CHALLENGE! I got two people to vote.

ozro

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
4,828
Reaction score
5,074
Points
1,930
Who can beat that. I drove them into town, 44 miles and the did early voting.
Nope, didn't ask don't care who the vote for.
Although one said she voted Trump.

Who can do better?


A real USMB challenge!

Come on, let hear about it....
 
Who can beat that. I drove them into town, 44 miles and the did early voting.
Nope, didn't ask don't care who the vote for.
Although one said she voted Trump.

Who can do better?


A real USMB challenge!

Come on, let hear about it....

Next challenge is to get people to support Proportional Representation. In 10 years going on about it, I've probably got two or three people to accept it's a good system that the US would be better off having.
 
Next challenge is to get people to support Proportional Representation. In 10 years going on about it, I've probably got two or three people to accept it's a good system that the US would be better off having.
That’s because it’s not good for anyone and you’re retarded for thinking so.
 
Next challenge is to get people to support Proportional Representation. In 10 years going on about it, I've probably got two or three people to accept it's a good system that the US would be better off having.
You would first have to disenfranchise all the states, erase the state boundaries... And dismiss all the state legislatures.
 
Who can beat that. I drove them into town, 44 miles and the did early voting.
Nope, didn't ask don't care who the vote for.
Although one said she voted Trump.

Who can do better?


A real USMB challenge!

Come on, let hear about it....
did the other person melt down and freak out when they heard someone was voting for Trump ?? if they didn't then you probably brought 2 people to the polls that voted for Trump ..good job !
 
Next challenge is to get people to support Proportional Representation. In 10 years going on about it, I've probably got two or three people to accept it's a good system that the US would be better off having.
What are the sub groups that you think need to be proportionally represented? And once you give your list why arent X, Y and Z subgroups that aren’t on your list on it?
 
There’s about 400,000 swifties voting

Kinda canceled the spawn of StupidIrishBitch
 
You would first have to disenfranchise all the states, erase the state boundaries... And dismiss all the state legislatures.
Oh I don't think it's that drastic. States are free to allocate their electors as they choose. Nothing in the Constitution demands a winner-take-all system.

States could choose to allocate electors based on Congressional district, with 2 electors given to the Statewide popular vote winner.

That would align a State's electors more closely to the way people in the State voted, and it would make every Congressional district equal in importance to the candidates. It would eliminate "swing states", every State would be important.

Forcing that on the States would require a Constitutional Amendment, but there is nothing that prevents States from adopting something like that on their own accord.

I think it would level the playing field, and it would preserve the electoral college. But I admit it is not likely that States would adopt something like that, it would reduce the importance of the large States in the winner-take-all system...
 
You would first have to disenfranchise all the states, erase the state boundaries... And dismiss all the state legislatures.

No, you don't.

Germany has Proportional Representation, it still has states (Laender), still has Land boundaries, the people are more enfranchises than the US.

You're just pumping out nonsense that you made up.
 
Back
Top Bottom