All religions - at least the major world religions of today, offer much good in terms of civilized behavior, charity and compassion. They all have some version of the golden rule. To me, personally, to see the denigration of a religion by calling it's prophet a pedophile - is just plain wrong. Historical norms were different, and more important historical accounts as to the age of the Aisha are contradictory. Like with Mary - events were written about long long after the death's of the participants.
Today there is much good and much evil in most religions depending on how they are interpreted. Whether it's brutal child marriages or forced marriages ala Jeffers - it's wrong. But to taint an entire faith and to smear a faith's prophet by the actions of adherents who live in a culture where child marriages preceded the faith is wrong.
Child marriages are way wrong. And they occur in lands of many faiths. In the Abrahamic religions they are rooted in history. Even the Catholic Christian church has it's problems with pedohilia. But I don't think that is representative of the entire religion.
In ancient times marriages occured very young and people died very young. Aisha's age is highly controversial and it is used by Islamophobes in an attempt to portray Islam as a religion of pedophiles. My personal feeling is that is wrong and bigoted. It is accusations like that that feed events like the holocaust.
I know what Sunshine will say - moral equivalancy. Well, Sunshine - it's hard for me to really dislike you since I've seen your picture. You now seem like a real person. I don't agree. It is not a false equivelency. It's a realization that these are all real human beings. They deserve respect until they, individually, prove otherwise. It's the same with faiths. I know a number of Muslims, and not one would accept pedophilia as an acceptable marriage.
Demonizing an entire people or faith - especially a faith as complex and diverse as Islam, Christianity, or Judaism is dangerous. And Evil. That's simply my opinion.
I don't care what you think or what you deem to be morally equivalent or what history is or was. Raping a 9 year old girl to the point of death is NOT a social 'norm.' It is murder. You continue to justify the murder of this little child. Post after post, you justify it in terms of what you consider to be morally equivalent, and socially acceptable. You are seriously perverted and you need serious help. Not only that, you are vile and disgusting.
I only worked with children in my profession for a short time. I simply could not cope with the feelings that seeing the ways they had been abused by adults provoked caused me. It IS possible for a child that young to be introduced to sex without killing her. I know because one of my patients was 8 and her father, a local celeb in Nashville, had been having sex with her since she was 5. By age 8 she had a vagina which, on gyn exam, appeared as a fully adult vagina. Merely having sex with a young child will not kill her particularly if the person introduces the act to her in stages. Having violent, combative, assaultive sex will however tear the vagina, and the colon, and cause her to bleed to death just like the girl in the OP.
Even Sunni Man hasn't touched this one. If he has I haven't seen it. And he and I hotly disagreed over the Laura Logan incident in Egypt. I suspect he has raised daughters and finds this to be disgusting enough that, unlike you, he wouldn't even make any attempt at some perverted moral equivalency test.