News Flash: The CIA wouldn't recognize "Russian disinformation" if they saw it. They probably manufacture a certain amount of Russian disinformation just to justify their existence as a legitimate government agency.
TO THIS DAY, there is still an unsettled disagreement about the "LEAK vs. HACK" controversy of Wikileaks. I am of the opinion, that this, might very well be what those documents that Trump is accused of holding on to.
Julian Assange, even said, IT WAS NOT, Russia that gave him the Wikileaks documents. This also has to do with that circumstantial Seth Rich investigation.
Trump, denied that "assessment," of all the intel. agencies. The former intelligence agency experts, (VIPS,) disagreed with the folks that were in charge of the intelligence agencies while Trump was running against Clinton, and she used those assessments against Trump, to create that "Russian hacking," narrative, which, in the end, distracted folks from the CONTENTS of the Wikileaks. Which really, was almost enough to save her from defeat.
But? Most don't even remember that controversy, and Mueller himself, in his "Russia/Trump," collusion investigation, even used the narrative that it was a hack, and NOT a leak. This is what pissed Trump off so much. The FBI never even got the original data, that relied on Crowdstrike, which of course, had ties to an Ukrainian oligarch. I don't know that Ukrainian oligarch or the DNC was corrupt or not, the establishment never issued a subpoena for the original source scans of that data.
BOTH impeachments, had to do, one way or another, with this controversy. Was the DNC was trying to cover-up this corruption?
We will never know, it appears.
www.foxnews.com
