Chomsky had deeper ties with Epstein than previously known, documents reveal

Ok, now this is too funny. Wonder if the left will drop their guru like a hot potato, or look the other way?
I'm betting the latter. :biggrin:


'The philosopher and the sex trafficker were in contact long after Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor, documents reveal'






<~~~~~~>
Whoops, another 'Red Diaper' baby caught in the Epstein political sex net. This is becoming more like the 1963 British Sex scandal involving "Profumo Affair".

xxxxxxxxxx​
 
Ok, now this is too funny. Wonder if the left will drop their guru like a hot potato, or look the other way?
I'm betting the latter. :biggrin:


'The philosopher and the sex trafficker were in contact long after Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor, documents reveal'








Leftist are soft on pedos.
 
We can walk and chew gum at the same time, so just because you want all the focus to be on Epstein's relationship with Trump, doesn't mean we should turn our backs on the stories that connect other well-known public figures to him.
I didn't say they shouldn't report this. I didn't say people shouldn't talk about it.

However I doubt you'll find many on the left who care about Chomsky. He's not a politician, he's not anything.

Good lucky trying to deflect away from Trump.
 
We can walk and chew gum at the same time, so just because you want all the focus to be on Epstein's relationship with Trump, doesn't mean we should turn our backs on the stories that connect other well-known public figures to him.

Here's a British article about British people mentioned in the Epstein files


"
  • Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor – 173 mentions
  • Sarah Ferguson – nine mentions
  • Queen Camilla – nine mentions
  • Princess Diana – 14 mentions
  • Stephen Hawking 17 mentions
  • Richard Dawkins – 29 mentions
  • Tony Blair – 22 mentions
  • David Cameron – 19 mentions
  • Gordon Brown – 16 mentions
  • Colin Firth – 10 mentions
  • Piers Morgan – nine mentions
  • Naomi Campbell – 10 mentions
  • Nigel Farage – 18 mentions
  • Sir Mick Jagger – nine mentions
  • Adele – eight mentions
  • Sir David Beckham – nine mentions
  • Sir Elton John – eight mentions"
Are we going to go after Stephen Hawkings?

How many of those women in there do you think were having sex with underaged girls?

Elton John is GAY.
 
Is he an elected official? Is he a member of a royal family? Is he accused of fiddling underaged girls, or knowing about it and not reporting it? No. Then who cares?
He's on "Epstein's list."

Of course he fiddled underaged girs and knew about it. He hobnobbed with Epstein long after hecwas convicted of sex trafficking.

Trump dumped Epstein before all that came out, no record of Cimpsky ever dumping him.

You cannot be stupid enough to think tat Epstein was discussing philosophy with him.
 
Last edited:
I didn't say they shouldn't report this. I didn't say people shouldn't talk about it.

However I doubt you'll find many on the left who care about Chomsky. He's not a politician, he's not anything.

Good lucky trying to deflect away from Trump.

It's not a deflection, it's an acknowledgement that a lot of high-profile individuals can be connected to Epstein. Should we start calling all of them 'pedos'?
 
Leftist are soft on pedos.
"Leftists" are pushing hard for the Epstein files to be released, while Trump and company have been fighting their release.

536233624_762973666444399_8658077570797939802_n.webp
 
It's not a deflection, it's an acknowledgement that a lot of high-profile individuals can be connected to Epstein. Should we start calling all of them 'pedos'?

Well, a pedophile is someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent girls. So, I doubt the Epstein case has anything to do with pedophiles at all.

Trump is connected here because he was actually good friends with Epstein for a while.

But even that wouldn't have harmed Trump in any way.

However the last 11 months of Trump trying to avoid releasing the files, then being forced to release them. Then Bondi saying "we're not going to prosecute anyone, there's nothing in the files to prosecute", then Trump being forced to release them and suddenly saying "anything in the files connected with an active court case will be redacted" and then Trump suddenly deciding these cases which had no merit before, now need to spend the next three years in court.

Watch, all of the cases that come up, there will be delays and delays and delays, caused by the government's side.

No, nothing dodgy there. Cough cough.
 
Well, a pedophile is someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent girls. So, I doubt the Epstein case has anything to do with pedophiles at all.

Trump is connected here because he was actually good friends with Epstein for a while.

But even that wouldn't have harmed Trump in any way.

However the last 11 months of Trump trying to avoid releasing the files, then being forced to release them. Then Bondi saying "we're not going to prosecute anyone, there's nothing in the files to prosecute", then Trump being forced to release them and suddenly saying "anything in the files connected with an active court case will be redacted" and then Trump suddenly deciding these cases which had no merit before, now need to spend the next three years in court.
Trump did not say that, unless you mean Trump said it by signing and promising to enforce the law written by Democrats. That's what says gives the active investigations exception.

I said several times that would be what would happen, but TDS interfered with getting the message.
Watch, all of the cases that come up, there will be delays and delays and delays, caused by the government's side.

No, nothing dodgy there. Cough cough.
No cases will come up, unless they are against Democrats.

Even at that, I haven't seen evidence of any crimes to be prosecuted.

It wasn't a crime for hyper-liberal Chimpsky to have a close friendship with Epstein. But it is not hard to imagine why he wanted one.
 
Chomsky , like Soros = anti zionists fanatics.
 
Noam Chomsky is exactly the type of person Trump was trying to protect. Not "pedophiles" because there is no evidence that Epstein procured females of any age for Noam Chomsky to have sexual interactions with.

The fact that he was in the files that the DOJ and FBI of both parties pored over and he was never indicted for any sexual misconduct is not proof of innocence. But it is a good indication that they could not prove any such misconduct by Chomsky.

Yet here he is being smeared. He and many others.

All because Democrats and a few misguided Republicans had to grandstand after more than four years of silence.
 
Ok, now this is too funny. Wonder if the left will drop their guru like a hot potato, or look the other way?
I'm betting the latter. :biggrin:


'The philosopher and the sex trafficker were in contact long after Epstein was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor, documents reveal'






Wait, so he might have done what Trump did?

An odd MAGA approach.
 
15th post
Noam Chomsky is exactly the type of person Trump was trying to protect. Not "pedophiles" because there is no evidence that Epstein procured females of any age for Noam Chomsky to have sexual interactions with.

The fact that he was in the files that the DOJ and FBI of both parties pored over and he was never indicted for any sexual misconduct is not proof of innocence. But it is a good indication that they could not prove any such misconduct by Chomsky.

Yet here he is being smeared. He and many others.

All because Democrats and a few misguided Republicans had to grandstand after more than four years of silence.
I see
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom