Changing rain patterns where food is grown.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Harpy Eagle
  • Start date Start date
H

Harpy Eagle

Guest

The world’s food supply is under threat because so much of what we eat is concentrated in so few countries, and many of those countries are increasingly facing a water shortage. That’s the conclusion of three independent studies published this week.

One study, published by World Resources Institute, found that one quarter of the world’s crops is grown in places where the water supply is stressed, unreliable or both.

A second, published by the Global Commission on the Economics of Water, crunched the data slightly differently, concluding that half the world’s food production is in areas where water availability is projected to decline.

The third study, published by the European Union’s environmental agency, found that even some ordinarily wet parts of the continent face a drying trend.


No need to try and assign blame or any of the normal things that both sides are so fond of doing. Not that such a thing will keep those on here from doing so.

For anyone that is willing to put aside their personal partisan politics, this is a problem. We are seeing it in the area where I live, and so far the answer has to be irrigate more, but that of course has its own issues as it over times lowers the water tables.

Over time this will catch up to us and there will be a shortage of food if we do not start to diversify where food is grown and how we are going it. It is not about trying to stop climate change, it is about adapting to it before it is a crisis.
 

The world’s food supply is under threat because so much of what we eat is concentrated in so few countries, and many of those countries are increasingly facing a water shortage. That’s the conclusion of three independent studies published this week.

One study, published by World Resources Institute, found that one quarter of the world’s crops is grown in places where the water supply is stressed, unreliable or both.

A second, published by the Global Commission on the Economics of Water, crunched the data slightly differently, concluding that half the world’s food production is in areas where water availability is projected to decline.

The third study, published by the European Union’s environmental agency, found that even some ordinarily wet parts of the continent face a drying trend.


No need to try and assign blame or any of the normal things that both sides are so fond of doing. Not that such a thing will keep those on here from doing so.

For anyone that is willing to put aside their personal partisan politics, this is a problem. We are seeing it in the area where I live, and so far the answer has to be irrigate more, but that of course has its own issues as it over times lowers the water tables.

Over time this will catch up to us and there will be a shortage of food if we do not start to diversify where food is grown and how we are going it. It is not about trying to stop climate change, it is about adapting to it before it is a crisis.



The problem is called HUMAN OVERPOPULATION, too many humans consuming too much of finite land based fresh water.

The solution is two fold, desalination of ocean water now, and POPULATION CONTROL.

And anyone DUMB ENOUGH to blame the Co2 FRAUD for this fails immediately...

Jurassic was WARMER and WETTER...

 
how well did humans far during the Jurassic period?


A typical Co2 FRAUD question....

Humans were not around during Jurassic, but LIFE flourished... in part because there was NO SHORTAGE of LIQUID H2O during WARMER AND WETTER Jurassic...


A WARMER EARTH is a WETTER EARTH and everyone who blames "fires" on "Global Warming" is a CERTIFIABLE SCIENCE INVALID.
 
Humans were not around during Jurassic,

Then why do we give a fuck about what the environment was like back then when we are discussing how to deal with it now?

For the 999th time, I do not blame mankind nor CO2 for the changing climate. I personally think the cause is a moot point because if it were proven 100% tomorrow that man was the reason, we still would not change our ways.

The cause is not important, and only mindless partisan sheep from both sides continue to talk about it.

The only thing that is important is what we do about these changes, how do we adapt to them.
 
Reclaiming worn soil in places like eastern Africa and developing its water sources along with diversiving the crops grown and better livestock managment should be part of the answer. This isn't a new issue it has been discused for decades. Maybe we will see some major progress in the water issue and agriculture reform in general soon.
 
Last edited:
Then why do we give a fuck about what the environment was like back then when we are discussing how to deal with it now?



LOL!!!

Why do we care about DATA and TRUTH when we are stealing from the taxpayer hand over fist?

That's your question.


Jurassic is the WARM EARTH PARAMETER, when there is little to no land in the polar circles.

WARMER, WETTER, MUCH HIGHER SURFACE AIR PRESSURE

and that is why the FACT that SURFACE AIR PRESSURE is GOING DOWN is so important, because if there was an ongoing net ice melt, it would go UP....

BUSTED
 
Reclaiming worn soil in places like eastern Africa and developing its water sources along with diversiving the crops grown and better livestock managment should be part of the answer. This isn't a new issue it has been discused for decades. Maybe we will see some major progress in the water issue and agriculture reform in general soon.


"developing water sources" means DESALINATION of OCEAN WATER, otherwise YOU MAKE THE PROBLEM WORSE.
 
LOL!!!

Why do we care about DATA and TRUTH when we are stealing from the taxpayer hand over fist?

That's your question.


Jurassic is the WARM EARTH PARAMETER, when there is little to no land in the polar circles.

WARMER, WETTER, MUCH HIGHER SURFACE AIR PRESSURE

and that is why the FACT that SURFACE AIR PRESSURE is GOING DOWN is so important, because if there was an ongoing net ice melt, it would go UP....

BUSTED

Who gives a fuck if it where warmer and wetter back then.


This is not about the earth, this is about how it relates to humans. The earth does not give a fuck how hot or wet it is. But we humans do.


Rain patterns are changing and all you want to talk about is CO2. You are just as fucked in the head as those pushing that mankind is 100% responsible.
 
Who gives a fuck if it where warmer and wetter back then.


This is not about the earth, this is about how it relates to humans. The earth does not give a fuck how hot or wet it is. But we humans do.


Rain patterns are changing and all you want to talk about is CO2. You are just as fucked in the head as those pushing that mankind is 100% responsible.


No, I explain fully what does cause Earth climate change, and you blabber about "rain patterns" and you really do not have data that supports that claim. That is basic Farmer's Almanac stuff.

If you want a clue...



 
No, I explain fully what does cause Earth climate change, and you blabber about "rain patterns" and you really do not have data that supports that claim. That is basic Farmer's Almanac stuff.

The cause is irrelevant. I do not give a flying fuck what the cause is as there is no stopping it.

What matters is how we deal with the changes. And yes, I am talking about rain patterns as those actually impact humans.

But all you fucking care about is making some kind of political hay out of the cause.

If you ever want to talk about the actual changes and stop talking about CO2, let me know. Till then I will not waste one more second on you.
 

The world’s food supply is under threat because so much of what we eat is concentrated in so few countries, and many of those countries are increasingly facing a water shortage. That’s the conclusion of three independent studies published this week.

One study, published by World Resources Institute, found that one quarter of the world’s crops is grown in places where the water supply is stressed, unreliable or both.

A second, published by the Global Commission on the Economics of Water, crunched the data slightly differently, concluding that half the world’s food production is in areas where water availability is projected to decline.

The third study, published by the European Union’s environmental agency, found that even some ordinarily wet parts of the continent face a drying trend.


No need to try and assign blame or any of the normal things that both sides are so fond of doing. Not that such a thing will keep those on here from doing so.

For anyone that is willing to put aside their personal partisan politics, this is a problem. We are seeing it in the area where I live, and so far the answer has to be irrigate more, but that of course has its own issues as it over times lowers the water tables.

Over time this will catch up to us and there will be a shortage of food if we do not start to diversify where food is grown and how we are going it. It is not about trying to stop climate change, it is about adapting to it before it is a crisis.

Why are you posting news from 50 years ago? ... it was 100 years ago when drought destroyed the California grain farms in the Central Valley ... never mind the Dust Bowl ... solutions can be found in Israel ...

There's a very close correlation between fossil fuel affluence and negative fertility rates ... burn that coal, I dare you ...

... and THANK YOU for a post not related to climate change ... we need the break ...
 
Why are you posting news from 50 years ago? ... it was 100 years ago when drought destroyed the California grain farms in the Central Valley ... never mind the Dust Bowl ... solutions can be found in Israel ...

There's a very close correlation between fossil fuel affluence and negative fertility rates ... burn that coal, I dare you ...

... and THANK YOU for a post not related to climate change ... we need the break ...

You people are so fucking myopic.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom