Chicago to treat ecigs as tobacco products

[novasteve]

And this ban their use just about everywhere. Morons

Chicago set to ban e-cigarettes in no smoking areas | Mail Online

 

[Noomi]

I don't know enough about them, but if its not real smoke coming from them, why ban them?

 

[ScienceRocks]

They help people get off of real cigs and don't cause any smoke. Chicago just hates freedom.

 

[Mr. H.]

I suspect this is a prelude to taxing the shit out of these things, like they do real butts.

 

[Katzndogz]

They are just going to declare non tobacco products to be tobacco products!

Vapers will just have to learn to lie and say it's a marijuana vaporizer. No one complains about them.

 

[Katzndogz]

Banned in hotel rooms! How would they know? There's no smell.

 

[Pop23]

Banned in hotel rooms! How would they know? There's no smell.

You know you can use it with just water. Imagine the first person busted for inhaling steam!

 

[Mr. H.]

There's an ulterior motive here. This is Chicago, after all.
We'll see the second shoe drop before long.

 

[ScienceRocks]

This is stupid as it causes no second hand smoke.

There's a difference between helping lower death rates and being stupid.

 

[Pop23]

This is stupid as it causes no second hand smoke.

There's a difference between helping lower death rates and being stupid.

Chicago smells like a wrestlers armpits after a cage match, and they ban cigs?

 

[novasteve]

Given they aren't tobacco but will be treated as tobacco , this is a form of reality denial. There's also no smoke, no tars, etc. treating it like a tobacco product when it isn't would be like banning Nicolette or nicotine patches from public areas. Or classifying something that isn't a gun as a gun to make it illegal in public.

 

[Pop23]

Given they aren't tobacco but will be treated as tobacco , this is a form of reality denial. There's also no smoke, no tars, etc. treating it like a tobacco product when it isn't would be like banning Nicolette or nicotine patches from public areas. Or classifying something that isn't a gun as a gun to make it illegal in public.

Why not ban NyQuil also?

 

[jon_berzerk]

And this ban their use just about everywhere. Morons

Chicago set to ban e-cigarettes in no smoking areas | Mail Online

wait until they tax the hell out of it

a bunch of wrongly tax stamped e cigs will flood the market

--LOL

 

[jon_berzerk]

Given they aren't tobacco but will be treated as tobacco , this is a form of reality denial. There's also no smoke, no tars, etc. treating it like a tobacco product when it isn't would be like banning Nicolette or nicotine patches from public areas. Or classifying something that isn't a gun as a gun to make it illegal in public.

Or classifying something that isn't a gun as a gun

they already do that

how many little kids have been thrown out of school

for eating a piece of bread into the rough shape od a pistol

 

[novasteve]

Hit libs back. Consider gays to be a tobacco product turn they will understand their own bigotry

 

[Katzndogz]

Given they aren't tobacco but will be treated as tobacco , this is a form of reality denial. There's also no smoke, no tars, etc. treating it like a tobacco product when it isn't would be like banning Nicolette or nicotine patches from public areas. Or classifying something that isn't a gun as a gun to make it illegal in public.

We have an awful lot of denial of reality going on in this country.

 

[boedicca]

And this ban their use just about everywhere. Morons

Chicago set to ban e-cigarettes in no smoking areas | Mail Online

The goal is not to BAN, it's to TAX.

 

[novasteve]

They will ban them every where smoking is banned thus discouraging their use

 

[boedicca]

They will TAX THEM where smoking is TAXED.

It's all about more tax receipts for greedy government.

 

[novasteve]

They could tax soda and chips, this is about punishing smokers