would like nothing more than to take part in the genocide of whites.

You retards are a barrel of laughs.

Sometimes, I wonder...

Some of the earlier observations in this thread are correct, however. about one thing...

Had this comment been about making the University less 'black' or 'yellow' or 'red', there would have been hell to pay...

But saying this about White Folk seems just fine...

There is something very, very, very wrong with such thinking...

Not to mention something very, very, very wrong with people who allow such things to be said unchallenged...

It's my hope that the people to whom this School Official reports (the University's board of trustees?) set a precedent, and fire the little wanker, for making racist comments...

What's good for the goose...

But they won't...

There is something very, very, very wrong with that, too...

Why is something wrong with that thinking? The country is not just white people. The University should reflect the country's makeup. White people have a different perspective than a Black, Asian, or Mexican person.

 

[1751_Texan]

The democrat hatred, persecution, and discrimination of whites keeps getting more and more brazen.

Western Washington University President Seeks to Ensure Students, Faculty Are Less 'White'

16 Apr 2014,
According to Bruce Shepard, president of Western Washington University (WWU), a university’s success is based not on its curriculum but on the color of its student body and faculty. In a school-wide questionnaire, the WWU community was asked, “How do we make sure that in future years 'we are not as white as we are today?'”

Shepard followed his convocation speech with a recent blog post on WWU’s website in which he defended his statement that the university will fail if it does not become less “white” in years to come.

“In the decades ahead, should we be as white as we are today, we will be relentlessly driven toward mediocrity; or, become a sad shadow of our current self,” he asserted.

Just to be clear...the WWU president is "white" right?

 

[Asclepias]

“In the decades ahead, should we be as white as we are today, we will be relentlessly driven toward mediocrity; or, become a sad shadow of our current self,” he asserted.

The guy is right. History will repeat itself for those that don't learn from its lessons.

 

[Harry Dresden]

[
Sometimes, I wonder...

Some of the earlier observations in this thread are correct, however. about one thing...

Had this comment been about making the University less 'black' or 'yellow' or 'red', there would have been hell to pay...

But saying this about White Folk seems just fine...

.

It shows how super-racist blacks and liberals are. They positively hate white people and would like to exterminate them. The crazy thing is that it's white people who gave us this advanced tech world we live in and without whites, we'd be back in the stone ages.

Blacks can't do technology and are only good for entertainment. If we get rid of any race it should be these useless blacks.

how about we gid rid of people like you?....

 

[Moonglow]

College prez- “How do we make sure in future yrs we are not as white as we are today

well there is tanning, and bleaching available...

 

[Kondor3]

You retards are a barrel of laughs.

Sometimes, I wonder...

Some of the earlier observations in this thread are correct, however. about one thing...

Had this comment been about making the University less 'black' or 'yellow' or 'red', there would have been hell to pay...

But saying this about White Folk seems just fine...

There is something very, very, very wrong with such thinking...

Not to mention something very, very, very wrong with people who allow such things to be said unchallenged...

It's my hope that the people to whom this School Official reports (the University's board of trustees?) set a precedent, and fire the little wanker, for making racist comments...

What's good for the goose...

But they won't...

There is something very, very, very wrong with that, too...

Why is something wrong with that thinking? The country is not just white people. The University should reflect the country's makeup. White people have a different perspective than a Black, Asian, or Mexican person.

What is wrong with that thinking?

Personally, as a White guy who has spent his entire adult life in the shadow of lopsided Race Quotas, in connection with various Career Paths and Educational Opportunities...

I think the 'begruding' has more to do with 50 years of Special Accommodation, to make-up in part for past wrongs and disadvantage, and thinking that 50 years is enough...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

Much of Affirmative Action spanning the past half-century was rightfully launched and did much good, even if the government seems to have over-done the thing...

But now, after 50 years, enough is enough...

Time for Racial Blindness, rather than continuing to hammer away at Whites simply for being White...

It's getting a little old...

 

[Asclepias]

Sometimes, I wonder...

Some of the earlier observations in this thread are correct, however. about one thing...

Had this comment been about making the University less 'black' or 'yellow' or 'red', there would have been hell to pay...

But saying this about White Folk seems just fine...

There is something very, very, very wrong with such thinking...

Not to mention something very, very, very wrong with people who allow such things to be said unchallenged...

It's my hope that the people to whom this School Official reports (the University's board of trustees?) set a precedent, and fire the little wanker, for making racist comments...

What's good for the goose...

But they won't...

There is something very, very, very wrong with that, too...

Why is something wrong with that thinking? The country is not just white people. The University should reflect the country's makeup. White people have a different perspective than a Black, Asian, or Mexican person.

What is wrong with that thinking?

Personally, as a White guy who has spent his entire adult life in the shadow of lopsided Race Quotas, in connection with various Career Paths and Educational Opportunities...

I think the 'begruding' has more to do with 50 years of Special Accommodation, to make-up in part for past wrongs and disadvantage, and thinking that 50 years is enough...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

Much of Affirmative Action spanning the past half-century was rightfully launched and did much good, even if the government seems to have over-done the thing...

But now, after 50 years, enough is enough...

Time for Racial Blindness, rather than continuing to hammer away at Whites simply for being White...

It's getting a little old...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

that was funny!

As long as white people control access there will always be a tendency to "whiten" institutions. It's natural. You are comfortable with who you identify with and hire that person because they exhibit what you perceive to be the right qualities. 50 years is not going to make up for 200 or more years of white AA.

 

[Kondor3]

Why is something wrong with that thinking? The country is not just white people. The University should reflect the country's makeup. White people have a different perspective than a Black, Asian, or Mexican person.

What is wrong with that thinking?

Personally, as a White guy who has spent his entire adult life in the shadow of lopsided Race Quotas, in connection with various Career Paths and Educational Opportunities...

I think the 'begruding' has more to do with 50 years of Special Accommodation, to make-up in part for past wrongs and disadvantage, and thinking that 50 years is enough...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

Much of Affirmative Action spanning the past half-century was rightfully launched and did much good, even if the government seems to have over-done the thing...

But now, after 50 years, enough is enough...

Time for Racial Blindness, rather than continuing to hammer away at Whites simply for being White...

It's getting a little old...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

that was funny!

As long as white people control access there will always be a tendency to "whiten" institutions. It's natural. You are comfortable with who you identify with and hire that person because they exhibit what you perceive to be the right qualities. 50 years is not going to make up for 200 or more years of white AA.

And that is where we differ.

I say that 50 years is enough.

You say no.

There is already a great deal of discussion surfacing in the metaphorical town square, with more to come.

How do you think this is going to trend?

How much longer do you think that the majority in this country are going to allow themselves to be subjected to AA, quotas, and all of that?

You may have present-day government AA policies on your side.

But, I suggest, you may not have, for much longer, as History measures time.

The 'Grand Accommodation' is past its Sell-By date... it's going sour in the public mind... it's time for another change.

 

[Moonglow]

What is wrong with that thinking?

Personally, as a White guy who has spent his entire adult life in the shadow of lopsided Race Quotas, in connection with various Career Paths and Educational Opportunities...

I think the 'begruding' has more to do with 50 years of Special Accommodation, to make-up in part for past wrongs and disadvantage, and thinking that 50 years is enough...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

Much of Affirmative Action spanning the past half-century was rightfully launched and did much good, even if the government seems to have over-done the thing...

But now, after 50 years, enough is enough...

Time for Racial Blindness, rather than continuing to hammer away at Whites simply for being White...

It's getting a little old...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

that was funny!

As long as white people control access there will always be a tendency to "whiten" institutions. It's natural. You are comfortable with who you identify with and hire that person because they exhibit what you perceive to be the right qualities. 50 years is not going to make up for 200 or more years of white AA.

And that is where we differ.

I say that 50 years is enough.

You say no.

There is already a great deal of discussion surfacing in the metaphorical town square, with more to come.

How do you think this is going to trend?

How much longer do you think that the majority in this country are going to allow themselves to be subjected to AA, quotas, and all of that?

I agree, not because of race, but the best of the best should get certain jobs, and putting people in positions that they lack the necessary training or intelligence to handle, negatively influences production and efficiency...

 

[Kondor3]

I can (grudgingly) concede the need for some Leveling of the Field, but 50 years is just about enough, I'd say.

It won't happen prior to January 20, 2017, of course, but, after that?...

 

[Nutz]

Although the OP is a ***** and found the need to create a thread that is already being discussed...it is a shame that some white people believe they need to abandon their culture in the name of multiculturalism. Don't get me wrong, I don't agree with the ***** OP or his like minded ***** brigade, but in the end, heritage does not equal hate. Forced multiculturalism, on the other hand, serves as a powder keg for pussies to hate.

 

[Nutz]

[
Sometimes, I wonder...

Some of the earlier observations in this thread are correct, however. about one thing...

Had this comment been about making the University less 'black' or 'yellow' or 'red', there would have been hell to pay...

But saying this about White Folk seems just fine...

.

It shows how super-racist blacks and liberals are. They positively hate white people and would like to exterminate them. The crazy thing is that it's white people who gave us this advanced tech world we live in and without whites, we'd be back in the stone ages.

Blacks can't do technology and are only good for entertainment. If we get rid of any race it should be these useless blacks.

*****. I wonder what you can do in technology besides be a ***** and post nonsense on a forum. *****!

 

[Asclepias]

What is wrong with that thinking?

Personally, as a White guy who has spent his entire adult life in the shadow of lopsided Race Quotas, in connection with various Career Paths and Educational Opportunities...

I think the 'begruding' has more to do with 50 years of Special Accommodation, to make-up in part for past wrongs and disadvantage, and thinking that 50 years is enough...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

Much of Affirmative Action spanning the past half-century was rightfully launched and did much good, even if the government seems to have over-done the thing...

But now, after 50 years, enough is enough...

Time for Racial Blindness, rather than continuing to hammer away at Whites simply for being White...

It's getting a little old...

It may be time to abandon 'reverse preferential treatment' in favor of Race Blindness or Transparency...

that was funny!

As long as white people control access there will always be a tendency to "whiten" institutions. It's natural. You are comfortable with who you identify with and hire that person because they exhibit what you perceive to be the right qualities. 50 years is not going to make up for 200 or more years of white AA.

And that is where we differ.

I say that 50 years is enough.

You say no.

There is already a great deal of discussion surfacing in the metaphorical town square, with more to come.

How do you think this is going to trend?

How much longer do you think that the majority in this country are going to allow themselves to be subjected to AA, quotas, and all of that?

You may have present-day government AA policies on your side.

But, I suggest, you may not have, for much longer, as History measures time.

The 'Grand Accommodation' is past its Sell-By date... it's going sour in the public mind... it's time for another change.

You can say you differ and understand why. I dont know how much longer AA will continue. I know white people are starting to feel afraid their position on top is crumbling and I expect them to correct that situation ASAP. AA never worked out like it was sold as white women benefit from it more than any other demographic. I think it was a switcheroo from the beginning to appear beneficial while bringing more income to be taxed into white households.

 

[Kondor3]

that was funny!

As long as white people control access there will always be a tendency to "whiten" institutions. It's natural. You are comfortable with who you identify with and hire that person because they exhibit what you perceive to be the right qualities. 50 years is not going to make up for 200 or more years of white AA.

And that is where we differ.

I say that 50 years is enough.

You say no.

There is already a great deal of discussion surfacing in the metaphorical town square, with more to come.

How do you think this is going to trend?

How much longer do you think that the majority in this country are going to allow themselves to be subjected to AA, quotas, and all of that?

You may have present-day government AA policies on your side.

But, I suggest, you may not have, for much longer, as History measures time.

The 'Grand Accommodation' is past its Sell-By date... it's going sour in the public mind... it's time for another change.

You can say you differ and understand why. I dont know how much longer AA will continue. I know white people are starting to feel afraid their position on top is crumbling and I expect them to correct that situation ASAP. AA never worked out like it was sold as white women benefit from it more than any other demographic. I think it was a switcheroo from the beginning to appear beneficial while bringing more income to be taxed into white households.

Well, that was an unexpectedly candid and congenial answer, and I was glad for it - thanks.

Looks like we continue to agree to disagree, but that's not the end of the world.

One final 'counter-point', though, if I may.

You seem to be eager to attribute the pending demise of AA to White Fear.

As a White guy, I humbly submit that it's more like a major-league case of Donor Exhaustion.

Generally speaking, and in-the-main, we've been Good Sports about this for decades.

If there was truly any particular and substantive level of Fear going-on there, I'm guessing that that would have manifested in serious and successful attempts to repeal AA long, long ago, rather than letting it ripen and fall off the vine, as seems to be about to unfold in our present age.

I could be wrong, but I really think it's more about Donor Exhaustion, after 50 years.

 

[Asclepias]

that was funny!

As long as white people control access there will always be a tendency to "whiten" institutions. It's natural. You are comfortable with who you identify with and hire that person because they exhibit what you perceive to be the right qualities. 50 years is not going to make up for 200 or more years of white AA.

And that is where we differ.

I say that 50 years is enough.

You say no.

There is already a great deal of discussion surfacing in the metaphorical town square, with more to come.

How do you think this is going to trend?

How much longer do you think that the majority in this country are going to allow themselves to be subjected to AA, quotas, and all of that?

I agree, not because of race, but the best of the best should get certain jobs, and putting people in positions that they lack the necessary training or intelligence to handle, negatively influences production and efficiency...

That is indirectly affected by racism though. If you dont have the skills because you didn't have the training ............ Some jobs yes but the majority of jobs? Anyone can work most low paying jobs without any skills necessary.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

it is a shame that some white people believe they need to abandon their culture in the name of multiculturalism.

What is this white people culture you speak of?

 

[Asclepias]

And that is where we differ.

I say that 50 years is enough.

You say no.

There is already a great deal of discussion surfacing in the metaphorical town square, with more to come.

How do you think this is going to trend?

How much longer do you think that the majority in this country are going to allow themselves to be subjected to AA, quotas, and all of that?

You may have present-day government AA policies on your side.

But, I suggest, you may not have, for much longer, as History measures time.

The 'Grand Accommodation' is past its Sell-By date... it's going sour in the public mind... it's time for another change.

You can say you differ and understand why. I dont know how much longer AA will continue. I know white people are starting to feel afraid their position on top is crumbling and I expect them to correct that situation ASAP. AA never worked out like it was sold as white women benefit from it more than any other demographic. I think it was a switcheroo from the beginning to appear beneficial while bringing more income to be taxed into white households.

Well, that was an unexpectedly candid and congenial answer, and I was glad for it - thanks.

Looks like we continue to agree to disagree, but that's not the end of the world.

One final 'counter-point', though, if I may.

You seem to be eager to attribute the pending demise of AA to White Fear.

As a White guy, I humbly submit that it's more like a major-league case of Donor Exhaustion.

Generally speaking, and in-the-main, we've been Good Sports about this for decades.

If there was truly any particular and substantive level of Fear going-on there, I'm guessing that that would have manifested in serious and successful attempts to repeal AA long, long ago, rather than letting it ripen and fall of the vine, as seems to be about to unfold in our present age.

I could be wrong, but I really think it's more about Donor Exhaustion, after 50 years.

Its fear. Donor exhaustion would imply you giving to someone needy instead of correcting a 200 year calculated wrong. Some white people are seeing the increasing numbers of minorities in the work place and are quite worried about what it means to compete on an equal playing field. The generation that participated in the civil rights is getting old and passing. Their children dont see the effects racism had and the warning bell of "all mine" is going off.

 

[Kondor3]

You can say you differ and understand why. I dont know how much longer AA will continue. I know white people are starting to feel afraid their position on top is crumbling and I expect them to correct that situation ASAP. AA never worked out like it was sold as white women benefit from it more than any other demographic. I think it was a switcheroo from the beginning to appear beneficial while bringing more income to be taxed into white households.

Well, that was an unexpectedly candid and congenial answer, and I was glad for it - thanks.

Looks like we continue to agree to disagree, but that's not the end of the world.

One final 'counter-point', though, if I may.

You seem to be eager to attribute the pending demise of AA to White Fear.

As a White guy, I humbly submit that it's more like a major-league case of Donor Exhaustion.

Generally speaking, and in-the-main, we've been Good Sports about this for decades.

If there was truly any particular and substantive level of Fear going-on there, I'm guessing that that would have manifested in serious and successful attempts to repeal AA long, long ago, rather than letting it ripen and fall of the vine, as seems to be about to unfold in our present age.

I could be wrong, but I really think it's more about Donor Exhaustion, after 50 years.

Its fear. Donor exhaustion would imply you giving to someone needy instead of correcting a 200 year calculated wrong. Some white people are seeing the increasing numbers of minorities in the work place and are quite worried about what it means to compete on an equal playing field. The generation that participated in the civil rights is getting old and passing. Their children dont see the effects racism had and the warning bell of "all mine" is going off.

I guess we differ on more than one aspect of this.

Neither of us seems likely to climb-down, but I think we've both had a good 'say' on this one, and I'm content.

Thanks.

 

[Asclepias]

Well, that was an unexpectedly candid and congenial answer, and I was glad for it - thanks.

Looks like we continue to agree to disagree, but that's not the end of the world.

One final 'counter-point', though, if I may.

You seem to be eager to attribute the pending demise of AA to White Fear.

As a White guy, I humbly submit that it's more like a major-league case of Donor Exhaustion.

Generally speaking, and in-the-main, we've been Good Sports about this for decades.

If there was truly any particular and substantive level of Fear going-on there, I'm guessing that that would have manifested in serious and successful attempts to repeal AA long, long ago, rather than letting it ripen and fall of the vine, as seems to be about to unfold in our present age.

I could be wrong, but I really think it's more about Donor Exhaustion, after 50 years.

Its fear. Donor exhaustion would imply you giving to someone needy instead of correcting a 200 year calculated wrong. Some white people are seeing the increasing numbers of minorities in the work place and are quite worried about what it means to compete on an equal playing field. The generation that participated in the civil rights is getting old and passing. Their children dont see the effects racism had and the warning bell of "all mine" is going off.

I guess we differ on more than one aspect of this.

Neither of us seems likely to climb-down, but I think we've both had a good 'say' on this one, and I'm content.

Thanks.

Maybe the view is different from your vantage point. I can admit you would probably know better than me.